Literature DB >> 33714273

Finite element analysis of double-plate fixation using reversed locking compression-distal femoral plates for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Daisuke Takahashi1, Yoshihiro Noyama2, Tsuyoshi Asano3, Tomohiro Shimizu3, Tohru Irie3, Mohamad Alaa Terkawi3, Norimasa Iwasaki3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Internal fixation is recommended for treating Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures. Although several fixation procedures have been developed with high fixation stability and union rates, long-term weight-bearing constructs are still lacking. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of a double-plate procedure using reversed contralateral locking compression-distal femoral plates for fixation of Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures under full weight-bearing.
METHODS: Single- and double-plate fixation procedures for locking compression-distal femoral plates were analysed under an axial load of 1,500 N by finite element analysis and biomechanical loading tests. A vertical loading test was performed to the prosthetic head, and the displacements and strains were calculated based on load-displacement and load-strain curves generated by the static compression tests.
RESULTS: The finite element analysis revealed that double-plate fixation significantly reduced stress concentration at the lateral plate place on the fracture site. Under full weight-bearing, the maximum von Mises stress in the lateral plate was 268 MPa. On the other hand, the maximum stress in the single-plating method occurred at the defect level of the femur with a maximum stress value of 1,303 MPa. The principal strains of single- and double-plate fixation were 0.63 % and 0.058 %, respectively. Consistently, in the axial loading test, the strain values at a 1,500 N loading of the single- and double-plate fixation methods were 1,274.60 ± 11.53 and 317.33 ± 8.03 (× 10- 6), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that dual-plate fixation with reversed locking compression-distal femoral plates may be an excellent treatment procedure for patients with Vancouver B1 fractures, allowing for full weight-bearing in the early postoperative period.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Double plate; Finite element analysis; Locking compression‐distal femoral plate; Periprosthetic femoral fracture; Vancouver B1

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33714273      PMCID: PMC7956136          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04152-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  35 in total

1.  The biomechanics of plate fixation of periprosthetic femoral fractures near the tip of a total hip implant: cables, screws, or both?

Authors:  S Shah; S Y R Kim; A Dubov; E H Schemitsch; H Bougherara; R Zdero
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Treatment protocol for proximal femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Venkat R Rapuri; James J Purtill; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman; William J Hozack
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Risk factors for failure after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture of the femur.

Authors:  H Lindahl; H Malchau; A Odén; G Garellick
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-01

4.  Indirect reduction and plate fixation, without grafting, for periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures about a stable intramedullary implant.

Authors:  William M Ricci; Brett R Bolhofner; Timothy Loftus; Christopher Cox; Scott Mitchell; Joseph Borrelli
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  The effect of fixation technique on the stiffness of comminuted Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Jung Keun Choi; Thomas R Gardner; Ed Yoon; Todd A Morrison; William B Macaulay; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.

Authors:  Eric Fulkerson; Kenneth A Egol; Erik N Kubiak; Frank Liporace; Frederick J Kummer; Kenneth J Koval
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2006-04

7.  A mechano-regulation model for tissue differentiation during fracture healing: analysis of gap size and loading.

Authors:  D Lacroix; P J Prendergast
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Isolated locked compression plating for Vancouver Type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Ginger K Bryant; Saam Morshed; Julie Agel; M Bradford Henley; David P Barei; Lisa A Taitsman; Sean E Nork
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 9.  Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Peter V Giannoudis; Nikolaos K Kanakaris; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Periprosthetic femoral fracture--a biomechanical comparison between Vancouver type B1 and B2 fixation methods.

Authors:  Mehran Moazen; Jonathan H Mak; Lee W Etchels; Zhongmin Jin; Ruth K Wilcox; Alison C Jones; Eleftherios Tsiridis
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.757

View more
  2 in total

1.  Use of the Locking Attachment Plate for Internal Fixation of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Authors:  Bryce Wall; Jeffrey B Stambough; Steven M Cherney; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2022-05-03

2.  A Rare Case of Open 3A VTB2W Periprosthetic Fracture around a Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Veenesh Selvaratnam; Al-Amin Kassam; Matthew J W Hubble
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2022-03
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.