Literature DB >> 17467709

Principles of internal fixation and selection of implants for periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Peter V Giannoudis1, Nikolaos K Kanakaris, Eleftherios Tsiridis.   

Abstract

Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFF) are increasing as a result of changes in population demographics and the increase in the number of total hip replacements performed. The overall incidence has been reported to range from 0.1% to 6% of all total hip arthroplasties. Management of these fractures is often particularly demanding, complex and expensive. In many cases, the surgeon has to solve the simultaneous problems of implant loosening, bone loss and fracture. A thorough understanding of the unique characteristics of the different fracture types, the principles of PFF treatment and a familiarity with the various fixation devices, grafts and prosthetic implants are all of paramount importance. Internal fixation is used either alone or as an adjunct to stem revision. The stability of the original implant and the configuration of the fracture itself are the basic factors that influence the decision-making process. The current study reviews the existing literature on internal fixation of femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17467709     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2007.02.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  16 in total

Review 1.  In brief: classifications in brief: Vancouver classification of postoperative periprosthetic femur fractures.

Authors:  Greg E Gaski; Sean P Scully
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Biomechanical comparison of two angular stable plate constructions for periprosthetic femur fracture fixation.

Authors:  Dirk Wähnert; Richard Schröder; Martin Schulze; Peter Westerhoff; Michael Raschke; Richard Stange
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Combination of low-contact cerclage wiring and osteosynthesis in the treatment of femoral fractures.

Authors:  Andrea Angelini; Concetto Battiato
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-03-17

Review 4.  [Periprosthetic fractures. An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  R Stange; M J Raschke; T Fuchs
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Management of late periprosthetic femur fractures: a retrospective cohort of 72 patients.

Authors:  Cibu Mukundan; Faizal Rayan; Ehab Kheir; D Macdonald
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Generation of a Bone Organ by Human Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells Through Endochondral Ossification.

Authors:  Rik Osinga; Nunzia Di Maggio; Atanas Todorov; Nima Allafi; Andrea Barbero; Frédéric Laurent; Dirk Johannes Schaefer; Ivan Martin; Arnaud Scherberich
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 6.940

8.  A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Marsland; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

9.  Periprosthetic Vancouver type B1 and C fractures treated by locking-plate osteosynthesis: fracture union and reoperations in 60 consecutive fractures.

Authors:  Lonnie Froberg; Anders Troelsen; Michael Brix
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sung Ki Park; Young Gun Kim; Shin Yoon Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2011-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.