Literature DB >> 33712588

Human-interpretable image features derived from densely mapped cancer pathology slides predict diverse molecular phenotypes.

James A Diao1,2, Jason K Wang1,2, Wan Fung Chui1,2, Andrew H Beck3, Hunter L Elliott1, Amaro Taylor-Weiner4, Victoria Mountain1, Sai Chowdary Gullapally1, Ramprakash Srinivasan1, Richard N Mitchell2,5, Benjamin Glass1, Sara Hoffman1, Sudha K Rao1, Chirag Maheshwari1, Abhik Lahiri1, Aaditya Prakash1, Ryan McLoughlin1, Jennifer K Kerner1, Murray B Resnick1,6, Michael C Montalto1, Aditya Khosla1, Ilan N Wapinski1.   

Abstract

Computational methods have made substantial progress in improving the accuracy and throughput of pathology workflows for diagnostic, prognostic, and genomic prediction. Still, lack of interpretability remains a significant barrier to clinical integration. We present an approach for predicting clinically-relevant molecular phenotypes from whole-slide histopathology images using human-interpretable image features (HIFs). Our method leverages >1.6 million annotations from board-certified pathologists across >5700 samples to train deep learning models for cell and tissue classification that can exhaustively map whole-slide images at two and four micron-resolution. Cell- and tissue-type model outputs are combined into 607 HIFs that quantify specific and biologically-relevant characteristics across five cancer types. We demonstrate that these HIFs correlate with well-known markers of the tumor microenvironment and can predict diverse molecular signatures (AUROC 0.601-0.864), including expression of four immune checkpoint proteins and homologous recombination deficiency, with performance comparable to 'black-box' methods. Our HIF-based approach provides a comprehensive, quantitative, and interpretable window into the composition and spatial architecture of the tumor microenvironment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33712588      PMCID: PMC7955068          DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-21896-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  81 in total

1.  Adversarial attacks on medical machine learning.

Authors:  Samuel G Finlayson; John D Bowers; Joichi Ito; Jonathan L Zittrain; Andrew L Beam; Isaac S Kohane
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Combining dependent P-values with an empirical adaptation of Brown's method.

Authors:  William Poole; David L Gibbs; Ilya Shmulevich; Brady Bernard; Theo A Knijnenburg
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  The Cancer Genome Atlas Pan-Cancer analysis project.

Authors:  John N Weinstein; Eric A Collisson; Gordon B Mills; Kenna R Mills Shaw; Brad A Ozenberger; Kyle Ellrott; Ilya Shmulevich; Chris Sander; Joshua M Stuart
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 38.330

4.  Inter-observer agreement among pathologists in grading the pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer.

Authors:  Takeshi Yamaguchi; Hirofumi Mukai; Futoshi Akiyama; Koji Arihiro; Shinobu Masuda; Masafumi Kurosumi; Yoshinori Kodama; Rie Horii; Hitoshi Tsuda
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.239

5.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Large meta-analysis of multiple cancers reveals a common, compact and highly prognostic hypoxia metagene.

Authors:  F M Buffa; A L Harris; C M West; C J Miller
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Classification and mutation prediction from non-small cell lung cancer histopathology images using deep learning.

Authors:  Nicolas Coudray; Paolo Santiago Ocampo; Theodore Sakellaropoulos; Navneet Narula; Matija Snuderl; David Fenyö; Andre L Moreira; Narges Razavian; Aristotelis Tsirigos
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Comprehensive analysis of lung cancer pathology images to discover tumor shape and boundary features that predict survival outcome.

Authors:  Shidan Wang; Alyssa Chen; Lin Yang; Ling Cai; Yang Xie; Junya Fujimoto; Adi Gazdar; Guanghua Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pan-cancer diagnostic consensus through searching archival histopathology images using artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Shivam Kalra; H R Tizhoosh; Sultaan Shah; Charles Choi; Savvas Damaskinos; Amir Safarpoor; Sobhan Shafiei; Morteza Babaie; Phedias Diamandis; Clinton J V Campbell; Liron Pantanowitz
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-03-10

Review 10.  Tumor-associated macrophages: an accomplice in solid tumor progression.

Authors:  Yibing Chen; Yucen Song; Wei Du; Longlong Gong; Haocai Chang; Zhengzhi Zou
Journal:  J Biomed Sci       Date:  2019-10-20       Impact factor: 8.410

View more
  20 in total

1.  The Porto European Cancer Research Summit 2021.

Authors:  Ulrik Ringborg; Anton Berns; Julio E Celis; Manuel Heitor; Josep Tabernero; Joachim Schüz; Michael Baumann; Rui Henrique; Matti Aapro; Partha Basu; Regina Beets-Tan; Benjamin Besse; Fátima Cardoso; Fátima Carneiro; Guy van den Eede; Alexander Eggermont; Stefan Fröhling; Susan Galbraith; Elena Garralda; Douglas Hanahan; Thomas Hofmarcher; Bengt Jönsson; Olli Kallioniemi; Miklós Kásler; Eva Kondorosi; Jan Korbel; Denis Lacombe; José Carlos Machado; José M Martin-Moreno; Francoise Meunier; Péter Nagy; Paolo Nuciforo; Simon Oberst; Júlio Oliveiera; Maria Papatriantafyllou; Walter Ricciardi; Alexander Roediger; Bettina Ryll; Richard Schilsky; Grazia Scocca; Raquel Seruca; Marta Soares; Karen Steindorf; Vincenzo Valentini; Emile Voest; Elisabete Weiderpass; Nils Wilking; Amanda Wren; Laurence Zitvogel
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 6.603

2.  Comparative analysis of high- and low-level deep learning approaches in microsatellite instability prediction.

Authors:  Jeonghyuk Park; Yul Ri Chung; Akinao Nose
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival.

Authors:  Kevin Sandeman; Sami Blom; Ville Koponen; Anniina Manninen; Juuso Juhila; Antti Rannikko; Tuomas Ropponen; Tuomas Mirtti
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

Review 4.  Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  Haomin Chen; Catalina Gomez; Chien-Ming Huang; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-10-19

Review 5.  Harnessing multimodal data integration to advance precision oncology.

Authors:  Kevin M Boehm; Pegah Khosravi; Rami Vanguri; Jianjiong Gao; Sohrab P Shah
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 69.800

Review 6.  Ethics of AI in Pathology: Current Paradigms and Emerging Issues.

Authors:  Chhavi Chauhan; Rama R Gullapalli
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 5.770

Review 7.  Next-Generation Digital Histopathology of the Tumor Microenvironment.

Authors:  Felicitas Mungenast; Achala Fernando; Robert Nica; Bogdan Boghiu; Bianca Lungu; Jyotsna Batra; Rupert C Ecker
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.096

8.  Human-interpretable image features derived from densely mapped cancer pathology slides predict diverse molecular phenotypes.

Authors:  James A Diao; Jason K Wang; Wan Fung Chui; Andrew H Beck; Hunter L Elliott; Amaro Taylor-Weiner; Victoria Mountain; Sai Chowdary Gullapally; Ramprakash Srinivasan; Richard N Mitchell; Benjamin Glass; Sara Hoffman; Sudha K Rao; Chirag Maheshwari; Abhik Lahiri; Aaditya Prakash; Ryan McLoughlin; Jennifer K Kerner; Murray B Resnick; Michael C Montalto; Aditya Khosla; Ilan N Wapinski
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Deep Neural Network-Aided Histopathological Analysis of Myocardial Injury.

Authors:  Yiping Jiao; Jie Yuan; Oluwatofunmi Modupeoluwa Sodimu; Yong Qiang; Yichen Ding
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-01-10

Review 10.  From What to Why, the Growing Need for a Focus Shift Toward Explainability of AI in Digital Pathology.

Authors:  Samuel P Border; Pinaki Sarder
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 4.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.