Literature DB >> 24818656

Particle size distribution of exosomes and microvesicles determined by transmission electron microscopy, flow cytometry, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and resistive pulse sensing.

E van der Pol1, F A W Coumans, A E Grootemaat, C Gardiner, I L Sargent, P Harrison, A Sturk, T G van Leeuwen, R Nieuwland.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Enumeration of extracellular vesicles has clinical potential as a biomarker for disease. In biological samples, the smallest and largest vesicles typically differ 25-fold in size, 300,000-fold in concentration, 20,000-fold in volume, and 10,000,000-fold in scattered light. Because of this heterogeneity, the currently employed techniques detect concentrations ranging from 10(4) to 10(12) vesicles mL(-1) .
OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the large variation in the detected concentration of vesicles is caused by the minimum detectable vesicle size of five widely used techniques.
METHODS: The size and concentration of vesicles and reference beads were measured with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), a conventional flow cytometer, a flow cytometer dedicated to detecting submicrometer particles, nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), and resistive pulse sensing (RPS).
RESULTS: Each technique gave a different size distribution and a different concentration for the same vesicle sample.
CONCLUSION: Differences between the detected vesicle concentrations are primarily caused by differences between the minimum detectable vesicle sizes. The minimum detectable vesicle sizes were 70-90 nm for NTA, 70-100 nm for RPS, 150-190 nm for dedicated flow cytometry, and 270-600 nm for conventional flow cytometry. TEM could detect the smallest vesicles present, albeit after adhesion on a surface. Dedicated flow cytometry was most accurate in determining the size of reference beads, but is expected to be less accurate on vesicles, owing to heterogeneity of the refractive index of vesicles. Nevertheless, dedicated flow cytometry is relatively fast and allows multiplex fluorescence detection, making it most applicable to clinical research.
© 2014 International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cell-derived microparticles; exosomes; optical devices; reference standards; secretory vesicles

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24818656     DOI: 10.1111/jth.12602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


  248 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of factors influencing extracellular vesicle yield from cell cultures.

Authors:  Johann Mar Gudbergsson; Kasper Bendix Johnsen; Martin Najbjerg Skov; Meg Duroux
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 2.058

2.  Predicting therapeutic nanomedicine efficacy using a companion magnetic resonance imaging nanoparticle.

Authors:  Miles A Miller; Suresh Gadde; Christina Pfirschke; Camilla Engblom; Melissa M Sprachman; Rainer H Kohler; Katherine S Yang; Ashley M Laughney; Gregory Wojtkiewicz; Nazila Kamaly; Sushma Bhonagiri; Mikael J Pittet; Omid C Farokhzad; Ralph Weissleder
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Using exosomes, naturally-equipped nanocarriers, for drug delivery.

Authors:  Elena V Batrakova; Myung Soo Kim
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Multimodal Dispersion of Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Evaluation of Size Distribution with 9 Size Measurement Methods.

Authors:  Fanny Varenne; Ali Makky; Mireille Gaucher-Delmas; Frédéric Violleau; Christine Vauthier
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Isolation and characterization of urinary extracellular vesicles: implications for biomarker discovery.

Authors:  Michael L Merchant; Ilse M Rood; Jeroen K J Deegens; Jon B Klein
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 6.  Extracellular vesicles in renal disease.

Authors:  Diana Karpman; Anne-Lie Ståhl; Ida Arvidsson
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 7.  Extracellular vesicles such as prostate cancer cell fragments as a fluid biopsy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  S I Brett; Y Kim; C N Biggs; J L Chin; H S Leong
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.554

8.  Recombinant extracellular vesicles as biological reference material for method development, data normalization and assessment of (pre-)analytical variables.

Authors:  Edward Geeurickx; Lien Lippens; Pekka Rappu; Bruno G De Geest; Olivier De Wever; An Hendrix
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  Standardization of microparticle enumeration across different flow cytometry platforms: results of a multicenter collaborative workshop.

Authors:  S Cointe; C Judicone; S Robert; M J Mooberry; P Poncelet; M Wauben; R Nieuwland; N S Key; F Dignat-George; R Lacroix
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 5.824

10.  Dynamic Scaling of Exosome Sizes.

Authors:  Michael Paulaitis; Kitty Agarwal; Patrick Nana-Sinkam
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.882

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.