| Literature DB >> 33708981 |
Yan Zhou1,2,3, Lin Zhao2,3, Xinyu Zhong4, Jianmin Ding2,3, Hongyu Zhou2,3, Fengmei Wang3,5, Xiang Jing2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Our study aims to develop a novel tissue-mimicking thermochromic with tumor model for visualization of thermal ablation and verification of ablation plans.Entities:
Keywords: Phantom model; ablation planning; thermal ablation; ultrasound
Year: 2021 PMID: 33708981 PMCID: PMC7944255 DOI: 10.21037/atm-21-523
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Transl Med ISSN: 2305-5839
Figure 1The color differences of phantom samples with (magenta one) and without (cream white one) hot water bath.
Mono-site ablation size at 60 W with different time
| Size | 60 W, 5 minutes | 60 W, 10 minutes | 60 W, 15 minutes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Long radius (cm) | 3.0 | 3.5 | 4.0 |
| Short radius (cm) | 1.8 | 2.5 | 3.5 |
Figure 2The gross specimen of the phantom model after MWA. (A) Phantom samples were ablated with 60 W at a different time; (B) phantom samples were ablated with the same power and time at 60 W, 5 minutes.
Mono-site ablation size at 60 W with different time
| Size | 1st | 2nd | 3rd | 4th | 5th | 6th | Mean value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60 W, 5 minutes | |||||||
| Long radius (cm) | 3.0 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 3.0±0.05 |
| Short radius (cm) | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.8 | 1.8±0.05 |
| 60 W, 10 minutes | |||||||
| Long radius (cm) | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5±0.06 |
| Short radius (cm) | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 2.5±0.06 |
| 60 W, 15 minutes | |||||||
| Long radius (cm) | 4.0 | 3.9 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.0±0.05 |
| Short radius (cm) | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.5±0.06 |
Figure 3The US and 3D US images of the spherical tumor model. (A) Photo of a 3.0 cm spherical tumor model (↑); (B) the US illustrates the tumor model (↑); (C) 3D ultrasound image of the tumor model embedded in the parenchyma model.
Figure 4Ablation planning of the spherical tumor model. (A) An incomplete ablation (↑) can be displayed on 3-D ultrasound images during the ablation planning procedure; (B) a complete ablation can be achieved with 4 points ablation.
Figure 5The expected results in ablation planning with the corresponding gross specimen of the phantom model. (A) Ablation producer was performed exactly as planned to retrieve complete ablation; (B) the complete ablation was verified on the phantom model; (C) only 3 ablation points were performed as planned to retrieve incomplete ablation; (D) the incomplete ablation was verified, and the residual tumor model (↑) was displayed on a phantom model.