L Legrand1, M Tisserand1, G Turc2, O Naggara1, M Edjlali1, C Mellerio1, J-L Mas2, J-F Méder1, J-C Baron2, C Oppenheim3. 1. From the Departments of Radiology (L.L., M.T., O.N., M.E., C.M., J.-F.M., C.O.). 2. Neurology (G.T., J.-L.M, J.-C.B.), Université Paris Descartes Sorbonne Paris Cité, Centre de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale S894, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France. 3. From the Departments of Radiology (L.L., M.T., O.N., M.E., C.M., J.-F.M., C.O.) c.oppenheim@ch-sainte-anne.fr.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In acute stroke with proximal artery occlusion, FLAIR vascular hyperintensities observed beyond the boundaries of the cortical lesion on DWI (newly defined "FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch") may be a marker of tissue at risk of infarction. Our aim was to compare the occurrence of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch relative to that of perfusion-weighted imaging-DWI mismatch in patients with proximal MCA occlusion before IV thrombolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 141 consecutive patients with proximal MCA occlusion, 2 independent observers analyzed FLAIR images for the presence of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch before IV thrombolysis. PWI-DWI mismatch was defined as Volumehypoperfusion > 1.8 × VolumeDWI, with Volumehypoperfusion > 6 seconds on time to maximum value of the residue function maps in the 94 patients with available PWI. The presence of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch, PWI-DWI mismatch, and infarct growth on 24-hour follow-up DWI was compared. RESULTS: A FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch was present in 102/141 (72%) patients, with an excellent interobserver reliability (κ = 0.91), and a PWI-DWI mismatch, in 61 of the 94 (65%) patients with available PWI. FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch predicted PWI-DWI mismatch with a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI, 85%-99%) and a specificity of 64% (95% CI, 47%-80%). Patients with FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch had smaller initial DWI lesion and larger infarct growth (P < .001) than patients without FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch, even though their final infarcts remained smaller (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Albeit being moderately specific, probably due to inclusion of oligemic tissue, the FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch identifies large PWI-DWI mismatch with high sensitivity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In acute stroke with proximal artery occlusion, FLAIR vascular hyperintensities observed beyond the boundaries of the cortical lesion on DWI (newly defined "FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch") may be a marker of tissue at risk of infarction. Our aim was to compare the occurrence of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch relative to that of perfusion-weighted imaging-DWI mismatch in patients with proximal MCA occlusion before IV thrombolysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 141 consecutive patients with proximal MCA occlusion, 2 independent observers analyzed FLAIR images for the presence of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch before IV thrombolysis. PWI-DWI mismatch was defined as Volumehypoperfusion > 1.8 × VolumeDWI, with Volumehypoperfusion > 6 seconds on time to maximum value of the residue function maps in the 94 patients with available PWI. The presence of FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch, PWI-DWI mismatch, and infarct growth on 24-hour follow-up DWI was compared. RESULTS: A FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch was present in 102/141 (72%) patients, with an excellent interobserver reliability (κ = 0.91), and a PWI-DWI mismatch, in 61 of the 94 (65%) patients with available PWI. FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch predicted PWI-DWI mismatch with a sensitivity of 92% (95% CI, 85%-99%) and a specificity of 64% (95% CI, 47%-80%). Patients with FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch had smaller initial DWI lesion and larger infarct growth (P < .001) than patients without FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch, even though their final infarcts remained smaller (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Albeit being moderately specific, probably due to inclusion of oligemic tissue, the FLAIR vascular hyperintensity-DWI mismatch identifies large PWI-DWI mismatch with high sensitivity.
Authors: Maarten G Lansberg; Matus Straka; Stephanie Kemp; Michael Mlynash; Lawrence R Wechsler; Tudor G Jovin; Michael J Wilder; Helmi L Lutsep; Todd J Czartoski; Richard A Bernstein; Cherylee W J Chang; Steven Warach; Franz Fazekas; Manabu Inoue; Aaryani Tipirneni; Scott A Hamilton; Greg Zaharchuk; Michael P Marks; Roland Bammer; Gregory W Albers Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Oh Young Bang; Jeffrey L Saver; Suk Jae Kim; Gyeong-Moon Kim; Chin-Sang Chung; Bruce Ovbiagele; Kwang Ho Lee; David S Liebeskind Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-01-13 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Bastian Cheng; Martin Ebinger; Anna Kufner; Martin Köhrmann; Ona Wu; Dong-Wha Kang; David Liebeskind; Thomas Tourdias; Oliver C Singer; Soren Christensen; Steve Warach; Marie Luby; Jochen B Fiebach; Jens Fiehler; Christian Gerloff; Götz Thomalla Journal: Stroke Date: 2012-08-28 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: N Pérez de la Ossa; M Hernández-Pérez; S Domènech; P Cuadras; A Massuet; M Millán; M Gomis; E López-Cancio; L Dorado; A Dávalos Journal: Cerebrovasc Dis Date: 2012-11-29 Impact factor: 2.762
Authors: Dezhi Liu; Fabien Scalzo; Neal M Rao; Jason D Hinman; Doojin Kim; Latisha K Ali; Jeffrey L Saver; Wen Sun; Qiliang Dai; Xinfeng Liu; David S Liebeskind Journal: Stroke Date: 2016-09-22 Impact factor: 7.914