Literature DB >> 33706727

Is the contralateral lesser trochanter a reliable reference for planning of total hip arthroplasty - a 3-dimensional analysis.

Julian Hasler1, Armando Hoch2, Philipp Fürnstahl3, Jakob Ackermann2, Patrick O Zingg2, Lazaros Vlachopoulos2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative templating in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is mandatory to achieve appropriate offset and leg length equality. However, templating methods using the contralateral hip might be susceptible to errors resulting from side-differences in the femoral morphology. The distance of the lesser trochanter to the femoral head center (LTFHD) is a frequently used reference parameter for preoperative planning and intraoperative validation during THA. However, currently no three-dimensional (3D) analysis of side differences of the LTFHD exists.
METHODS: Using Computer tomography (CT)-based surface models from 100 paired femora (50 cadavers), side-to-side asymmetry of the LTFHD, femoral length, femoral head diameter (FHD) and femoral antetorsion were analyzed. Univariate linear regression models were established to evaluate potential associations between sides regarding LTFHD and FHD as well as a correlation of these parameters with each other.
RESULTS: Statistically significant side-differences were found for the LTFHD (p = 0.02) and FHD (p = 0.03) with a mean absolute side-difference of 1.6 ± 1.4mm (range 0.1-5.5mm) and 0.4mm ± 0.6mm (range 0-3mm), respectively. The ratio between the LTFHD and FHD was consistent with an average value of 1.16 ± 0.08 and reliable between sides with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.72 (p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The LTFHD is a reliable reference parameter for preoperative templating and intraoperative validation during THA with a high correlation between sides (r = 0.93, p < 0.01). However, 8 % of the investigated specimens revealed a LTFHD of more than 4mm, which should be anticipated during THA to avoid unsatisfiable results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-Dimensional analysis; Center of femoral head; Distance; Lesser trochanter; Side‐to‐side difference; Total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33706727      PMCID: PMC7953689          DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04131-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord        ISSN: 1471-2474            Impact factor:   2.362


  25 in total

Review 1.  Preoperative planning for primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Douglas E Padgett; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.020

2.  A simple method to minimize limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kenta Matsuda; Shigeru Nakamura; Takashi Matsushita
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  The utility and precision of analogue and digital preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alejandro González Della Valle; Fernando Comba; Nicole Taveras; Eduardo A Salvati
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Ahmad Malik; Johan Witt; Fares Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  The evaluation of two references for restoring proximal femoral anatomy during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Aasis Unnanuntana; Paul Toogood; Daniel Hart; Daniel Cooperman; Richard E Grant
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.414

6.  Side-to-side variation in normal femoral morphology: 3D CT analysis of 122 femurs.

Authors:  D Dimitriou; T-Y Tsai; B Yue; H E Rubash; Y-M Kwon; G Li
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Stability and leg length equality in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew S Austin; William J Hozack; Peter F Sharkey; Richard H Rothman
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Predicting femoral head diameter and lesser trochanter to center of femoral head distance: a novel method of templating hip hemiarthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniil L Polishchuk; David A Patrick; Borys V Gvozdyev; Jonathan H Lee; Jeffrey A Geller; William Macaulay
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Relationship between femoral head size and distance to lesser trochanter.

Authors:  Robert C Sproul; H M Reynolds; Jeffrey C Lotz; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Increasing shape modelling accuracy by adjusting for subject positioning: an application to the analysis of radiographic proximal femur symmetry using data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative.

Authors:  C Lindner; G A Wallis; T F Cootes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  1 in total

1.  No relevant mechanical leg axis deviation in the frontal and sagittal planes is to be expected after subtrochanteric or supracondylar femoral rotational or derotational osteotomy.

Authors:  Andreas Flury; Armando Hoch; Sandro Hodel; Florian B Imhoff; Sandro F Fucentese; Patrick O Zingg
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 4.342

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.