Literature DB >> 16819674

A simple method to minimize limb-length discrepancy after hip arthroplasty.

Kenta Matsuda1, Shigeru Nakamura, Takashi Matsushita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Limb-length discrepancy is not uncommon after total hip arthroplasty. To minimize such discrepancies, we introduced a simple method to select an appropriate modular head during surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used this method in 45 hips, and compared the outcome with that of a historical control group of 47 hips. Both groups received cement-less femoral components with modular heads of 4 different neck lengths. In the study group, we calculated the ideal distance between the center of the modular head and lesser trochanter on a preoperative AP radiograph. During surgery, we measured the actual distance between the center of trial heads and the lesser trochanter with a ruler, and selected the head in which the measured distance was closest to this distance. In the control group, we had selected a modular head based on preoperative planning.
RESULTS: The study group had a smaller mean postoperative limb-length discrepancy (2 (SD 2) mm) than the controls (7 (SD 4) mm).
INTERPRETATION: This simple technique reduces limb-length discrepancy after cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16819674     DOI: 10.1080/17453670610046280

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop        ISSN: 1745-3674            Impact factor:   3.717


  16 in total

1.  Preoperative radiographic assessment of limb-length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Geert Meermans; Ahmad Malik; Johan Witt; Fares Haddad
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Leg length discrepancy in total hip arthroplasty: comparison of two methods of measurement.

Authors:  Arkan S Sayed-Noor; Anders Hugo; Göran O Sjödén; Per Wretenberg
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Leg length discrepancy after total hip arthroplasty: a review of literature.

Authors:  Aravind S Desai; Asterios Dramis; Tim N Board
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-12

4.  Accuracy of the Horizontal Calibrator in Correcting Leg Length and Restoring Femoral Offset in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Shuxing Xing; Zhiyong Zhu; Huisheng Wang; Zhongshen Yu; Xizhuang Bai; Xi Li
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

5.  Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.

Authors:  Alfonso Manzotti; Pietro Cerveri; Elena De Momi; Chris Pullen; Norberto Confalonieri
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Accuracy of the relationship between the centre of the femoral head and tip of greater trochanter.

Authors:  Baljinder S Dhinsa; Aaron Saini; Alastair G Dick; William J Nash; Obinna Nzeako; Zameer Shah
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2018-08-24

7.  Total hip arthroplasty: leg length inequality impairs functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  Christoph Röder; Raphael Vogel; Lukas Burri; Daniel Dietrich; Lukas P Staub
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Intellijoint HIP®: a 3D mini-optical navigation tool for improving intraoperative accuracy during total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Wayne G Paprosky; Jeffrey M Muir
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-11-18

9.  Application of intraoperative limb-length measurement by a new osteotomy device in hemiarthroplasty for treating femoral neck fracture.

Authors:  Zhanle Zheng; Lei Yang; Yanling Su; Xian Yu; Zhiyong Hou; Yingze Zhang
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.102

10.  Hip joint load in relation to leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Per Wretenberg; Anders Hugo; Eva Broström
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2008-08-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.