Literature DB >> 33706701

Proposing a machine-learning based method to predict stillbirth before and during delivery and ranking the features: nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study.

Toktam Khatibi1, Elham Hanifi2, Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri2, Leila Allahqoli3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stillbirth is defined as fetal loss in pregnancy beyond 28 weeks by WHO. In this study, a machine-learning based method is proposed to predict stillbirth from livebirth and discriminate stillbirth before and during delivery and rank the features.
METHOD: A two-step stack ensemble classifier is proposed for classifying the instances into stillbirth and livebirth at the first step and then, classifying stillbirth before delivery from stillbirth during the labor at the second step. The proposed SE has two consecutive layers including the same classifiers. The base classifiers in each layer are decision tree, Gradient boosting classifier, logistics regression, random forest and support vector machines which are trained independently and aggregated based on Vote boosting method. Moreover, a new feature ranking method is proposed in this study based on mean decrease accuracy, Gini Index and model coefficients to find high-ranked features.
RESULTS: IMAN registry dataset is used in this study considering all births at or beyond 28th gestational week from 2016/04/01 to 2017/01/01 including 1,415,623 live birth and 5502 stillbirth cases. A combination of maternal demographic features, clinical history, fetal properties, delivery descriptors, environmental features, healthcare service provider descriptors and socio-demographic features are considered. The experimental results show that our proposed SE outperforms the compared classifiers with the average accuracy of 90%, sensitivity of 91%, specificity of 88%. The discrimination of the proposed SE is assessed and the average AUC of ±95%, CI of 90.51% ±1.08 and 90% ±1.12 is obtained on training dataset for model development and test dataset for external validation, respectively. The proposed SE is calibrated using isotopic nonparametric calibration method with the score of 0.07. The process is repeated 10,000 times and AUC of SE classifiers using random different training datasets as null distribution. The obtained p-value to assess the specificity of the proposed SE is 0.0126 which shows the significance of the proposed SE.
CONCLUSIONS: Gestational age and fetal height are two most important features for discriminating livebirth from stillbirth. Moreover, hospital, province, delivery main cause, perinatal abnormality, miscarriage number and maternal age are the most important features for classifying stillbirth before and during delivery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Classification; Ensemble learning; Feature selection; IMAN registry; Stillbirth prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33706701      PMCID: PMC7953639          DOI: 10.1186/s12884-021-03658-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth        ISSN: 1471-2393            Impact factor:   3.007


  23 in total

1.  Maternal education and stillbirth: estimating gestational-age-specific and cause-specific associations.

Authors:  Nathalie Auger; Pauline Delézire; Sam Harper; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 2.  Predicting antepartum stillbirth.

Authors:  Gordon C S Smith
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 3.  Prediction and prevention of recurrent stillbirth.

Authors:  Uma M Reddy
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 4.  Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vicki Flenady; Laura Koopmans; Philippa Middleton; J Frederik Frøen; Gordon C Smith; Kristen Gibbons; Michael Coory; Adrienne Gordon; David Ellwood; Harold David McIntyre; Ruth Fretts; Majid Ezzati
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Cascaded classifiers and stacking methods for classification of pulmonary nodule characteristics.

Authors:  Aydin Kaya
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Prediction of stillbirth from biochemical and biophysical markers at 11-13 weeks.

Authors:  S Mastrodima; R Akolekar; G Yerlikaya; T Tzelepis; K H Nicolaides
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 7.299

Review 7.  Stillbirth: fetal disorders.

Authors:  Richard M Pauli
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.190

8.  Stillbirth and the small fetus: use of a sex-specific versus a non-sex-specific growth standard.

Authors:  A S Trudell; A G Cahill; M G Tuuli; G A Macones; A O Odibo
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.521

9.  Risk factors for stillbirths: how much can a responsive health system prevent?

Authors:  Sutapa Bandyopadhyay Neogi; Jyoti Sharma; Preeti Negandhi; Monika Chauhan; Siddharth Reddy; Ghanashyam Sethy
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  Stillbirth risk prediction using machine learning for a large cohort of births from Western Australia, 1980-2015.

Authors:  Eva Malacova; Sawitchaya Tippaya; Helen D Bailey; Kevin Chai; Brad M Farrant; Amanuel T Gebremedhin; Helen Leonard; Michael L Marinovich; Natasha Nassar; Aloke Phatak; Camille Raynes-Greenow; Annette K Regan; Antonia W Shand; Carrington C J Shepherd; Ravisha Srinivasjois; Gizachew A Tessema; Gavin Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  3 in total

1.  Performance Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithm for Classification of Unintended Pregnancy among Married Women in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Md Ismail Hossain; Md Jakaria Habib; Ahmed Abdus Saleh Saleheen; Md Kamruzzaman; Azizur Rahman; Sutopa Roy; Md Amit Hasan; Iqramul Haq; Md Injamul Haq Methun; Md Iqbal Hossain Nayan; Md Rukonozzaman Rukon
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 3.822

2.  Machine learning algorithms as new screening approach for patients with endometriosis.

Authors:  Sofiane Bendifallah; Anne Puchar; Stéphane Suisse; Léa Delbos; Mathieu Poilblanc; Philippe Descamps; Francois Golfier; Cyril Touboul; Yohann Dabi; Emile Daraï
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses.

Authors:  Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.