Literature DB >> 27561595

Prediction of stillbirth from biochemical and biophysical markers at 11-13 weeks.

S Mastrodima1, R Akolekar1,2, G Yerlikaya1, T Tzelepis1, K H Nicolaides1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a model for the prediction of stillbirth that is based on a combination of maternal characteristics and medical history with first-trimester biochemical and biophysical markers and to evaluate the performance of screening with this model for all stillbirths and those due to impaired placentation and unexplained causes.
METHODS: This was a prospective screening study of 76 897 singleton pregnancies, including 76 629 live births and 268 (0.35%) antepartum stillbirths; 157 (59%) were secondary to impaired placentation and 111 (41%) were due to other or unexplained causes. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to determine if there was a significant contribution to prediction of stillbirth from the maternal factor-derived a-priori risk, fetal nuchal translucency thickness, ductus venosus pulsatility index for veins (DV-PIV), uterine artery pulsatility index (UtA-PI) and maternal serum free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A). The significant contributors were used to derive a model for first-trimester prediction of stillbirth.
RESULTS: Significant contribution to prediction of stillbirth was provided by maternal factors, PAPP-A, UtA-PI and DV-PIV. A model combining these variables predicted 40% of all stillbirths and 55% of those due to impaired placentation, at a false-positive rate of 10%. Within the impaired-placentation group, the detection rate of stillbirth < 32 weeks' gestation was higher than that of stillbirth ≥ 37 weeks (64% vs 42%).
CONCLUSIONS: A model based on maternal factors and first-trimester biomarkers can potentially predict more than half of subsequent stillbirths that occur due to impaired placentation. The extent to which such stillbirths could be prevented remains to be determined.
Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ductus venosus Doppler; first-trimester screening; pyramid of pregnancy care; serum PAPP-A; stillbirth; uterine artery Doppler

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27561595     DOI: 10.1002/uog.17289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  10 in total

1.  Predictive Model for Late Stillbirth Among Antenatal Hypertensive Women.

Authors:  Manisha Kumar; V Ravi; Deepika Meena; Kanika Chopra; Shilpi Nain; Manju Puri
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2021-09-20

2.  Predicting delivery of a small-for-gestational-age infant and adverse perinatal outcome in women with suspected pre-eclampsia.

Authors:  M Griffin; P T Seed; S Duckworth; R North; J Myers; L Mackillop; N Simpson; J Waugh; D Anumba; L C Kenny; C W G Redman; A H Shennan; L C Chappell
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 7.299

3.  The prediction of early preeclampsia: Results from a longitudinal proteomics study.

Authors:  Adi L Tarca; Roberto Romero; Neta Benshalom-Tirosh; Nandor Gabor Than; Dereje W Gudicha; Bogdan Done; Percy Pacora; Tinnakorn Chaiworapongsa; Bogdan Panaitescu; Dan Tirosh; Nardhy Gomez-Lopez; Sorin Draghici; Sonia S Hassan; Offer Erez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Perinatal death investigations: What is current practice?

Authors:  J W Nijkamp; N J Sebire; K Bouman; F J Korteweg; J J H M Erwich; S J Gordijn
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  Synthetic minority oversampling of vital statistics data with generative adversarial networks.

Authors:  Aki Koivu; Mikko Sairanen; Antti Airola; Tapio Pahikkala
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 4.497

6.  Proposing a machine-learning based method to predict stillbirth before and during delivery and ranking the features: nationwide retrospective cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Toktam Khatibi; Elham Hanifi; Mohammad Mehdi Sepehri; Leila Allahqoli
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Prediction of stillbirth in women with overweight or obesity-A register-based cohort study.

Authors:  H Åmark; M Westgren; M Persson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The ability of late pregnancy maternal tests to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes associated with placental dysfunction (specifically fetal growth restriction and pre-eclampsia): a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of prognostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Melanie Griffin; Alexander E P Heazell; Lucy C Chappell; Jian Zhao; Deborah A Lawlor
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-08

Review 9.  First Trimester Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes-Identifying Pregnancies at Risk from as Early as 11-13 Weeks.

Authors:  Alexandra Bouariu; Anca Maria Panaitescu; Kypros H Nicolaides
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Reducing health inequality in Black, Asian and other minority ethnic pregnant women: impact of first trimester combined screening for placental dysfunction on perinatal mortality.

Authors:  Becky Liu; Usaama Nadeem; Alexander Frick; Morakinyo Alakaloko; Amar Bhide; Basky Thilaganathan
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 7.331

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.