Yen Lin Chen1, Thomas M Baker1, Frank Lee2, Bo Shui2, Jane C Lee2, Petr Tvrdik3, Michael I Kotlikoff2, Swapnil K Sonkusare4,5. 1. Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA. 3. Departments of Neurosurgery and Neuroscience and Bioengineering, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. 4. Robert M. Berne Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA, sks2n@virginia.edu. 5. Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA, sks2n@virginia.edu.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Studies in Cx40-GCaMP2 mice, which express calcium biosensor GCaMP2 in the endothelium under connexin 40 promoter, have identified the unique properties of endothelial calcium signals. However, Cx40-GCaMP2 mouse is associated with a narrow dynamic range and lack of signal in the venous endothelium. Recent studies have proposed many GCaMPs (GCaMP5/6/7/8) with improved properties although their performance in endothelium-specific calcium studies is not known. METHODS: We characterized a newly developed mouse line that constitutively expresses GCaMP8 in the endothelium under the VE-cadherin (Cdh5-GCaMP8) promoter. Calcium signals through endothelial IP3 receptors and TRP vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) ion channels were recorded in mesenteric arteries (MAs) and veins from Cdh5-GCaMP8 and Cx40-GCaMP2 mice. RESULTS: Cdh5-GCaMP8 mice showed lower baseline fluorescence intensity, higher dynamic range, and higher amplitudes of individual calcium signals than Cx40-GCaMP2 mice. Importantly, Cdh5-GCaMP8 mice enabled the first recordings of discrete calcium signals in the intact venous endothelium and revealed striking differences in IP3 receptor and TRPV4 channel calcium signals between MAs and mesenteric veins. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Cdh5-GCaMP8 mice represent significant improvements in dynamic range, sensitivity for low-intensity signals, and the ability to record calcium signals in venous endothelium.
INTRODUCTION: Studies in Cx40-GCaMP2 mice, which express calcium biosensor GCaMP2 in the endothelium under connexin 40 promoter, have identified the unique properties of endothelial calcium signals. However, Cx40-GCaMP2 mouse is associated with a narrow dynamic range and lack of signal in the venous endothelium. Recent studies have proposed many GCaMPs (GCaMP5/6/7/8) with improved properties although their performance in endothelium-specific calcium studies is not known. METHODS: We characterized a newly developed mouse line that constitutively expresses GCaMP8 in the endothelium under the VE-cadherin (Cdh5-GCaMP8) promoter. Calcium signals through endothelial IP3 receptors and TRP vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) ion channels were recorded in mesenteric arteries (MAs) and veins from Cdh5-GCaMP8 and Cx40-GCaMP2 mice. RESULTS: Cdh5-GCaMP8 mice showed lower baseline fluorescence intensity, higher dynamic range, and higher amplitudes of individual calcium signals than Cx40-GCaMP2 mice. Importantly, Cdh5-GCaMP8 mice enabled the first recordings of discrete calcium signals in the intact venous endothelium and revealed striking differences in IP3 receptor and TRPV4 channel calcium signals between MAs and mesenteric veins. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that Cdh5-GCaMP8 mice represent significant improvements in dynamic range, sensitivity for low-intensity signals, and the ability to record calcium signals in venous endothelium.
Authors: Hod Dana; Yi Sun; Boaz Mohar; Brad K Hulse; Aaron M Kerlin; Jeremy P Hasseman; Getahun Tsegaye; Arthur Tsang; Allan Wong; Ronak Patel; John J Macklin; Yang Chen; Arthur Konnerth; Vivek Jayaraman; Loren L Looger; Eric R Schreiter; Karel Svoboda; Douglas S Kim Journal: Nat Methods Date: 2019-06-17 Impact factor: 28.547
Authors: Swapnil K Sonkusare; Adrian D Bonev; Jonathan Ledoux; Wolfgang Liedtke; Michael I Kotlikoff; Thomas J Heppner; David C Hill-Eubanks; Mark T Nelson Journal: Science Date: 2012-05-04 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Jay S Naik; Jessica M Osmond; Benjimen R Walker; Nancy L Kanagy Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-10-07 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Lars Kaestner; Anke Scholz; Qinghai Tian; Sandra Ruppenthal; Wiebke Tabellion; Kathrina Wiesen; Hugo A Katus; Oliver J Müller; Michael I Kotlikoff; Peter Lipp Journal: Circ Res Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Yvonne N Tallini; Masamichi Ohkura; Bum-Rak Choi; Guangju Ji; Keiji Imoto; Robert Doran; Jane Lee; Patricia Plan; Jason Wilson; Hong-Bo Xin; Atsushi Sanbe; James Gulick; John Mathai; Jeffrey Robbins; Guy Salama; Junichi Nakai; Michael I Kotlikoff Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2006-03-13 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: J Michael Gee; Nathan A Smith; Fernando R Fernandez; Michael N Economo; Daniela Brunert; Markus Rothermel; S Craig Morris; Amy Talbot; Sierra Palumbos; Jennifer M Ichida; Jason D Shepherd; Peter J West; Matt Wachowiak; Mario R Capecchi; Karen S Wilcox; John A White; Petr Tvrdik Journal: Neuron Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Emily C Peters; Michael T Gee; Lukas N Pawlowski; Allison M Kath; Felipe D Polk; Christopher J Vance; Juliana L Sacoman; Paulo W Pires Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2021-08-31 Impact factor: 6.960