Isha Sekhon1, Elizabeth N Pearce2, Xuemei He2, Sun Y Lee3. 1. Nutrition and Metabolism, Graduate Medical Sciences, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston. 2. Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston. 3. Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston. Electronic address: sun.lee@bmc.org.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Iodine is essential for thyroid hormone production. The recommended dietary allowance for iodine in nonpregnant adults is 150 μg/d. However, most product labels do not list the iodine content. Meal replacements are not required to contain specific vitamins and minerals. Nevertheless, they are often marketed as good and convenient sources of a balanced nutrition. In this study, we aimed to assess the iodine content in meal replacements to determine how they may contribute to iodine deficiency or excess. METHODS: Twenty seven meal replacements from supermarkets in the Boston area were collected. The iodine concentration of each meal replacement was measured spectrophotometrically. Iodine content in meal replacements were compared according to form (liquid, bar, and powder) and type (vegan and nonvegan). RESULTS: The overall mean ± SD iodine content was 49.7 ± 125.4 μg/serving. However, 1 meal replacement was an outlier and had 671.9 μg iodine per serving. Mean iodine content differed between forms and was highest for liquids (mean ± SD: 37.4 ± 6.5 μg/serving). Nonvegan meal replacements had a higher mean iodine content than vegan meal replacements (mean ± SD: 31.6 ± 15.78 μg/serving). CONCLUSION: All of the meal replacements contained detectible amounts of iodine regardless of whether it was listed on their labels (41% did not list iodine). Overall, the meal replacements in this study were found to be good sources of iodine. However, consumers should be aware that packaging labels may not accurately reflect the amount of iodine present.
OBJECTIVE: Iodine is essential for thyroid hormone production. The recommended dietary allowance for iodine in nonpregnant adults is 150 μg/d. However, most product labels do not list the iodine content. Meal replacements are not required to contain specific vitamins and minerals. Nevertheless, they are often marketed as good and convenient sources of a balanced nutrition. In this study, we aimed to assess the iodine content in meal replacements to determine how they may contribute to iodine deficiency or excess. METHODS: Twenty seven meal replacements from supermarkets in the Boston area were collected. The iodine concentration of each meal replacement was measured spectrophotometrically. Iodine content in meal replacements were compared according to form (liquid, bar, and powder) and type (vegan and nonvegan). RESULTS: The overall mean ± SD iodine content was 49.7 ± 125.4 μg/serving. However, 1 meal replacement was an outlier and had 671.9 μg iodine per serving. Mean iodine content differed between forms and was highest for liquids (mean ± SD: 37.4 ± 6.5 μg/serving). Nonvegan meal replacements had a higher mean iodine content than vegan meal replacements (mean ± SD: 31.6 ± 15.78 μg/serving). CONCLUSION: All of the meal replacements contained detectible amounts of iodine regardless of whether it was listed on their labels (41% did not list iodine). Overall, the meal replacements in this study were found to be good sources of iodine. However, consumers should be aware that packaging labels may not accurately reflect the amount of iodine present.
Authors: Angela M Leung; Andrew Lamar; Xuemei He; Lewis E Braverman; Elizabeth N Pearce Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Olivia L van der Reijden; Michael B Zimmermann; Valeria Galetti Journal: Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2017-10-20 Impact factor: 4.690
Authors: Clarence William Murray; Sara Kathleen Egan; Henry Kim; Nega Beru; Philip Michael Bolger Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2008-01-02 Impact factor: 5.563
Authors: Jean M Kerver; Elizabeth N Pearce; Tengfei Ma; Monica Gentchev; Michael R Elliott; Nigel Paneth Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 8.661