Literature DB >> 3369487

Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study.

B L Flamm1, O W Lim, C Jones, D Fallon, L A Newman, J K Mantis.   

Abstract

Cesarean section is now the most frequently performed major operation in the United States. Nearly one out of every four American babies is delivered by this operation. "Elective repeat" has become the most common indication for cesarean section. Although the safety of vaginal birth after cesarean section has been documented in several recent publications, automatic repeat cesarean section remains the rule in this country. We present one of the largest series of trial of labor ever reported. Of 57,553 live births, 4929 (8.6%) were of women with prior cesarean sections. Among 1776 patients who underwent a trial of labor, 1314 (74%) delivered vaginally. There was no maternal or perinatal mortality related to uterine scar rupture. Thus during the study period 1314 major operations were avoided. We conclude that, for the vast majority of women, allowing a trial of labor is a safe alternative to automatic elective repeat cesarean section.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3369487     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90224-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  13 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the incidence and consequences of uterine rupture in women with previous caesarean section.

Authors:  Jeanne-Marie Guise; Marian S McDonagh; Patricia Osterweil; Peggy Nygren; Benjamin K S Chan; Mark Helfand
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-07-03

2.  Experiment and illusion in reproductive medicine.

Authors:  J Guillemin
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-03

Review 3.  [Recent standards in management of obstetric anesthesia].

Authors:  Maximiliaan van Erp; Clemens Ortner; Stefan Jochberger; Klaus Ulrich Klein
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-07-25

4.  Rates and success rates of trial of labor after cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990-2009.

Authors:  Sayeedha F G Uddin; Alan E Simon
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-09

5.  Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Karen B Eden; Nicole Marshall; Leonardo Pereira; Aaron B Caughey; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 6.  Delivery after previous cesarean: short-term perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Ravi M Patel; Lucky Jain
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 7.  A risk-benefit assessment of oxytocics in obstetric practice.

Authors:  M Winkler; W Rath
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.606

8.  Scar thickness measurement by transvaginal sonography in late second trimester and third trimester in pregnant patients with previous cesarean section: does sequential change in scar thickness with gestational age correlate with mode of delivery?

Authors:  Nilanchali Singh; Reva Tripathi; Y M Mala; Rashmi Dixit
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-07-16

9.  Reducing the cesarean section rate in a rural community hospital.

Authors:  S Iglesias; R Burn; L D Saunders
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  Cesarean section use and source of payment: an analysis of California hospital discharge abstracts.

Authors:  R S Stafford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.