Literature DB >> 33692945

Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node.

Shuai Li1, Yangzi Zhang1, Yang Yu2, Xianggao Zhu1, Jianhao Geng1, Huajing Teng1, Zhilong Wang3, Tingting Sun2, Lin Wang2, Hongzhi Wang1, Yongheng Li1, Aiwen Wu2, Yong Cai1, Weihu Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: The optimal treatment modality for clinically positive lateral pelvic lymph node (LPLN) from locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is unknown. Thus, we aimed to analyze the optimal radiotherapy dose for clinically positive LPLN from LARC.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated distal LARC (i.e., within 8 cm from the anal verge) patients with clinically positive LPLN (i.e., ≥7 mm in the short axis). They were divided into two groups based on whether or not they received simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy (SIB-IMRT)-based chemoradiotherapy. The total radiotherapy dose on LPLN were 56-60Gy for SIB-IMRT group and 41.8Gy for non-SIB-IMRT group. The clinical parameters and regrowth rate of LPLN were then compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were evaluated, and 83 and 68 patients were classified to the SIB-IMRT and non-SIB-IMRT group, respectively. The median follow-up period was 22.6 months, and the 2-year LPLN regrowth rate was significantly different between the SIB-IMRT group and the non-SIB-IMRT group (0% vs 10.8%, P=0.024). Further, SIB-IMRT yielded a significantly lower 2-year LPLN regrowth rate in patients whose LPLN measured ≥8 mm in the short axis (0% vs. 15.9%, P=0.019) or ≥10 mm in the long axis (0% vs. 17.6%, P=0.024) compared to patients who were in non-SIB-IMRT group. Meanwhile, there was no significant difference in grade II radiation-related toxicity (30.1% vs. 39.1%, P=0.217) and surgical complications (21.8% vs. 12.2%, P=0.198) between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: SIB-IMRT-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is beneficial for eliminating clinically positive LPLN from LARC without increasing the incidence of radiotherapy-related toxicity and surgical complications, and patients with larger LPLN may gain benefit from this technique.
Copyright © 2021 Li, Zhang, Yu, Zhu, Geng, Teng, Wang, Sun, Wang, Wang, Li, Wu, Cai and Wang.

Entities:  

Keywords:  disease-free survival; lateral pelvic lymph node; local advanced rectal cancer; neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; regrowth rate; simultaneous integrated boost intensity-modulated radiation therapy

Year:  2021        PMID: 33692945      PMCID: PMC7937798          DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.627572

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Oncol        ISSN: 2234-943X            Impact factor:   6.244


  38 in total

1.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2010 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Toshiaki Watanabe; Michio Itabashi; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shinji Tanaka; Yoshinori Ito; Yoichi Ajioka; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Ichinosuke Hyodo; Masahiro Igarashi; Hideyuki Ishida; Megumi Ishiguro; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Norihiro Kokudo; Kei Muro; Atsushi Ochiai; Masahiko Oguchi; Yasuo Ohkura; Yutaka Saito; Yoshiharu Sakai; Hideki Ueno; Takayuki Yoshino; Takahiro Fujimori; Nobuo Koinuma; Takayuki Morita; Genichi Nishimura; Yuh Sakata; Keiichi Takahashi; Hiroya Takiuchi; Osamu Tsuruta; Toshiharu Yamaguchi; Masahiro Yoshida; Naohiko Yamaguchi; Kenjiro Kotake; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-10-15       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  B Glimelius; E Tiret; A Cervantes; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Correlations between the Recurrence Patterns and Sizes of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes before and after Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Lower Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hiroshi Shiratori; Kazushige Kawai; Keisuke Hata; Toshiaki Tanaka; Takeshi Nishikawa; Kazuhito Sasaki; Manabu Kaneko; Koji Murono; Shigenobu Emoto; Teppei Morikawa; Masashi Fukayama; Hiroaki Nozawa
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 2.935

Review 4.  Extended lymphadenectomy versus conventional surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Panagiotis Georgiou; Emile Tan; Nikolaos Gouvas; Anthony Antoniou; Gina Brown; R John Nicholls; Paris Tekkis
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicentre, phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Oliver S Chow; David D Smith; Jorge E Marcet; Peter A Cataldo; Madhulika G Varma; Anjali S Kumar; Samuel Oommen; Theodore Coutsoftides; Steven R Hunt; Michael J Stamos; Charles A Ternent; Daniel O Herzig; Alessandro Fichera; Blase N Polite; David W Dietz; Sujata Patil; Karin Avila
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 41.316

6.  Urinary dysfunction after rectal cancer surgery: Results from a randomized trial comparing mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for clinical stage II or III lower rectal cancer (Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study, JCOG0212).

Authors:  Masaaki Ito; Akihiro Kobayashi; Shin Fujita; Junki Mizusawa; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Yusuke Kinugasa; Koji Komori; Masayuki Ohue; Mitsuyoshi Ota; Yoshihiro Akazai; Manabu Shiozawa; Takashi Yamaguchi; Takayuki Akasu; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 4.424

7.  Indications for Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Before and After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Advanced Low-Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Takashi Akiyoshi; Kiyoshi Matsueda; Makiko Hiratsuka; Toshiyuki Unno; Jun Nagata; Toshiya Nagasaki; Tsuyoshi Konishi; Yoshiya Fujimoto; Satoshi Nagayama; Yosuke Fukunaga; Masashi Ueno
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Techniques and trouble-shooting in high spatial resolution thin slice MRI for rectal cancer.

Authors:  G Brown; I R Daniels; C Richardson; P Revell; D Peppercorn; M Bourne
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  A comparison between the treatment of low rectal cancer in Japan and the Netherlands, focusing on the patterns of local recurrence.

Authors:  Miranda Kusters; Geerard L Beets; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Corrie A M Marijnen; Harm J T Rutten; Hein Putter; Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial.

Authors:  E Fokas; R Fietkau; A Hartmann; W Hohenberger; R Grützmann; M Ghadimi; T Liersch; P Ströbel; G G Grabenbauer; U Graeven; R-D Hofheinz; C-H Köhne; C Wittekind; R Sauer; M Kaufmann; T Hothorn; C Rödel
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 32.976

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Role of Simultaneous Integrated Boost in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes.

Authors:  Elisa Meldolesi; Giuditta Chiloiro; Roberta Giannini; Roberta Menghi; Roberto Persiani; Barbara Corvari; Claudio Coco; Stefania Manfrida; Carlo Ratto; Viola De Luca; Luigi Sofo; Sara Reina; Antonio Crucitti; Valeria Masiello; Nicola Dinapoli; Vincenzo Valentini; Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 6.639

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.