Literature DB >> 29718095

Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial.

E Fokas1, R Fietkau2, A Hartmann3, W Hohenberger4, R Grützmann4, M Ghadimi5, T Liersch5, P Ströbel6, G G Grabenbauer7, U Graeven8, R-D Hofheinz9, C-H Köhne10, C Wittekind11, R Sauer2, M Kaufmann12, T Hothorn12, C Rödel13.   

Abstract

Background: Surrogate end points in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation are lacking as their statistical validation poses major challenges, including confirmation based on large phase III trials. We examined the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score that incorporates weighted cT, ypT and ypN categories for disease-free survival (DFS) in 1191 patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods: Cox regression models adjusted for treatment arm, resection status, and NAR score were used in multivariable analysis. The four Prentice criteria (PC1-4) were used to assess individual-level surrogacy of NAR for DFS.
Results: After a median follow-up of 50 months, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved 3-year DFS [75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.30% to 79.50%) versus 71.3% (95% CI 67.60% to 74.90%); P = 0.034; PC 1) and resulted in a shift toward lower NAR groups (P = 0.034, PC 2) compared with fluorouracil-only CRT. The 3-year DFS was 91.7% (95% CI 88.2% to 95.2%), 81.8% (95% CI 78.4% to 85.1%), and 58.1% (95% CI 52.4% to 63.9%) for low, intermediate, and high NAR score, respectively (P < 0.001; PC 3). NAR score remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS [low versus high NAR: hazard ratio (HR) 4.670; 95% CI 3.106-7.020; P < 0.001; low versus intermediate NAR: HR 1.971; 95% CI 1.303-2.98; P = 0.001] in multivariable analysis. Notwithstanding the inherent methodological difficulty in interpretation of PC 4 to establish surrogacy, the treatment effect on DFS was captured by NAR, supporting satisfaction of individual-level PC 4.
Conclusion: Our study validates the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of NAR score for DFS within a large randomized phase III trial. NAR score could help oncologists to speed up response-adapted therapeutic decision, and further large phase III trial data sets should aim to confirm trial-level surrogacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29718095     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  17 in total

1.  College of American Pathologists Tumor Regression Grading System for Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Hai-Yang Chen; Li-Li Feng; Ming Li; Huai-Qiang Ju; Yi Ding; Mei Lan; Shu-Mei Song; Wei-Dong Han; Li Yu; Ming-Biao Wei; Xiao-Lin Pang; Fang He; Shuai Liu; Jian Zheng; Yan Ma; Chu-Yang Lin; Ping Lan; Mei-Jin Huang; Yi-Feng Zou; Zu-Li Yang; Ting Wang; Jin-Yi Lang; Guy R Orangio; Vitaliy Poylin; Jaffer A Ajani; Wei-Hu Wang; Xiang-Bo Wan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-02-22

2.  Neoadjuvant rectal score: run with the hare and hunt with the hounds.

Authors:  F Sclafani; E Kalaitzaki; D Cunningham; D Tait; G Brown; I Chau
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 3.  National Cancer Institute (NCI) state of the science: Targeted radiosensitizers in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J George; Aaron J Franke; A Bapsi Chakravarthy; Prajnan Das; Arvind Dasari; Bassel F El-Rayes; Theodore S Hong; Timothy J Kinsella; Jerome C Landry; James J Lee; Arta M Monjazeb; Samuel A Jacobs; David Raben; Osama E Rahma; Terence M Williams; Christina Wu; C Norman Coleman; Bhadrasain Vikram; Mansoor M Ahmed
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Scores in Preoperative Short-Course Radiotherapy and Long-Course Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Shih Huang; Feng-Che Kuan; Meng-Hung Lin; Miao-Fen Chen; Wen-Cheng Chen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Total neoadjuvant therapy vs standard therapy of locally advanced rectal cancer with high-risk factors for failure.

Authors:  Mojca Tuta; Nina Boc; Erik Brecelj; Monika Peternel; Vaneja Velenik
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15

Review 6.  Tumor Suppressor Protein p53 and Inhibitor of Apoptosis Proteins in Colorectal Cancer-A Promising Signaling Network for Therapeutic Interventions.

Authors:  Ömer Güllülü; Stephanie Hehlgans; Claus Rödel; Emmanouil Fokas; Franz Rödel
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 6.639

7.  Total Neoadjuvant Therapy vs Standard Therapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anup Kasi; Saqib Abbasi; Shivani Handa; Raed Al-Rajabi; Anwaar Saeed; Joaquina Baranda; Weijing Sun
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

8.  Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with rectal cancer.

Authors:  Fang He; Li Yu; Yi Ding; Zhen-Hui Li; Jian Wang; Jian Zheng; Hai-Yang Chen; Shuai Liu; Xiao-Lin Pang; Jaffer A Ajani; Xiang-Bo Wan
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.716

9.  Simultaneous Integrated Boost Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Can Benefit the Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients With Clinically Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node.

Authors:  Shuai Li; Yangzi Zhang; Yang Yu; Xianggao Zhu; Jianhao Geng; Huajing Teng; Zhilong Wang; Tingting Sun; Lin Wang; Hongzhi Wang; Yongheng Li; Aiwen Wu; Yong Cai; Weihu Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  A phase 1 trial of the safety, tolerability and biological effects of intravenous Enadenotucirev, a novel oncolytic virus, in combination with chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (CEDAR).

Authors:  Séan M O'Cathail; Steven Davis; Jane Holmes; Richard Brown; Kerry Fisher; Leonard Seymour; Richard Adams; James Good; David Sebag-Montefiore; Tim Maughan; Maria A Hawkins
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.