Julio Garcia-Aguilar1, Oliver S Chow2, David D Smith3, Jorge E Marcet4, Peter A Cataldo5, Madhulika G Varma6, Anjali S Kumar7, Samuel Oommen8, Theodore Coutsoftides9, Steven R Hunt10, Michael J Stamos11, Charles A Ternent12, Daniel O Herzig13, Alessandro Fichera14, Blase N Polite15, David W Dietz16, Sujata Patil17, Karin Avila2. 1. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: garciaaj@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Division of Biostatistics, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA. 4. Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 5. Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. 6. Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA. 7. Department of Surgery, MedStar Health Research Institute, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA. 8. Department of Surgery, John Muir Health, Concord, CA, USA. 9. Department of Surgery, St Joseph Hospital, Orange County, CA, USA. 10. Department of Surgery, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA. 11. Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. 12. Department of Surgery, Creighton University Medical Center, University of Nebraska College of Medicine, Omaha, NE, USA. 13. Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 14. Department of Surgery, UW Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA. 15. Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 16. Department of Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. 17. Division of Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation have an improved prognosis. The need for surgery in these patients has been questioned, but the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response is small. We aimed to assess whether adding cycles of mFOLFOX6 between chemoradiation and surgery increased the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. METHODS: We did a phase 2, non-randomised trial consisting of four sequential study groups of patients with stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer at 17 institutions in the USA and Canada. All patients received chemoradiation (fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion throughout radiotherapy, and 45·0 Gy in 25 fractions, 5 days per week for 5 weeks, followed by a minimum boost of 5·4 Gy). Patients in group 1 had total mesorectal excision 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Patients in groups 2-4 received two, four, or six cycles of mFOLFOX6, respectively, between chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Each cycle of mFOLFOX6 consisted of racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) or 400 mg/m(2), according to the discretion of the treating investigator, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and a 46-h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00335816. FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2004, and Nov 16, 2012, 292 patients were registered, 259 of whom (60 in group 1, 67 in group 2, 67 in group 3, and 65 in group 4) met criteria for analysis. 11 (18%, 95% CI 10-30) of 60 patients in group 1, 17 (25%, 16-37) of 67 in group 2, 20 (30%, 19-42) of 67 in group 3, and 25 (38%, 27-51) of 65 in group 4 achieved a pathological complete response (p=0·0036). Study group was independently associated with pathological complete response (group 4 compared with group 1 odds ratio 3·49, 95% CI 1·39-8·75; p=0·011). In group 2, two (3%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 and one (1%) had a grade 4 adverse event; in group 3, 12 (18%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events; in group 4, 18 (28%) of 65 patients had grade 3 adverse events and five (8%) had grade 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 across groups 2-4 were neutropenia (five in group 3 and six in group 4) and lymphopenia (three in group 3 and four in group 4). Across all study groups, 25 grade 3 or worse surgery-related complications occurred (ten in group 1, five in group 2, three in group 3, and seven in group 4); the most common were pelvic abscesses (seven patients) and anastomotic leaks (seven patients). INTERPRETATION: Delivery of mFOLFOX6 after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision has the potential to increase the proportion of patients eligible for less invasive treatment strategies; this strategy is being tested in phase 3 clinical trials. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.
BACKGROUND:Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who achieve a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation have an improved prognosis. The need for surgery in these patients has been questioned, but the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response is small. We aimed to assess whether adding cycles of mFOLFOX6 between chemoradiation and surgery increased the proportion of patients achieving a pathological complete response. METHODS: We did a phase 2, non-randomised trial consisting of four sequential study groups of patients with stage II-III locally advanced rectal cancer at 17 institutions in the USA and Canada. All patients received chemoradiation (fluorouracil 225 mg/m(2) per day by continuous infusion throughout radiotherapy, and 45·0 Gy in 25 fractions, 5 days per week for 5 weeks, followed by a minimum boost of 5·4 Gy). Patients in group 1 had total mesorectal excision 6-8 weeks after chemoradiation. Patients in groups 2-4 received two, four, or six cycles of mFOLFOX6, respectively, between chemoradiation and total mesorectal excision. Each cycle of mFOLFOX6 consisted of racemic leucovorin 200 mg/m(2) or 400 mg/m(2), according to the discretion of the treating investigator, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) in a 2-h infusion, bolus fluorouracil 400 mg/m(2) on day 1, and a 46-h infusion of fluorouracil 2400 mg/m(2). The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a pathological complete response, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00335816. FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2004, and Nov 16, 2012, 292 patients were registered, 259 of whom (60 in group 1, 67 in group 2, 67 in group 3, and 65 in group 4) met criteria for analysis. 11 (18%, 95% CI 10-30) of 60 patients in group 1, 17 (25%, 16-37) of 67 in group 2, 20 (30%, 19-42) of 67 in group 3, and 25 (38%, 27-51) of 65 in group 4 achieved a pathological complete response (p=0·0036). Study group was independently associated with pathological complete response (group 4 compared with group 1 odds ratio 3·49, 95% CI 1·39-8·75; p=0·011). In group 2, two (3%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 and one (1%) had a grade 4 adverse event; in group 3, 12 (18%) of 67 patients had grade 3 adverse events; in group 4, 18 (28%) of 65 patients had grade 3 adverse events and five (8%) had grade 4 adverse events. The most common grade 3 or higher adverse events associated with the neoadjuvant administration of mFOLFOX6 across groups 2-4 were neutropenia (five in group 3 and six in group 4) and lymphopenia (three in group 3 and four in group 4). Across all study groups, 25 grade 3 or worse surgery-related complications occurred (ten in group 1, five in group 2, three in group 3, and seven in group 4); the most common were pelvic abscesses (seven patients) and anastomotic leaks (seven patients). INTERPRETATION: Delivery of mFOLFOX6after chemoradiation and before total mesorectal excision has the potential to increase the proportion of patients eligible for less invasive treatment strategies; this strategy is being tested in phase 3 clinical trials. FUNDING: National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute.
Authors: Rolf Sauer; Heinz Becker; Werner Hohenberger; Claus Rödel; Christian Wittekind; Rainer Fietkau; Peter Martus; Jörg Tschmelitsch; Eva Hager; Clemens F Hess; Johann-H Karstens; Torsten Liersch; Heinz Schmidberger; Rudolf Raab Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-21 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Supiot; J Bennouna; E Rio; G Meurette; E Bardet; B Buecher; F Dravet; J-C Le Neel; J-Y Douillard; M-A Mahé; P-A Lehur Journal: Colorectal Dis Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.788
Authors: Felipe A Calvo; Virginia Morillo; Marcos Santos; Javier Serrano; Marina Gomez-Espí; Marcos Rodriguez; Emilio Del Vale; Jose Luis Gracia-Sabrido; Carlos Ferrer; Claudio Sole Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-01 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Larissa K Temple; Jennifer Bacik; Salvatore G Savatta; Lester Gottesman; Philip B Paty; Martin R Weiser; José G Guillem; Bruce D Minsky; Michelle Kalman; Howard T Thaler; Deborah Schrag; W Douglas Wong Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2005-07 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: F A Calvo; F J Serrano; J A Diaz-González; M Gomez-Espi; E Lozano; R Garcia; D de la Mata; J A Arranz; P García-Alfonso; G Pérez-Manga; E Alvarez Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-05-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: J D Brierley; B J Cummings; C S Wong; T J Keane; B O'Sullivan; C N Catton; P Goodman Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1995-01-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Campbell S D Roxburgh; Paul Strombom; Patricio Lynn; Mithat Gonen; Philip B Paty; Jose G Guillem; Garrett M Nash; J Joshua Smith; Iris Wei; Emmanouil Pappou; Julio Garcia-Aguilar; Martin R Weiser Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 5.344