Literature DB >> 33692720

Sensitivity to Sunk Costs Depends on Attention to the Delay.

Rebecca Kazinka1, Angus W MacDonald2, A David Redish3.   

Abstract

In the WebSurf task, humans forage for videos paying costs in terms of wait times on a time-limited task. A variant of the task in which demands during the wait time were manipulated revealed the role of attention in susceptibility to sunk costs. Consistent with parallel tasks in rodents, previous studies have found that humans (undergraduates measured in lab) preferred shorter delays, but waited longer for more preferred videos, suggesting that they were treating the delays economically. In an Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk) sample, we replicated these predicted economic behaviors for a majority of participants. In the lab, participants showed susceptibility to sunk costs in this task, basing their decisions in part on time they have already waited, which we also observed in the subset of the mTurk sample that behaved economically. In another version of the task, we added an attention check to the wait phase of the delay. While that attention check further increased the proportion of subjects with predicted economic behaviors, it also removed the susceptibility to sunk costs. These findings have important implications for understanding how cognitive processes, such as the deployment of attention, are key to driving re-evaluation and susceptibility to sunk costs.
Copyright © 2021 Kazinka, MacDonald and Redish.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; cognition; effort; foraging; mTurk; multiple decision systems; sunk costs

Year:  2021        PMID: 33692720      PMCID: PMC7937795          DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.604843

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Psychol        ISSN: 1664-1078


  19 in total

1.  "Work ethic" in pigeons: reward value is directly related to the effort or time required to obtain the reward.

Authors:  T S Clement; J R Feltus; D H Kaiser; T R Zentall
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

2.  Understanding behavior in escalation situations.

Authors:  B M Staw; J Ross
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another.

Authors:  Kristina F Pattison; Thomas R Zentall; Shigeru Watanabe
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Subjective costs drive overly patient foraging strategies in rats on an intertemporal foraging task.

Authors:  Andrew M Wikenheiser; David W Stephens; A David Redish
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Neural signatures underlying deliberation in human foraging decisions.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; Michael Hanke; A David Redish; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Preference for the Outcome That Follows a Relatively Aversive Event: Contrast or Delay Reduction?

Authors:  Rebecca A Singer; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2011-08-01

7.  Altering gain of the infralimbic-to-accumbens shell circuit alters economically dissociable decision-making algorithms.

Authors:  Brian M Sweis; Erin B Larson; A David Redish; Mark J Thomas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of regret in rat decision-making on a neuroeconomic task.

Authors:  Adam P Steiner; A David Redish
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-08       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Learning From Loss After Risk: Dissociating Reward Pursuit and Reward Valuation in a Naturalistic Foraging Task.

Authors:  Samantha V Abram; A David Redish; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 4.157

10.  Sensitivity to "sunk costs" in mice, rats, and humans.

Authors:  Brian M Sweis; Samantha V Abram; Brandy J Schmidt; Kelsey D Seeland; Angus W MacDonald; Mark J Thomas; A David Redish
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  2 in total

1.  Computational validity: using computation to translate behaviours across species.

Authors:  A David Redish; Adam Kepecs; Lisa M Anderson; Olivia L Calvin; Nicola M Grissom; Ann F Haynos; Sarah R Heilbronner; Alexander B Herman; Suma Jacob; Sisi Ma; Iris Vilares; Sophia Vinogradov; Cody J Walters; Alik S Widge; Jennifer L Zick; Anna Zilverstand
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-12-27       Impact factor: 6.671

2.  Apparent sunk cost effect in rational agents.

Authors:  Torben Ott; Paul Masset; Thiago S Gouvêa; Adam Kepecs
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.136

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.