Literature DB >> 21574688

Sunk cost: pigeons (Columba livia), too, show bias to complete a task rather than shift to another.

Kristina F Pattison1, Thomas R Zentall, Shigeru Watanabe.   

Abstract

The sunk cost effect involves the bias to stay with an alternative because one has already invested resources, even when there is a better alternative available. In a series of experiments, at various points during a 30-peck requirement, pigeons (Columba livia) could choose between completing the response requirement (at a different location in Experiment 1 or the same location in Experiments 3 and 4) and switching to a constant number of pecks. In three experiments, the pigeons showed a bias to complete the pecks already started, even when that required more pecking. We also demonstrated that the bias depended on the initial investment and was not produced merely because the pigeons preferred a variable alternative over a fixed alternative. The deviation from optimal choice suggests that pigeons show a bias similar to the sunk cost effect in humans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21574688     DOI: 10.1037/a0023826

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Psychol        ISSN: 0021-9940            Impact factor:   2.231


  8 in total

1.  Varying the costs of sunk costs: optimal and non-optimal choices in a sunk-cost task with humans.

Authors:  Raul Avila; Rachelle L Yankelevitz; Juan C Gonzalez; Timothy D Hackenberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The Monty Hall dilemma with pigeons: No, you choose for me.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Jacob P Case; Tiffany L Collins
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.986

3.  Experience that Much Work Produces Many Reinforcers Makes the Sunk Cost Fallacy in Pigeons: A Preliminary Test.

Authors:  Shun Fujimaki; Takayuki Sakagami
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-16

4.  Capuchin and rhesus monkeys show sunk cost effects in a psychomotor task.

Authors:  Julia Watzek; Sarah F Brosnan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Learned valuation during forage decision-making in cuttlefish.

Authors:  Tzu-Hsin Kuo; Chuan-Chin Chiao
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 2.963

Review 6.  Revisited: Pigeons Have Much Cognitive Behavior in Common With Humans.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-21

7.  Sensitivity to Sunk Costs Depends on Attention to the Delay.

Authors:  Rebecca Kazinka; Angus W MacDonald; A David Redish
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-02-22

8.  Certainty and uncertainty of the future changes planning and sunk costs.

Authors:  Anneke A Duin; London Aman; Brandy Schmidt; A David Redish
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 2.154

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.