Literature DB >> 33684217

Effect of Acid or Base Interventions on Bone Health: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

Yibing Han1, Min An1, Li Yang1, Liuran Li1, Shitao Rao2,3, Yanzhen Cheng1.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a global health issue among the aging population. The effect of the acid or base interventions on bone health remains controversial. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate effects of acidic diets and alkaline supplements on bone health simultaneously. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in 5 available databases and 1 registered clinical trial system to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed effects of the acid-base intervention on bone health. Depending on heterogeneity across studies, the pooled effects were calculated by fixed-effects or random-effects models. The present study included 13 acidic diet intervention studies and 13 alkaline supplement studies for final quantitative assessments. The meta-analysis showed that acidic diets significantly increased net acid excretion [NAE; standardized mean difference (SMD) = 2.99; P = 0.003] and urinary calcium excretion (SMD = 0.47, P < 0.00001) but had no significant effect on bone turnover markers and bone mineral density (BMD). On the other hand, alkaline supplement intervention significantly reduced NAE (SMD = -1.29, P < 0.00001), urinary calcium excretion (SMD = -0.44, P = 0.007), bone resorption marker aminoterminal cross-linking telopeptide (NTX; SMD = -0.29, P = 0.003), and bone formation marker osteocalcin (OC; SMD = -0.23, P = 0.02), but did not affect the other bone turnover markers. Furthermore, alkaline supplements significantly increased BMD in femoral neck [mean difference (MD) = 1.62, P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%], lumbar spine (MD = 1.66, P < 0.00001, I2 = 87%), and total hip (MD = 0.98, P = 0.02, I2 = 99%). Subsequently, meta-regression analyses identified 1 study that substantially contributed to the high heterogeneity of BMD in the latter 2 sites, but sensitivity analysis suggested that this study did not affect the significant pooled effects. Despite that, the results should be interpreted with caution and need to be further validated by a larger RCT. In summary, through integrating evidence from RCTs, the present meta-analysis initially suggests that alkaline supplements may be beneficial to bone metabolism and acidic diets may not be harmful to bone health. This work may be clinically useful for both clinicians and patients with osteoporosis.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  acidic diets; alkaline supplements; bone health; bone mineral density; bone turnover markers

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33684217      PMCID: PMC8321841          DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmab002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Nutr        ISSN: 2161-8313            Impact factor:   8.701


  48 in total

1.  Changes in bone turnover in young women consuming different levels of dietary protein.

Authors:  J E Kerstetter; M E Mitnick; C M Gundberg; D M Caseria; A F Ellison; T O Carpenter; K L Insogna
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 2.  Acid diet (high-meat protein) effects on calcium metabolism and bone health.

Authors:  Jay J Cao; Forrest H Nielsen
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Diet acids and alkalis influence calcium retention in bone.

Authors:  T Buclin; M Cosma; M Appenzeller; A F Jacquet; L A Décosterd; J Biollaz; P Burckhardt
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Dietary protein and calcium interact to influence calcium retention: a controlled feeding study.

Authors:  Janet R Hunt; Luann K Johnson; Z K Fariba Roughead
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  Effect of a hypocaloric, nutritionally complete, higher-protein meal plan on bone density and quality in older adults with obesity: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Ashley A Weaver; Denise K Houston; Sue A Shapses; Mary F Lyles; Rebecca M Henderson; Daniel P Beavers; Arlynn C Baker; Kristen M Beavers
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 7.045

6.  Controlled high meat diets do not affect calcium retention or indices of bone status in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Zamzam K Roughead; LuAnn K Johnson; Glenn I Lykken; Janet R Hunt
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.798

7.  Dietary protein and bone health across the life-course: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis over 40 years.

Authors:  A L Darling; R J F Manders; S Sahni; K Zhu; C E Hewitt; R L Prince; D J Millward; S A Lanham-New
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Dietary protein, calcium metabolism, and skeletal homeostasis revisited.

Authors:  Jane E Kerstetter; Kimberly O O'Brien; Karl L Insogna
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 7.045

9.  POTASSIUM CITRATE DECREASES BONE RESORPTION IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH OSTEOPENIA: A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND CLINICAL TRIAL.

Authors:  Naina Sinha Gregory; Rekha Kumar; Emily M Stein; Ellen Alexander; Paul Christos; Richard S Bockman; John S Rodman
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.443

10.  The impact of dietary protein on calcium absorption and kinetic measures of bone turnover in women.

Authors:  Jane E Kerstetter; Kimberly O O'Brien; Donna M Caseria; Diane E Wall; Karl L Insogna
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 5.958

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dietary Acid Load and Bone Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies.

Authors:  Fatemeh Gholami; Sina Naghshi; Mahsa Samadi; Niloufar Rasaei; Khadijeh Mirzaei
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 2.  Microgravity-Related Changes in Bone Density and Treatment Options: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ronni Baran; Markus Wehland; Herbert Schulz; Martina Heer; Manfred Infanger; Daniela Grimm
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 6.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.