Janet R Hunt1, Luann K Johnson, Z K Fariba Roughead. 1. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center, Grand Forks, ND, USA. janetrhunt@gmail.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The effect of meat protein on calcium retention at different calcium intakes is unresolved. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to test the effect of dietary protein on calcium retention at low and high intakes of calcium. DESIGN: In a randomized controlled feeding study with a 2 x 2 factorial crossover design, healthy postmenopausal women (n = 27) consumed either approximately 675 or approximately 1510 mg Ca/d, with both low and high protein (providing 10% and 20% energy) for 7 wk each, separated by a 3-wk washout period. After 3 wk, the entire diet was extrinsically labeled with (47)Ca, and isotope retention was monitored by whole-body scintillation counting. Clinical markers of calcium and bone metabolism were measured. RESULTS: High compared with low dietary protein significantly increased calcium retention from the low-calcium (29.5% compared with 26.0% absorbed) but not the high-calcium diet (18% absorbed). For the low-calcium diet, this effect nearly balanced a protein-related 0.5-mmol/d greater urinary calcium excretion. Protein-related calciuretic effects were independent of dietary calcium. Testing at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 wk showed no long-term adaptation in urinary acidity or urinary calcium excretion. High compared with low dietary protein decreased urinary deoxypyridinoline and increased serum insulin-like growth factor I without affecting parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, or tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy postmenopausal women, a moderate increase in dietary protein, from 10% to 20% of energy, slightly improved calcium absorption from a low-calcium diet, nearly compensating for a slight increase in urinary calcium excretion. Under practical dietary conditions, increased dietary protein from animal sources was not detrimental to calcium balance or short-term indicators of bone health.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The effect of meat protein on calcium retention at different calcium intakes is unresolved. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to test the effect of dietary protein on calcium retention at low and high intakes of calcium. DESIGN: In a randomized controlled feeding study with a 2 x 2 factorial crossover design, healthy postmenopausal women (n = 27) consumed either approximately 675 or approximately 1510 mg Ca/d, with both low and high protein (providing 10% and 20% energy) for 7 wk each, separated by a 3-wk washout period. After 3 wk, the entire diet was extrinsically labeled with (47)Ca, and isotope retention was monitored by whole-body scintillation counting. Clinical markers of calcium and bone metabolism were measured. RESULTS: High compared with low dietary protein significantly increased calcium retention from the low-calcium (29.5% compared with 26.0% absorbed) but not the high-calcium diet (18% absorbed). For the low-calcium diet, this effect nearly balanced a protein-related 0.5-mmol/d greater urinary calcium excretion. Protein-related calciuretic effects were independent of dietary calcium. Testing at 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 wk showed no long-term adaptation in urinary acidity or urinary calcium excretion. High compared with low dietary protein decreased urinary deoxypyridinoline and increased serum insulin-like growth factor I without affecting parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, or tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy postmenopausal women, a moderate increase in dietary protein, from 10% to 20% of energy, slightly improved calcium absorption from a low-calcium diet, nearly compensating for a slight increase in urinary calcium excretion. Under practical dietary conditions, increased dietary protein from animal sources was not detrimental to calcium balance or short-term indicators of bone health.
Authors: Jane E Kerstetter; Jessica D Bihuniak; Jennifer Brindisi; Rebecca R Sullivan; Kelsey M Mangano; Sarah Larocque; Belinda M Kotler; Christine A Simpson; Anna Maria Cusano; Erin Gaffney-Stomberg; Alison Kleppinger; Jesse Reynolds; James Dziura; Anne M Kenny; Karl L Insogna Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2015-04-06 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Kelsey M Mangano; Shivani Sahni; Douglas P Kiel; Katherine L Tucker; Alyssa B Dufour; Marian T Hannan Journal: J Acad Nutr Diet Date: 2015-05-30 Impact factor: 4.910
Authors: Deeptha Sukumar; Hasina Ambia-Sobhan; Robert Zurfluh; Yvette Schlussel; Theodore J Stahl; Chris L Gordon; Sue A Shapses Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Jeannette M Beasley; Laura E Ichikawa; Brett A Ange; Leslie Spangler; Andrea Z LaCroix; Susan M Ott; Delia Scholes Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-03-10 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Sara R Zwart; Barbara L Rice; Holly Dlouhy; Linda C Shackelford; Martina Heer; Matthew D Koslovsky; Scott M Smith Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Jessica D Bihuniak; Rebecca R Sullivan; Christine A Simpson; Donna M Caseria; Tania B Huedo-Medina; Kimberly O O'Brien; Jane E Kerstetter; Karl L Insogna Journal: J Nutr Date: 2014-01-15 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Lisa Langsetmo; James M Shikany; Peggy M Cawthon; Jane A Cauley; Brent C Taylor; Tien N Vo; Douglas C Bauer; Eric S Orwoll; John T Schousboe; Kristine E Ensrud Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2017-02-13 Impact factor: 6.741