Literature DB >> 33683465

Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.

Hüseyin Hatirli1, Bilal Yasa2, Esra Uzer Çelik2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this clinical trial was to evaluate the 2-year clinical performances of high-viscosity glass ionomer and nanohybrid resin composite restorations performed without rubber dam isolation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusal carious lesions on the right and left mandibular second molars of 56 patients (26 female, 30 male patients) were restored in a split-mouth design. High-viscosity glass ionomer (Hv-GIC) (Equia, GC) and nanohybrid resin composite (GrandioSO, Voco) were used as restorative materials. Clinical evaluations of the restorations were performed according to the Fédération Dentaire Internationale criteria. Data were analysed using the Friedman's analysis of variance and Mann-Whitney U tests (α=0.05).
RESULTS: After 2 years, the success rate of Hv-GIC restorations was 96% and that of resin composite restorations was 100%. Hv-GIC showed lower marginal discoloration and greater surface wear and loss of anatomic form (p<0.05). Resin composite showed significantly better surface lustre.
CONCLUSION: The 2-year performance of resin composite was similar to that of Hv-GIC for the occlusal restorations of mandibular second molars, in spite of being performed without rubber-dam isolation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Saliva contamination can be a clinically significant problem for dental restorations. High-viscosity glass ionomers are a satisfactory alternative to resin composites with the advantage of fast application in such situations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registration number-date: NCT04488380-22/07/2020, retrospectively registered.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  High-viscosity glass ionomer; Nanohybrid composite; Occlusal restoration; Restorative glass ionomer; Rubber dam; Split-mouth

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683465     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-03857-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  3 in total

Review 1.  Adverse effects of salivary contamination for adhesives in restorative dentistry. A literature review.

Authors:  Pooja Nair; Reinhard Hickel; Nicoleta Ilie
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.522

Review 2.  Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

Authors:  Flávio Fernando Demarco; Kauê Collares; Marcos Britto Correa; Maximiliano Sergio Cenci; Rafael Ratto de Moraes; Niek Johannes Opdam
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2017-08-28

3.  Influence of blood contamination during multimode adhesive application on the microtensile bond strength to dentin.

Authors:  E Kucukyilmaz; E U Celik; M Akcay; B Yasa
Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 0.968

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.