Literature DB >> 28902236

Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing?

Flávio Fernando Demarco1, Kauê Collares1, Marcos Britto Correa1, Maximiliano Sergio Cenci1, Rafael Ratto de Moraes1, Niek Johannes Opdam2.   

Abstract

Composites resins have become the first choice for direct anterior and posterior restorations. The great popularity is related to their esthetic appearance and reduced need of sound tissue removal as compared with former treatments. Several studies have demonstrated that composite restorations may last long in clinical service. In this review we discuss the factors playing a role on the long-term longevity. Composite restorations have demonstrated a good clinical performance with annual failure rates varying from 1% to 3% in posterior teeth and 1% to 5% in anterior teeth. Factors related to the patients such as caries risk and occlusal stress risk, in addition to socioeconomic factors, may affect the survival significantly. Characteristics of the clinical operators, particularly their decision making when it comes to observing or approaching an existing restoration, are decisive for longevity. Cavity features such as the number of restored walls, composite volume, and presence of endodontic treatment are of major importance and may dictate the service time of the restorative approach. The choice of restorative composite seems to have a minor effect on longevity provided that appropriate technical procedures are used. The main reasons for failure in posterior teeth are secondary caries and fracture (restoration or tooth/restoration), while in anterior teeth esthetic concerns are the main reasons leading to restoration failures. Composite resin restorations can be considered a reliable treatment as long as both the professional and the patient are aware of the factors involved in restoration failures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28902236     DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz Oral Res        ISSN: 1806-8324


  26 in total

1.  At the Interface of Materials and Microbiology: A Call for the Development of Standardized Approaches to Assay Biomaterial-Biofilm Interactions.

Authors:  J Kreth; J L Ferracane; C S Pfeifer; S Khajotia; J Merritt
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 6.116

2.  Clinical performance of high-viscosity glass ionomer and resin composite on minimally invasive occlusal restorations performed without rubber-dam isolation: a two-year randomised split-mouth study.

Authors:  Hüseyin Hatirli; Bilal Yasa; Esra Uzer Çelik
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  In vitro performance of 2-step, total etch adhesives modified by thiourethane additives.

Authors:  J Puppin-Rontani; A P P Fugolin; A R Costa; L Correr-Sobrinho; C S Pfeifer
Journal:  Int J Adhes Adhes       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 3.189

Review 4.  Use of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in class II restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cleber Paradzinski Cavalheiro; Helena Scherer; José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato; Fabrício Mezzomo Collares; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.606

5.  The outcome of direct composite restorations using the dental operating microscope.

Authors:  Marius Bud; Mircea Zlăvog; Ştefan Jitaru; Bora Korkut; Sergiu Spataru; Ada Delean
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-10-30

6.  Non-silicate nanoparticles for improved nanohybrid resin composites.

Authors:  Leina Nakanishi; Marina R Kaizer; Suzane Brandeburski; Sergio S Cava; Alvaro Della Bona; Yu Zhang; Rafael R Moraes
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.304

7.  Toughening of Dental Composites with Thiourethane-Modified Filler Interfaces.

Authors:  Ana P Fugolin; Daniel Sundfeld; Jack L Ferracane; Carmem S Pfeifer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Resin based restorative dental materials: characteristics and future perspectives.

Authors:  Bhanu Pratap; Ravi Kant Gupta; Bhuvnesh Bhardwaj; Meetu Nag
Journal:  Jpn Dent Sci Rev       Date:  2019-10-21

9.  The effect of two clinical criteria in the assessment of caries lesions around restorations in children (CARDEC-03): study protocol for a diagnostic randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Bruna Lorena Pereira Moro; Cácia Signori; Raiza Dias Freitas; Laura Regina Antunes Pontes; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi; Tamara Kerber Tedesco; Daniela Prócida Raggio; Mariana Minatel Braga; Kim Rud Ekstrand; Maximiliano Sérgio Cenci; Fausto Medeiros Mendes
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-06-26

10.  Knowledge and Attitude of Dental Clinicians towards Light-Curing Units: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Dana Al-Senan; Fatin Ageel; Amani Aldosari; Haifa Maktabi
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.