Literature DB >> 33683149

Expanding the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score for Predicting Diabetes Incidence in People Living with HIV.

Karla I Galaviz1, Michael F Schneider2, Phyllis C Tien3, Keri N Althoff2, Mohammed K Ali4, Igho Ofotokun5, Todd T Brown2,6.   

Abstract

This study investigated whether the predictive ability of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) can be improved among people with HIV by adding a marker of insulin resistance. In this longitudinal analysis of the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study and the Women's Interagency HIV Study, HIV-positive and HIV-negative participants without prevalent diabetes were included. FINDRISC score and the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) were calculated at baseline. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine associations between baseline risk scores and time to incident diabetes (first self-report of diabetes medication use). Model discrimination (Uno's c-statistic) and calibration (observed vs. cumulative probability of diabetes) were assessed for FINDRISC, HOMA-IR, and combined FINDRISC and HOMA-IR. Overall, 2,527 men (1,299 HIV-positive and 1,228 HIV-negative, median age = 44) and 2,446 women (1,841 HIV-positive and 605 HIV-negative, median age = 41) were included. Over 47,040 person-years of follow-up, diabetes incidence rates per 1,000 person-years were 9.5 in HIV-positive men, 7.1 in HIV-negative men, 14.5 in HIV-positive women, and 15.1 in HIV-negative women. FINDRISC discrimination (HIV-positive men c = 0.64 [0.55, 0.74], HIV-negative men c = 0.74 [0.68, 0.79], HIV-positive women c = 0.68 [0.64, 0.71], and HIV-negative women c = 0.73 [0.66, 0.79]) was significantly better than that of HOMA-IR. FINDRISC was better calibrated than HOMA-IR in each of the four groups. Adding HOMA-IR did not improve FINDRISC discrimination/calibration. Diabetes risk prediction with FINDRISC was suboptimal in men and women with HIV, and its performance was not improved with addition of HOMA-IR. The optimal method for identifying people living with HIV at-risk for diabetes is yet to be identified.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HIV; dysglycemia; insulin resistance; risk prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683149      PMCID: PMC8112710          DOI: 10.1089/AID.2020.0247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses        ISSN: 0889-2229            Impact factor:   2.205


  30 in total

1.  Use of alternative thresholds defining insulin resistance to predict incident type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Martin K Rutter; Peter W F Wilson; Lisa M Sullivan; Caroline S Fox; Ralph B D'Agostino; James B Meigs
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data.

Authors:  Hajime Uno; Tianxi Cai; Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; L J Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  The multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1983 to ….

Authors:  R Detels; L Jacobson; J Margolick; O Martinez-Maza; A Muñoz; J Phair; C Rinaldo; S Wolinsky
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.427

4.  Evaluation of the modified FINDRISC to identify individuals at high risk for diabetes among middle-aged white and black ARIC study participants.

Authors:  Manjusha Kulkarni; Randi E Foraker; Ann M McNeill; Cynthia Girman; Sherita H Golden; Wayne D Rosamond; Bruce Duncan; Maria Ines Schmidt; Jaakko Tuomilehto
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 6.577

5.  Predicting diabetes risk among HIV-positive and HIV-negative women.

Authors:  Karla I Galaviz; Michael F Schneider; Phyllis C Tien; C Christina Mehta; Ighovwerha Ofotokun; Jonathan Colasanti; Vincent C Marconi; Kartika Palar; Gina Wingood; Adaora A Adimora; Maria Alcaide; Mardge H Cohen; Deborah Gustafson; Roksana Karim; Deborah Konkle-Parker; Daniel Merenstein; Anjali Sharma; Mohammed K Ali
Journal:  AIDS       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 4.177

6.  Antiretroviral therapy exposure and insulin resistance in the Women's Interagency HIV study.

Authors:  Phyllis C Tien; Michael F E Schneider; Stephen R Cole; Alexandra M Levine; Mardge Cohen; Jack DeHovitz; Mary Young; Jessica E Justman
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  Cohort Profile: The Women's Interagency HIV Study (WIHS).

Authors:  Adaora A Adimora; Catalina Ramirez; Lorie Benning; Ruth M Greenblatt; Mirjam-Colette Kempf; Phyllis C Tien; Seble G Kassaye; Kathryn Anastos; Mardge Cohen; Howard Minkoff; Gina Wingood; Igho Ofotokun; Margaret A Fischl; Stephen Gange
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.196

8.  Insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant obese and non-obese phenotypes: role in prediction of incident pre-diabetes in a longitudinal biracial cohort.

Authors:  Ibiye Owei; Nkiru Umekwe; Casey Provo; Jim Wan; Samuel Dagogo-Jack
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2017-07-19

Review 9.  Differentiation of Diabetes by Pathophysiology, Natural History, and Prognosis.

Authors:  Jay S Skyler; George L Bakris; Ezio Bonifacio; Tamara Darsow; Robert H Eckel; Leif Groop; Per-Henrik Groop; Yehuda Handelsman; Richard A Insel; Chantal Mathieu; Allison T McElvaine; Jerry P Palmer; Alberto Pugliese; Desmond A Schatz; Jay M Sosenko; John P H Wilding; Robert E Ratner
Journal:  Diabetes       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 9.461

10.  2019 update of the European AIDS Clinical Society Guidelines for treatment of people living with HIV version 10.0.

Authors:  L Ryom; A Cotter; R De Miguel; C Béguelin; D Podlekareva; J R Arribas; C Marzolini; Pgm Mallon; A Rauch; O Kirk; J M Molina; G Guaraldi; A Winston; S Bhagani; P Cinque; J D Kowalska; S Collins; M Battegay
Journal:  HIV Med       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 3.180

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.