Literature DB >> 33683004

Does the beta regularization parameter of bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction always affect the quantification accuracy and image quality of positron emission tomography computed tomography?

Zhifang Wu1,2, Binwei Guo1, Bin Huang1, Bin Zhao1, Zhixing Qin1, Xinzhong Hao1, Meng Liang1, Jun Xie3, Sijin Li1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to provide a detailed investigation on the noise penalization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood (BPL)-based algorithm, with the utilization of partial volume effect correction (PVC), so as to offer the suitable beta value and optimum standardized uptake value (SUV) parameters in clinical practice for small pulmonary nodules.
METHODS: A National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image-quality phantom was scanned and images were reconstructed using BPL with beta values ranged from 100 to 1000. The recovery coefficient (RC), contrast recovery (CR), and background variability (BV) were measured to assess the quantification accuracy and image quality. In the clinical assessment, lesions were categorized into sub-centimeter (<10 mm, n = 7) group and medium size (10-30 mm, n = 16) group. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured to evaluate the image quality and lesion detectability. With PVC was performed, the impact of beta values on SUVs (SUVmax, SUVmean, SUVpeak) of small pulmonary nodules was evaluated. Subjective image analysis was performed by two experienced readers.
RESULTS: With the increasing of beta values, RC, CR, and BV decreased gradually in the phantom work. In the clinical study, SNR and CNR of both groups increased with the beta values (P < 0.001), although the sub-centimeter group showed increases after the beta value reached over 700. In addition, highly significant negative correlations were observed between SUVs and beta values for both lesion-size groups before the PVC (P < 0.001 for all). After the PVC, SUVpeak measured from the sub-centimeter group was no significantly different among different beta values (P = 0.830).
CONCLUSION: Our study suggests using SUVpeak as the quantification parameter with PVC performed to mitigate the effects of beta regularization. Beta values between 300 and 400 were preferred for pulmonary nodules smaller than 30 mm.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian penalized likelihood; PET/CT; small pulmonary nodules

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33683004      PMCID: PMC7984479          DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys        ISSN: 1526-9914            Impact factor:   2.102


  38 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.

Authors:  Michael C Adams; Timothy G Turkington; Joshua M Wilson; Terence Z Wong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.959

2.  A recovery coefficient method for partial volume correction of PET images.

Authors:  Shyam M Srinivas; Thiruvenkatasamy Dhurairaj; Sandip Basu; Gonca Bural; Suleman Surti; Abass Alavi
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.668

Review 3.  Importance of quantification for the analysis of PET data in oncology: review of current methods and trends for the future.

Authors:  Giampaolo Tomasi; Federico Turkheimer; Eric Aboagye
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.488

4.  NEMA NU 2-2012 performance studies for the SiPM-based ToF-PET component of the GE SIGNA PET/MR system.

Authors:  Alexander M Grant; Timothy W Deller; Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Sri Harsha Maramraju; Gaspar Delso; Craig S Levin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for 18F-FDG Whole-Body Examinations.

Authors:  Elin Lindström; Anders Sundin; Carlos Trampal; Lars Lindsjö; Ezgi Ilan; Torsten Danfors; Gunnar Antoni; Jens Sörensen; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 10.057

6.  Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases?

Authors:  Nassim Parvizi; James M Franklin; Daniel R McGowan; Eugene J Teoh; Kevin M Bradley; Fergus V Gleeson
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  A new method for volume segmentation of PET images, based on possibility theory.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Dewalle-Vignion; Nacim Betrouni; Renaud Lopes; Damien Huglo; Simon Stute; Maximilien Vermandel
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-10-14       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Compensation for spill-in and spill-out partial volume effects in cardiac PET imaging.

Authors:  Yong Du; Igal Madar; Martin J Stumpf; Xing Rong; George S K Fung; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  Tumor quantification in clinical positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Bing Bai; James Bading; Peter S Conti
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Invalidity of SUV Measurements of Lesions in Close Proximity to Hot Sources due to "Shine-Through" Effect on FDG PET-CT Interpretation.

Authors:  Yiyan Liu
Journal:  Radiol Res Pract       Date:  2012-10-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.

Authors:  Defeng Tian; Hongwei Yang; Yan Li; Bixiao Cui; Jie Lu
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2022-01-10
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.