BACKGROUND: Procedural experience for residents and fellows is critical for achieving competence, and documentation of procedures performed is required. Procedure logs serve as the record of this experience, but are commonly generated manually, require substantial administrative effort, and cannot be corroborated for accuracy. OBJECTIVE: We developed and implemented a structured clinical-educational report template (CERT), which automatically generates procedure logs directly from the clinical record. METHODS: Our CERT aimed to replace the post-procedure note template for our cardiac catheterization laboratory and was incorporated into the electronic health record system. Numbers of documented procedures in automated CERT-derived procedure logs over a 1-year post-intervention period (2018-2019) were compared to manual logs and corrected for clinical volume changes. The CERT's impact on fellowship experience was also assessed. RESULTS: Automated CERT procedure logs increased weekly procedural documentation over manual procedure logs for total procedures (24.2 ± 6.1 vs 17.1 ± 6.8, P = .007), left heart catheterizations (14.5 ± 3.6 vs 10.8 ± 4.2, P = .039), total procedural elements (40.2 ± 11.4 versus 20.9 ± 12.5, P < .001), and captured procedural details not previously documented. The CERT also reduced self-reported administrative time and improved fellowship experience. CONCLUSIONS: A novel CERT allows procedure logs to be automatically derived from the clinical record and increased the number of documented procedures, compared to manual logging. This innovation ensures an accurate record of procedural experience and reduces self-reported non-educational administrative time for cardiology fellows.
BACKGROUND: Procedural experience for residents and fellows is critical for achieving competence, and documentation of procedures performed is required. Procedure logs serve as the record of this experience, but are commonly generated manually, require substantial administrative effort, and cannot be corroborated for accuracy. OBJECTIVE: We developed and implemented a structured clinical-educational report template (CERT), which automatically generates procedure logs directly from the clinical record. METHODS: Our CERT aimed to replace the post-procedure note template for our cardiac catheterization laboratory and was incorporated into the electronic health record system. Numbers of documented procedures in automated CERT-derived procedure logs over a 1-year post-intervention period (2018-2019) were compared to manual logs and corrected for clinical volume changes. The CERT's impact on fellowship experience was also assessed. RESULTS: Automated CERT procedure logs increased weekly procedural documentation over manual procedure logs for total procedures (24.2 ± 6.1 vs 17.1 ± 6.8, P = .007), left heart catheterizations (14.5 ± 3.6 vs 10.8 ± 4.2, P = .039), total procedural elements (40.2 ± 11.4 versus 20.9 ± 12.5, P < .001), and captured procedural details not previously documented. The CERT also reduced self-reported administrative time and improved fellowship experience. CONCLUSIONS: A novel CERT allows procedure logs to be automatically derived from the clinical record and increased the number of documented procedures, compared to manual logging. This innovation ensures an accurate record of procedural experience and reduces self-reported non-educational administrative time for cardiology fellows.
Authors: Thomas S Seufert; Patricia M Mitchell; Allison R Wilcox; Julia E Rubin-Smith; Laura F White; Kerry K McCabe; Jeffrey I Schneider Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-10 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Allan Simpao; James W Heitz; Stephen E McNulty; Beth Chekemian; B Randall Brenn; Richard H Epstein Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2010-12-14 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: Rebekah L Gardner; Emily Cooper; Jacqueline Haskell; Daniel A Harris; Sara Poplau; Philip J Kroth; Mark Linzer Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2019-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Timothy A Sanborn; James E Tcheng; H Vernon Anderson; Charles E Chambers; Sharon L Cheatham; Matthew V DeCaro; Jeremy C Durack; Allen D Everett; John B Gordon; William E Hammond; Ziyad M Hijazi; Vikram S Kashyap; Merrill Knudtson; Michael J Landzberg; Marco A Martinez-Rios; Lisa A Riggs; Kui Hian Sim; David J Slotwiner; Harry Solomon; Wilson Y Szeto; Bonnie H Weiner; William S Weintraub; John R Windle Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nimesh D Naik; Eduardo F Abbott; Johnathon M Aho; T K Pandian; Cornelius A Thiels; Stephanie F Heller; David R Farley Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2017-10-18 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: P D McGrath; D E Wennberg; J D Dickens; A E Siewers; F L Lucas; D J Malenka; M A Kellett; T J Ryan Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-12-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sanjit S Jolly; John Cairns; Salim Yusuf; Kari Niemela; Philippe Gabriel Steg; Matthew Worthley; Emile Ferrari; Warren J Cantor; Anthony Fung; Nicholas Valettas; Michael Rokoss; Goran K Olivecrona; Petr Widimsky; Asim N Cheema; Peggy Gao; Shamir R Mehta Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-11-21 Impact factor: 24.094