Literature DB >> 29055744

The ACGME Case Log System May Not Accurately Represent Operative Experience Among General Surgery Interns.

Nimesh D Naik1, Eduardo F Abbott2, Johnathon M Aho1, T K Pandian1, Cornelius A Thiels1, Stephanie F Heller1, David R Farley3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess if the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system accurately captures operative experience of our postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) residents.
DESIGN: ACGME case log information was retrospectively obtained for 5 cohorts of PGY-1 residents (2011-2015) and compared to the number of operative cases captured by an institutional automated operative case report system, Surgical Access Utility System (SAUS). SAUS automatically captures all surgical team members who are listed in the operative dictation for a given case, including interns. A paired t-test analysis was used to compare number of cases coded between the 2 systems.
SETTING: Academic, tertiary care referral center with a large general surgery training program. PARTICIPANTS: PGY-1 general surgery trainees (interns) from the years 2011-2015.
RESULTS: Forty-nine PGY-1 general surgery residents were identified over a 5-year period. Mean operative case volume per intern, per year, captured by the automated SAUS was 176.5 ± 28.1 (SD) compared to 126.3 ± 58.0 ACGME cases logged (mean difference = 50.2 cases, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: ACGME case log data may not accurately reflect the actual operative experience of our PGY-1 residents. If such data holds true for other general surgery training programs, the true impact of duty hour regulations on operative volume may be unclear when using the ACGME case log data. This current standard approach for using ACGME case logs as a representation of operative experience requires further scrutiny and potential revision to more accurately determine operative experience for accreditation purposes.
Copyright © 2017 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACGME; Patient Care, Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Systems-Based Practice; operative experience; operative volume; training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29055744     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  6 in total

1.  Implementation and Evaluation of Integrating an Electronic Health Record With the ACGME Case Log System.

Authors:  Grace Xiao; Shameema Sikder; Fasika Woreta; Michael V Boland
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2022-08

2.  To the Editor: Incorporating New Technologies Into Graduate Medical Education Practices.

Authors:  Michael Essandoh; Nasir Hussain; Scott Holliday
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-08-13

3.  Resident Endoscopy Experience Correlates Poorly with Performance on a Virtual Reality Simulator.

Authors:  Kurun Partap S Oberoi; Michael T Scott; Jacob Schwartzman; Jasmine Mahajan; Nell Maloney Patel; Melissa M Alvarez-Downing; Aziz M Merchant; Anastasia Kunac
Journal:  Surg J (N Y)       Date:  2022-03-03

4.  Automated Procedure Logs for Cardiology Fellows: A New Training Paradigm in the Era of Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Emeka C Anyanwu; Victor Mor-Avi; R Parker Ward
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2021-01-08

5.  ACGME Case Volume Minimums Decrease the Number of Shoulder and Knee Arthroscopies Performed by Residents.

Authors:  Sean C Clark; Cadence Miskimin; Mary K Mulcahey
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-05

6.  Improving ACGME Compliance for Obstetric Anesthesiology Fellows Using an Automated Email Notification System.

Authors:  Holly B Ende; Michael G Richardson; Brandon M Lopez; Jonathan P Wanderer
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.762

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.