Literature DB >> 33679951

Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.

Rashida Parveen1, Mehnaz Khakwani2, Anum Naz3, Rabia Bhatti4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze trends of CSs and evaluating them according to Robson's Ten Groups Classification System (TGCS) at a leading government tertiary care hospital of South Punjab, Pakistan.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nishtar Medical University Hospital, Multan Pakistan, from October 2019 to March 2020.The study population included a total of 167 women who underwent CS in the hospital during the specified study period. For each case, we collected data regarding maternal characteristics and pregnancy-related information. The dependent variable was Robson classification group.
RESULTS: Overall, mean age was 26.53+5.1 years. Majority of the women, 116 (69.5%) belonged to urban areas of residence, 74 (44.3%) gestational aged between 37-42 years while 108 (64.7%) had history of cesarean section. Most of the patients, 85 (50.9%) turned out to be from TGCS Group-10. Group-5 and Group-1 were the 2nd and 3rd most common group, accounted for 24 (14.4%) and 19 (11.4%) cases respectively. Previous cesarean section (20.4%) and fetal distress (19.8%) were found to be most common indications leading to cesarean section.
CONCLUSION: As per Robson's Ten-Group Classification, Group-10 and Group-5 were found to be the most contributing among deliveries done. Previous cesarean section and fetal distress were the most common indications of cesarean section. Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Fetal distress; Robson’s Ten-Group Classification

Year:  2021        PMID: 33679951      PMCID: PMC7931279          DOI: 10.12669/pjms.37.2.3823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pak J Med Sci        ISSN: 1681-715X            Impact factor:   1.088


  16 in total

1.  Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway.

Authors:  Toril Kolås; Dag Hofoss; Anne K Daltveit; Stein T Nilsen; Tore Henriksen; Renate Häger; Ingemar Ingemarsson; Pål Øian
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  WHO Statement on caesarean section rates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Reprod Health Matters       Date:  2015-07-27

Review 3.  Cesarean birth in the United States: epidemiology, trends, and outcomes.

Authors:  Marian F MacDorman; Fay Menacker; Eugene Declercq
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.430

4.  Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.

Authors:  Jarrod K H Tan; Eng Loy Tan; Devendra Kanagalingan; Lay Kok Tan
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 1.730

5.  Using a Caesarean Section Classification System based on characteristics of the population as a way of monitoring obstetric practice.

Authors:  Maria L Costa; Jose G Cecatti; João P Souza; Helaine M Milanez; Metin A Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 6.  Classifications for cesarean section: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Regina Torloni; Ana Pilar Betran; Joao Paulo Souza; Mariana Widmer; Tomas Allen; Metin Gulmezoglu; Mario Merialdi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Trend and socio-demographic differentials of Caesarean section rate in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: analysis based on Ethiopia demographic and health surveys data.

Authors:  Samson Gebremedhin
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Rising trends and inequalities in cesarean section rates in Pakistan: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Surveys, 1990-2013.

Authors:  Sarwat Mumtaz; Jinwook Bahk; Young-Ho Khang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Perceived barriers to maternal and newborn health services delivery: a qualitative study of health workers and community members in low and middle-income settings.

Authors:  Joshua Sumankuuro; Judith Crockett; Shaoyu Wang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data.

Authors:  J Ye; J Zhang; R Mikolajczyk; M R Torloni; A M Gülmezoglu; A P Betran
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.