Literature DB >> 25371294

Rational dissection of a high institutional cesarean section rate: an analysis using the Robson Ten Group Classification System.

Jarrod K H Tan1, Eng Loy Tan, Devendra Kanagalingan, Lay Kok Tan.   

Abstract

AIM: Cesarean section (CS) rates have risen far in excess of the optimal 15% recommended by the World Health Organization. The Robson Ten Group Classification System (TGCS) allows meaningful analysis of a CS rate. The aim of this study is to identify the leading patient categories contributing to our institution's CS rate.
METHODS: Prospective study of all women who delivered at the Singapore General Hospital from January 2008 to December 2011. The following data was recorded: parity, singleton/multiple pregnancy, previous CS, mode of labor onset and gestational age at delivery. CS rates were computed for each group, as well as their relative contribution to the overall CS rate.
RESULTS: There were 6074 deliveries, in which 2011 (33.1%) women had CS delivery. Group 5 was the largest contributor to the overall CS rate (25.9%). Of the patients in this group, 18.8% had a successful vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). Group 2 was the second largest contributor to the overall CS rate at 18.0%. Group 10 had a high contribution of 16.1%.
CONCLUSION: The TGCS allows easy identification of the leading contributing patient groups. The surprisingly high contribution of group 10 suggests that our institution, a tertiary multidisciplinary teaching hospital, manages a sizeable group of high-risk patients in its obstetric case mix accounting for the high CS rate. Almost one in five term pregnancies with one previous CS had a successful vaginal delivery, suggesting that the institutional attempted VBAC rate is higher than 20%.
© 2014 The Authors. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research © 2014 Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ten Group Classification System (TGCS); cesarean section; cesarean section rates; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25371294     DOI: 10.1111/jog.12608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res        ISSN: 1341-8076            Impact factor:   1.730


  4 in total

1.  Are freestanding midwifery units a safe alternative to obstetric units for low-risk, primiparous childbirth? An analysis of effect differences by parity in a matched cohort study.

Authors:  Louise Fischer Christensen; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.007

2.  Pregnancy outcomes of women with previous caesarean sections: Secondary analysis of World Health Organization Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health.

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon; Siwanon Rattanakanokchai; Joshua P Vogel; A Metin Gülmezoglu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Analysis of Cesarean Sections using Robson's Ten Group Classification System.

Authors:  Rashida Parveen; Mehnaz Khakwani; Anum Naz; Rabia Bhatti
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2021 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.088

4.  The Effects of Childbirth Age on Maternal and Infant Outcomes in Pregnant Women.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Junhu Wang; Shuxia Xuan; Guiying Fang; Jinjing Tian; Yucui Teng
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.429

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.