INTRODUCTION: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is used in patients with osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management to reduce pain, improve functional outcomes and ultimately quality of life. However, less than optimal patient satisfaction has led to continued improvements in design and technology of TKA. One factor that can limit patient satisfaction is postero-lateral overhang of the tibial baseplate. The purpose of our study is to utilize pre-operative CT scans to assess the prevalence of posterolateral tibial overhang with the use of a symmetric tibial baseplate component in a popular knee system with robotic assistance. METHODS: Ninety-eight (98) consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included in this study. Using both the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle and the medial ⅓ of the tibial tubercle as reference points, we quantified the extent of posterolateral overhang when determining the rotation of the tibial component. RESULTS: Using the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle as a reference point for rotation of the tibial baseplate, 63% of the instances of reviewed CT scans (369/588) had posterolateral overhang. Furthermore, 81% (406/588) had posterolateral overhang when using the medial ⅓ aspect of the tibial tubercle as the reference for rotation of the tibial baseplate. The average posterolateral tibial baseplate overhang was 1.5 mm (range 0-8 mm) when using the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle and 2.4 mm (range 0-8 mm) when using the medial ⅓ tibial tubercle as the centering point for the tibial baseplate. DISCUSSION: Tibial baseplate overhang could lead to potential pain from irritation of soft tissues. To our knowledge, this is the first study that was able to valencquantify the amount of tibial baseplate overhang using pre-operative CT scans. Rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate needs to be balanced to ensure minimal lateral overhang while achieving sufficient external rotation of the tibial component. An asymmetric tibial component may provide a compromise in certain situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level IV case series.
INTRODUCTION: Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is used in patients with osteoarthritis who have failed conservative management to reduce pain, improve functional outcomes and ultimately quality of life. However, less than optimal patient satisfaction has led to continued improvements in design and technology of TKA. One factor that can limit patient satisfaction is postero-lateral overhang of the tibial baseplate. The purpose of our study is to utilize pre-operative CT scans to assess the prevalence of posterolateral tibial overhang with the use of a symmetric tibial baseplate component in a popular knee system with robotic assistance. METHODS: Ninety-eight (98) consecutive patients who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were included in this study. Using both the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle and the medial ⅓ of the tibial tubercle as reference points, we quantified the extent of posterolateral overhang when determining the rotation of the tibial component. RESULTS: Using the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle as a reference point for rotation of the tibial baseplate, 63% of the instances of reviewed CT scans (369/588) had posterolateral overhang. Furthermore, 81% (406/588) had posterolateral overhang when using the medial ⅓ aspect of the tibial tubercle as the reference for rotation of the tibial baseplate. The average posterolateral tibial baseplate overhang was 1.5 mm (range 0-8 mm) when using the most medial aspect of the tibial tubercle and 2.4 mm (range 0-8 mm) when using the medial ⅓ tibial tubercle as the centering point for the tibial baseplate. DISCUSSION: Tibial baseplate overhang could lead to potential pain from irritation of soft tissues. To our knowledge, this is the first study that was able to valencquantify the amount of tibial baseplate overhang using pre-operative CT scans. Rotational alignment of the tibial baseplate needs to be balanced to ensure minimal lateral overhang while achieving sufficient external rotation of the tibial component. An asymmetric tibial component may provide a compromise in certain situations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic level IV case series.
Authors: Donald G Eckhoff; David J Jacofsky; Bryan D Springer; Michael Dunbar; Jeffrey J Cherian; Randa K Elmallah; Michael A Mont; Kenneth A Greene Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Rajitha Gunaratne; Dylan N Pratt; Joseph Banda; Daniel P Fick; Riaz J K Khan; Brett W Robertson Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2017-07-21 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Bradley P Graw; Alexander H Harris; Krishna R Tripuraneni; Nicholas J Giori Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Andrew J Price; Abtin Alvand; Anders Troelsen; Jeffrey N Katz; Gary Hooper; Alastair Gray; Andrew Carr; David Beard Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-11-03 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.176