Literature DB >> 15692300

Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons.

Fu-Shing Lee1, Lois J Matthews, Judy R Dubno, John H Mills.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pure-tone thresholds for conventional and extended high frequencies were analyzed for 188 older adult human subjects (91 females, 97 males). The objectives were to study longitudinal changes in thresholds as well as the effects of initial threshold levels, age, gender, and noise history on these longitudinal changes.
DESIGN: At the time of entry into the study, subjects' ages ranged from 60 to 81 years, with a mean age of 68 years. Subjects had between 2 and 21 visits (mean = 9.81 visits) over a period of 3 to 11.5 years (mean = 6.40 years). Conventional pure-tone thresholds at 0.25 to 8 kHz were measured during most visits. Extended high-frequency (EHF) thresholds at 9 to 18 kHz were measured every 2 to 3 years. The slope of a linear regression was used to estimate the rate of change in pure-tone thresholds at 0.25 to 18 kHz for each ear. A questionnaire was used to identify those subjects with a positive noise history.
RESULTS: The average rate of change in thresholds was 0.7 dB per year at 0.25 kHz, increasing gradually to 1.2 dB per year at 8 kHz and 1.23 dB per year at 12 kHz. The rate of change for thresholds increased significantly with age, at 0.25 to 3, 10, and 11 kHz for females and at 6 kHz for males. After adjusting for age, females had a significantly slower rate of change at 1 kHz but a significantly faster rate of change at 6 to 12 kHz than males. For 0.25 and 1 kHz, subjects with more hearing loss at higher frequencies had a faster rate of change at these frequencies, whereas for 6 and 8 kHz, subjects with more hearing loss at mid and high frequencies had a slower rate of change at these frequencies. The rates of threshold change for subjects with a positive noise history were not statistically different from those with a negative noise history.
CONCLUSIONS: On average, hearing threshold increased approximately 1 dB per year for subjects age 60 and over. Age, gender, and initial threshold levels can affect the rate of change in thresholds. Older female subjects (> or =70 years) had faster rate of change at 0.25 to 3, 10, and 11 kHz than younger female subjects (60 to 69 years). Older male subjects had faster rate of change at 6 kHz than younger male subjects. Females had a slower rate of change at 1 kHz and a faster rate of change at 6 to 12 kHz than males. Subjects with higher initial thresholds at low and mid frequencies tended to have faster rate of threshold change at 0.25 to 2 kHz in the following years. Subjects with higher initial thresholds at mid and higher frequencies tended to have slower rate of change at 6 to 8 kHz in the following years. Noise history did not have a significant effect on the rate of threshold changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15692300     DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200502000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  65 in total

Review 1.  Assembly and insertion of a self-fitting hearing aid: design of effective instruction materials.

Authors:  Andrea Caposecco; Louise Hickson; Carly Meyer
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2012-03-02

2.  A twin-study of genetic contributions to hearing acuity in late middle age.

Authors:  Arthur Wingfield; Mathew Panizzon; Michael D Grant; Rosemary Toomey; William S Kremen; Carol E Franz; Kristen C Jacobson; Seth A Eisen; Michael Lyons
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 6.053

3.  Auditory cortex signs of age-related hearing loss.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Stephanie L Cute; Kenneth I Vaden; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-05-23

4.  Progression of Hearing Loss in the Aging Population: Repeated Auditory Measurements in the Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Stephanie C Rigters; Marc P van der Schroeff; Grigorios Papageorgiou; Robert J Baatenburg de Jong; André Goedegebure
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 1.854

5.  [Examination of speech perception and cognitive functioning in the elderly].

Authors:  H Meister; S Schreitmüller; L Grugel; M Landwehr; H von Wedel; M Walger; I Meister
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  Speech recognition across the lifespan: Longitudinal changes from middle age to older adults.

Authors:  Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 1.493

Review 7.  Intra- and Intersubject Variability in Audiometric Measures and Loudness Judgments in Older Listeners with Normal Hearing.

Authors:  Monica L Hawley; LaGuinn P Sherlock; Craig Formby
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2017-02

8.  Aging after noise exposure: acceleration of cochlear synaptopathy in "recovered" ears.

Authors:  Katharine A Fernandez; Penelope W C Jeffers; Kumud Lall; M Charles Liberman; Sharon G Kujawa
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  High-frequency hearing thresholds: effects of age, occupational ultrasound and noise exposure.

Authors:  Isabella Maccà; Maria Luisa Scapellato; Mariella Carrieri; Stefano Maso; Andrea Trevisan; Giovanni Battista Bartolucci
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Lipid and C-reactive protein levels as risk factors for hearing loss in older adults.

Authors:  Annie N Simpson; Lois J Matthews; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.497

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.