Literature DB >> 33673850

A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yuan Liu1, Yi Zeng1,2, Yuangang Wu1, Mingyang Li1, Huiqi Xie1, Bin Shen3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Whether the cement should be used in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was still in controversy. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of two kinds of fixation.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective/retrospective observational studies from PubMed (on 2019 September), EMBASE (on 2019 September), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Web of Science (on 2019 September) were searched. Only studies followed more than 2 years was included for the review. The PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook were adopted to assess the quality of the results reported in included studies to ensure that the results of our meta-analysis were reliable and veritable. The continuous and dichotomous outcomes were collected in a standard form, and the data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Finally, the results were presented in the Forest plots.
RESULTS: Twenty-six studies involving 2369 patients in cementless TKA and 2654 patients in cemented TKA were included. The rate of revision was not significantly different in two groups (p = 0.55). More than eight reasons caused revision were found in our study, the aseptic loosing was the most common, followed by the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), neither was significantly different (p = 0.88 and 0.45, respectively). While significantly better long-term functional recovery was found in cementless TKA in terms of Knee Society Function Score (p = 0.004) and manipulation under anesthesia (p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Cementless fixation did not decrease the rate of revision after the total knee arthroplasty compared with the cemented fixation, while the long-term functional recovery was significantly better in the cementless group.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cement; Cementless; Meta-analysis; Systematical review; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 33673850     DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02299-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  37 in total

1.  Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument.

Authors:  Karem Slim; Emile Nini; Damien Forestier; Fabrice Kwiatkowski; Yves Panis; Jacques Chipponi
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Results of 1,000 Performance knees: cementless versus cemented fixation.

Authors:  R W Bassett
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Cemented versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabrizio Matassi; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-01-08

Review 4.  Wear and osteolysis around total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Douglas D R Naudie; Deborah J Ammeen; Gerard A Engh; Cecil H Rorabeck
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Cementless total knee replacement in patients 50 years old and under.

Authors:  D S Hungerford; K A Krackow; R V Kenna
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  Cefuroxime-impregnated cement in primary total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized study of three hundred and forty knees.

Authors:  Fang-Yao Chiu; Chuan-Mu Chen; Chien-Fu Jeff Lin; Wai-Hee Lo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Despite Improved Survivorship of Uncemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, Cemented Fixation Remains the Gold Standard: An Analysis of a National Joint Registry.

Authors:  Mary Nugent; Michael C Wyatt; Christopher M Frampton; Gary J Hooper
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Future young patient demand for primary and revision joint replacement: national projections from 2010 to 2030.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Ke Zhao; Michael Kelly; Kevin J Bozic
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Lisa Hartling; Maria Ospina; Yuanyuan Liang; Donna M Dryden; Nicola Hooton; Jennifer Krebs Seida; Terry P Klassen
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2009-10-19
View more
  2 in total

1.  Short- to Mid-Term Clinical Outcomes of Posterior-Stabilized Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty with Trabecular Metal Components.

Authors:  Takashige Momose; Yukio Nakamura; Masaki Nakano; Takashi Maeda; Susumu Morioka; Atsushi Sobajima; Yukio Nakatsuchi; Jun Takahashi; Masashi Nawata
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 2.423

2.  The Use of Cement and Tourniquet During Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase the Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Postoperatively.

Authors:  Leanne Ludwick; Noam Shohat; Matthew B Sherman; Joseph Paladino; Jonathan Ledesma; Yale Fillingham
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-09-27
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.