Literature DB >> 31031155

Despite Improved Survivorship of Uncemented Fixation in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis, Cemented Fixation Remains the Gold Standard: An Analysis of a National Joint Registry.

Mary Nugent1, Michael C Wyatt2, Christopher M Frampton3, Gary J Hooper4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) numbers are increasing worldwide. While cement fixation for both femoral and tibial components is commonly used, alternatives include hybrid and uncemented TKAs. This study aimed to evaluate survivorship, revision rates, and patient-reported outcomes for cemented, hybrid, and uncemented TKAs using New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR) data.
METHODS: NZJR data relating to all TKAs performed during the 19 years up to the end of December 2017 were analyzed. Outcomes were assessed using prosthesis survivorship data (including reasons for revision) and Oxford scores at 6 months, 5 years, and 10 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: A total 96,519 primary TKAs were performed during the period examined. Most (91.5%) were fully cemented with 4.8% hybrid and 3.7% uncemented. Mean Oxford scores at 6 months were highest in cemented and lowest in uncemented TKAs (P < .001). However, this was not clinically significant. There was no difference at 5 or 10 years. Ten-year survival rates were 97%, 94.5%, and 95.8% for cemented, uncemented, and hybrid TKAs, respectively. Revision rates were 0.47, 0.74, and 0.52 per 100 component years for cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses, respectively. The revision rate for uncemented prostheses compared with cemented was higher (P < .001). When stratified by age group, there were differences in survival rates between cemented and uncemented groups (P = .001) and hybrid and uncemented groups (P = .038) in patients aged <55 years; between cemented and uncemented groups in those aged 55-64 years (P = .031); and between cemented and hybrid groups in those aged >75 years (P = .004).
CONCLUSION: Uncemented TKAs had similar patient-reported outcomes but higher revision rates and worse survivorship compared with hybrid or fully cemented TKAs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cemented; joint registry; knee arthroplasty; survivorship; uncemented

Year:  2019        PMID: 31031155     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  The mid-term survival of cemented, uncemented, and hybrid fixation of the ACS mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Laurian J M van Es; Inger N Sierevelt; Daniël Hoornenborg; Bas van Ooij; Daniël Haverkamp
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 1.033

2.  Survival rate of cemented versus cementless tibial component in primary total knee arthroplasty over 5 years of follow-up: comparative study of 109 prostheses.

Authors:  Victor Pacoret; Etienne Kalk; Ludovic Labattut; Guillaume Girardot; Emmanuel Baulot; Pierre Martz
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2020-09-08

Review 3.  A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Yi Zeng; Yuangang Wu; Mingyang Li; Huiqi Xie; Bin Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  A controlled release bupivacaine-alginate construct: Effect on chondrocyte hypertrophy conversion.

Authors:  Mollie S Davis; Ileana Marrero-Berrios; Xiomara I Perez; Palangat Radhakrishnan; Devasena Manchikalapati; Khaja Ahmed; Hattiyangangadi Kamath; Rene S Schloss; Joel Yarmush
Journal:  Osteoarthr Cartil Open       Date:  2020-11-19

5.  Editorial: Different, yet strong together: the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association (NARA).

Authors:  Keijo Mäkelä; Nils P Hailer
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.717

6.  The effect of patient and prosthesis factors on revision rates after total knee replacement using a multi-registry meta-analytic approach.

Authors:  Peter L Lewis; Annette W-Dahl; Otto Robertsson; Michelle Lorimer; Heather A Prentice; Stephen E Graves; Elizabeth W Paxton
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.