Literature DB >> 9645521

Results of 1,000 Performance knees: cementless versus cemented fixation.

R W Bassett1.   

Abstract

A total of 893 patients with 1,000 Performance total knee prostheses were retrospectively studied. The mean follow-up was 5.2 years. In 584 cases, the femoral and tibial components were implanted using cementless techniques, and in 416 knees the femoral and tibial components were cemented. All patients received a cemented all polyethylene patellar replacement. Tibial bone density determined fixation type. The average age of patients with cementless fixation was 64.3 years versus 76.2 years for patients with cemented implants. The average subjective and functional Knee Society scores were 91.2 and 90.1 for patients with cementless knees and 89.6 and 83.5 for those with cemented replacements. A surprising absence of osteolysis around screw fixation was noted, and at 5 years, there was 99% implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9645521     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(98)90006-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  16 in total

1.  Total knee arthroplasty using cementless keels and cemented tibial trays: 10-year results.

Authors:  Frank R Kolisek; Michael A Mont; Thorsten M Seyler; David R Marker; Nenette M Jessup; Junaed A Siddiqui; Eric Monesmith; Slif D Ulrich
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Similar survival between uncemented and cemented fixation prostheses in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic comparative analysis using registers.

Authors:  Hongchuan Wang; Hua Lou; Huiwei Zhang; Junwei Jiang; Kai Liu
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Cemented versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Fabrizio Matassi; Christian Carulli; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2014-01-08

4.  Does computer-assisted surgery influence survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis? A 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Hervé Ouanezar; Florent Franck; Alexandre Jacquel; Vincent Pibarot; Julien Wegrzyn
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  No difference between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty in young patients: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Edoardo Franceschetti; Guglielmo Torre; Alessio Palumbo; Rocco Papalia; Jón Karlsson; Olufemi R Ayeni; Kristian Samuelsson; Francesco Franceschi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mariano Fernandez-Fairen; Daniel Hernández-Vaquero; Antonio Murcia; Ana Torres; Rafael Llopis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Hybrid micro/nano-topography of a TiO2 nanotube-coated commercial zirconia femoral knee implant promotes bone cell adhesion in vitro.

Authors:  Christine J Frandsen; Kunbae Noh; Karla S Brammer; Gary Johnston; Sungho Jin
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better?

Authors:  Young-Hoo Kim; Jang-Won Park; Hyung-Mook Lim; Eun-Soo Park
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  SCREW MIGRATION IN TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY: CLINICAL REPORT.

Authors:  Fernando Fonseca; José Tomé; Manuel Barreto
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-11-16

10.  Noncemented total knee arthroplasty with a local prophylactic anti-infection agent: a prospective series of 135 cases.

Authors:  Michel Assor
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.089

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.