Literature DB >> 33672128

A History of Fluid Management-From "One Size Fits All" to an Individualized Fluid Therapy in Burn Resuscitation.

Dorothee Boehm1, Henrik Menke1.   

Abstract

Fluid management is a cornerstone in the treatment of burns and, thus, many different formulas were tested for their ability to match the fluid requirements for an adequate resuscitation. Thereof, the Parkland-Baxter formula, first introduced in 1968, is still widely used since then. Though using nearly the same formula to start off, the definition of normovolemia and how to determine the volume status of burn patients has changed dramatically over years. In first instance, the invention of the transpulmonary thermodilution (TTD) enabled an early goal directed fluid therapy with acceptable invasiveness. Furthermore, the introduction of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) has triggered more individualized schemes of fluid therapy. This article explores the historical developments in the field of burn resuscitation, presenting different options to determine the fluid requirements without missing the red flags for hyper- or hypovolemia. Furthermore, the increasing rate of co-morbidities in burn patients calls for a more sophisticated fluid management adjusting the fluid therapy to the actual necessities very closely. Therefore, formulas might be used as a starting point, but further fluid therapy should be adjusted to the actual need of every single patient. Taking the developments in the field of individualized therapies in intensive care in general into account, fluid management in burn resuscitation will also be individualized in the near future.

Entities:  

Keywords:  burn resuscitation; fluid management; resuscitation volume; transpulmonary thermodilution; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33672128      PMCID: PMC7926800          DOI: 10.3390/medicina57020187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)        ISSN: 1010-660X            Impact factor:   2.430


  58 in total

1.  On the mechanical factors which determine the output of the ventricles.

Authors:  S W Patterson; E H Starling
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1914-09-08       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 2.  The phenomenon of "fluid creep" in acute burn resuscitation.

Authors:  Jeffrey I L Saffle
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2007 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.845

Review 3.  American Burn Association practice guidelines burn shock resuscitation.

Authors:  Tam N Pham; Leopoldo C Cancio; Nicole S Gibran
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.845

4.  Base deficit as an indicator or resuscitation needs in patients with burn injuries.

Authors:  K L Kaups; J W Davis; W J Dominic
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

5.  Influence of Diaphragmatic Motion on Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Respiratory Variations in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Lucile Gignon; Claire Roger; Sophie Bastide; Sandrine Alonso; Laurent Zieleskiewicz; Hervé Quintard; Lana Zoric; Xavier Bobbia; Mathieu Raux; Marc Leone; Jean-Yves Lefrant; Laurent Muller
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Resuscitation of severely burned military casualties: fluid begets more fluid.

Authors:  Kevin K Chung; Steven E Wolf; Leopoldo C Cancio; Ricardo Alvarado; John A Jones; Jeffery McCorcle; Booker T King; David J Barillo; Evan M Renz; Lorne H Blackbourne
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-08

7.  How well does the Parkland formula estimate actual fluid resuscitation volumes?

Authors:  Robert C Cartotto; Marilyn Innes; Melinda A Musgrave; Manuel Gomez; Andrew B Cooper
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

8.  Resuscitation of thermal injuries in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Authors:  R H J Baker; M A Akhavani; N Jallali
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Hold the Pendulum: Rates of Acute Kidney Injury are Increased in Patients Who Receive Resuscitation Volumes Less than Predicted by the Parkland Equation.

Authors:  Stephanie A Mason; Avery B Nathens; Celeste C Finnerty; Richard L Gamelli; Nicole S Gibran; Brett D Arnoldo; Ronald G Tompkins; David N Herndon; Marc G Jeschke
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Adequate resuscitation of burn patients may not be measured by urine output and vital signs.

Authors:  D J Dries; K Waxman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Anesthetic Management of Adults With Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Authors:  Brita M Mittal; Candida L Goodnough; Erin Bushell; Sophia Turkmani-Bazzi; Kelly Sheppard
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 2.  Therapeutic Strategies to Reduce Burn Wound Conversion.

Authors:  Alen Palackic; Jayson W Jay; Robert P Duggan; Ludwik K Branski; Steven E Wolf; Naseem Ansari; Amina El Ayadi
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 3.  Sepsis in Burns-Lessons Learnt from Developments in the Management of Septic Shock.

Authors:  Dorothee Boehm; Henrik Menke
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.