Literature DB >> 27003619

Influence of Diaphragmatic Motion on Inferior Vena Cava Diameter Respiratory Variations in Healthy Volunteers.

Lucile Gignon1, Claire Roger, Sophie Bastide, Sandrine Alonso, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Hervé Quintard, Lana Zoric, Xavier Bobbia, Mathieu Raux, Marc Leone, Jean-Yves Lefrant, Laurent Muller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The collapsibility index of inferior vena cava (cIVC) is widely used to decide fluid infusion in spontaneously breathing intensive care unit patients. The authors hypothesized that high inspiratory efforts may induce false-positive high cIVC values. This study aims at determining a value of diaphragmatic motion recorded by echography that could predict a high cIVC (more than or equal to 40%) in healthy volunteers.
METHODS: The cIVC and diaphragmatic motions were recorded for three levels of inspiratory efforts. Right and left diaphragmatic motions were defined as the maximal diaphragmatic excursions. Receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the performance of right diaphragmatic motion to predict a cIVC more than or equal to 40% defining the best cutoff value.
RESULTS: Among 52 included volunteers, interobserver reproducibility showed a generalized concordance correlation coefficient (ρc) above 0.9 for all echographic parameters. Right diaphragmatic motion correlated with cIVC (r = 0.64, P < 0.0001). Univariate analyses did not show association between cIVC and age, sex, weight, height, or body mass index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for cIVC more than or equal to 40% was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.81 to 0.93). The best diaphragmatic motion cutoff was 28 mm (Youden Index, 0.65) with sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 77%. The gray zone area was 25 to 43 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Inferior vena cava collapsibility is affected by diaphragmatic motion. During low inspiratory effort, diaphragmatic motion was less than 25 mm and predicted a cIVC less than 40%. During maximal inspiratory effort, diaphragmatic motion was more than 43 mm and predicted a cIVC more than 40%. When diaphragmatic motion ranged from 25 to 43 mm, no conclusion on cIVC value could be done.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27003619     DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

1.  Ten situations where inferior vena cava ultrasound may fail to accurately predict fluid responsiveness: a physiologically based point of view.

Authors:  G Via; G Tavazzi; S Price
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Performance of a 25% Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility in Detecting Fluid Responsiveness When Assessed by Novice Versus Expert Physician Sonologists.

Authors:  Keith A Corl; Nader Azab; Mohammed Nayeemuddin; Alexandra Schick; Thomas Lopardo; Fatima Zeba; Gary Phillips; Grayson Baird; Roland C Merchant; Mitchell M Levy; Michael Blaivas; Adeel Abbasi
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.510

Review 3.  Focused Real-Time Ultrasonography for Nephrologists.

Authors:  Matthew J Kaptein; Elaine M Kaptein
Journal:  Int J Nephrol       Date:  2017-02-02

Review 4.  Echocardiography as a guide for fluid management.

Authors:  John H Boyd; Demetrios Sirounis; Julien Maizel; Michel Slama
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Measurement site of inferior vena cava diameter affects the accuracy with which fluid responsiveness can be predicted in spontaneously breathing patients: a post hoc analysis of two prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Morgan Caplan; Arthur Durand; Perrine Bortolotti; Delphine Colling; Julien Goutay; Thibault Duburcq; Elodie Drumez; Anahita Rouze; Saad Nseir; Michael Howsam; Thierry Onimus; Raphael Favory; Sebastien Preau
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 6.925

Review 6.  A History of Fluid Management-From "One Size Fits All" to an Individualized Fluid Therapy in Burn Resuscitation.

Authors:  Dorothee Boehm; Henrik Menke
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 2.430

7.  Influence of the Respiratory Cycle on Caudal Vena Cava Diameter Measured by Sonography in Healthy Foals: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  M C Tuplin; A E Romero; S R Boysen
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  Respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with cardiac arrhythmias.

Authors:  Perrine Bortolotti; Delphine Colling; Vincent Colas; Benoit Voisin; Florent Dewavrin; Julien Poissy; Patrick Girardie; Maeva Kyheng; Fabienne Saulnier; Raphael Favory; Sebastien Preau
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 6.925

9.  Haemodynamic monitoring of COVID-19 patients: Classical methods and new paradigms.

Authors:  Karim Bendjelid; Laurent Muller
Journal:  Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.132

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.