Literature DB >> 33671609

A Review on Human-AI Interaction in Machine Learning and Insights for Medical Applications.

Mansoureh Maadi1, Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi1, Uwe Aickelin1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To provide a human-Artificial Intelligence (AI) interaction review for Machine Learning (ML) applications to inform how to best combine both human domain expertise and computational power of ML methods. The review focuses on the medical field, as the medical ML application literature highlights a special necessity of medical experts collaborating with ML approaches.
METHODS: A scoping literature review is performed on Scopus and Google Scholar using the terms "human in the loop", "human in the loop machine learning", and "interactive machine learning". Peer-reviewed papers published from 2015 to 2020 are included in our review.
RESULTS: We design four questions to investigate and describe human-AI interaction in ML applications. These questions are "Why should humans be in the loop?", "Where does human-AI interaction occur in the ML processes?", "Who are the humans in the loop?", and "How do humans interact with ML in Human-In-the-Loop ML (HILML)?". To answer the first question, we describe three main reasons regarding the importance of human involvement in ML applications. To address the second question, human-AI interaction is investigated in three main algorithmic stages: 1. data producing and pre-processing; 2. ML modelling; and 3. ML evaluation and refinement. The importance of the expertise level of the humans in human-AI interaction is described to answer the third question. The number of human interactions in HILML is grouped into three categories to address the fourth question. We conclude the paper by offering a discussion on open opportunities for future research in HILML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  human-in-the-loop machine learning; human–AI interaction; interactive machine learning; medical applications

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33671609      PMCID: PMC7926732          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18042121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  11 in total

1.  Smart computational exploration of stochastic gene regulatory network models using human-in-the-loop semi-supervised learning.

Authors:  Fredrik Wrede; Andreas Hellander
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-12-15       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Active deep learning to detect demographic traits in free-form clinical notes.

Authors:  Amir Feder; Danny Vainstein; Roni Rosenfeld; Tzvika Hartman; Avinatan Hassidim; Yossi Matias
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  The role of human in the loop: lessons from D3R challenge 4.

Authors:  Oleg V Stroganov; Fedor N Novikov; Michael G Medvedev; Artem O Dmitrienko; Igor Gerasimov; Igor V Svitanko; Ghermes G Chilov
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 3.686

Review 4.  A review of feature selection methods in medical applications.

Authors:  Beatriz Remeseiro; Veronica Bolon-Canedo
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning.

Authors:  Volodymyr Mnih; Koray Kavukcuoglu; David Silver; Andrei A Rusu; Joel Veness; Marc G Bellemare; Alex Graves; Martin Riedmiller; Andreas K Fidjeland; Georg Ostrovski; Stig Petersen; Charles Beattie; Amir Sadik; Ioannis Antonoglou; Helen King; Dharshan Kumaran; Daan Wierstra; Shane Legg; Demis Hassabis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Leveraging the Wisdom of the Crowd for Fine-Grained Recognition.

Authors:  Jia Deng; Jonathan Krause; Michael Stark; Li Fei-Fei
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.226

7.  Interactive machine learning for health informatics: when do we need the human-in-the-loop?

Authors:  Andreas Holzinger
Journal:  Brain Inform       Date:  2016-03-02

8.  Crowdsourcing image analysis for plant phenomics to generate ground truth data for machine learning.

Authors:  Naihui Zhou; Zachary D Siegel; Scott Zarecor; Nigel Lee; Darwin A Campbell; Carson M Andorf; Dan Nettleton; Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill; Baskar Ganapathysubramanian; Jonathan W Kelly; Iddo Friedberg
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 4.475

9.  ezTag: tagging biomedical concepts via interactive learning.

Authors:  Dongseop Kwon; Sun Kim; Chih-Hsuan Wei; Robert Leaman; Zhiyong Lu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2018-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Integrating Expert Knowledge with Data in Bayesian Networks: Preserving Data-Driven Expectations when the Expert Variables Remain Unobserved.

Authors:  Anthony Costa Constantinou; Norman Fenton; Martin Neil
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 6.954

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Predicting Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Scoping Review of Machine Learning Approaches.

Authors:  Sara Chopannejad; Farahnaz Sadoughi; Rafat Bagherzadeh; Sakineh Shekarchi
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 2.762

2.  Infodemic Management Using Digital Information and Knowledge Cocreation to Address COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: Case Study From Ghana.

Authors:  Anna-Leena Lohiniva; Anastasiya Nurzhynska; Al-Hassan Hudi; Bridget Anim; Da Costa Aboagye
Journal:  JMIR Infodemiology       Date:  2022-07-12

Review 3.  Machine Learning for Acute Kidney Injury Prediction in the Intensive Care Unit.

Authors:  Eric R Gottlieb; Mathew Samuel; Joseph V Bonventre; Leo A Celi; Heather Mattie
Journal:  Adv Chronic Kidney Dis       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 4.305

Review 4.  Potential benefits and limitations of machine learning in the field of eating disorders: current research and future directions.

Authors:  Jasmine Fardouly; Ross D Crosby; Suku Sukunesan
Journal:  J Eat Disord       Date:  2022-05-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.