| Literature DB >> 33665499 |
Marla Cuppini1, Isadora Martini Garcia1, Virgínia Serra de Souza2, Kelly Cristine Zatta3, Fernanda Visioli4, Vicente Castelo Branco Leitune1, Sílvia Stanisçuazki Guterres5, Jackson Damiani Scholten2, Fabrício Mezzomo Collares1.
Abstract
Resin infiltrants have been effectively applied in dentistry to manage non-cavitated carious lesions in proximal dental surfaces. However, the common formulations are composed of inert methacrylate monomers. In this study, we developed a novel resin infiltrant with microcapsules loaded with an ionic liquid (MC-IL), and analyzed the physical properties and cytotoxicity of the dental resin. First, the ionic liquid 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide (BMI.NTf2) was synthesized. BMI.NTf2 has previously shown antibacterial activity in a dental resin. Then, MC-IL were synthesized by the deposition of a preformed polymer. The MC-IL were analyzed for particle size and de-agglomeration effect via laser diffraction analysis and shape via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The infiltrants were formulated, and the MC-IL were incorporated at 2.5%, 5%, and 10 wt%. A group without MC-IL was used as a control. The infiltrants were evaluated for ultimate tensile strength (UTS), contact angle, surface free energy (SFE), and cytotoxicity. The MC-IL showed a mean particle size of 1.64 (±0.08) μm, shriveled aspect, and a de-agglomeration profile suggestive of nanoparticles' presence in the synthesized powder. There were no differences in UTS among groups (p > 0.05). The incorporation of 10 wt% of MC-IL increased the contact angle (p < 0.05), while the addition from 5 wt% reduced the SFE in comparison to the control group (p < 0.05). The human cell viability was above 90% for all groups (p > 0.05). The incorporation of microcapsules as a drug-delivery system for ionic liquids may be a promising strategy to improve dental restorative materials.Entities:
Keywords: Dental caries; Drug delivery systems; Mechanical; Polymers; Stress; Surface properties
Year: 2021 PMID: 33665499 PMCID: PMC7895677 DOI: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioact Mater ISSN: 2452-199X
Fig. 1Synthesis of the ionic liquid. The scheme displays the three steps for the ionic liquid (IL) BMI.NTf2 synthesis and evidences the IL molecular structure.
Fig. 2Synthesis of the microcapsules loaded with ionic liquid (MC-IL). The scheme displays the steps to synthesize the MC-IL from the mixture of solutions up to drying. The colors of the solutions are illustrated in pink, grey, and red for better visual characterization. However, all solutions were colorless after the dissolution of the reagents. A white powder was obtained at the end of the process and then incorporated into the resin infiltrant at different concentrations. Part of the powder's scanning electron microscopy image was added in the figure to illustrate that microcapsules formed the powder generated with the indicated morphology. The scheme also describes the formation of the microcapsules and their composition at the bottom of the figure.
Fig. 3Particle size analysis by laser diffraction. In the image A, the solid grey line represents the particle size profile in a dry dispersion. The solid black line represents the particle size profile in the de-agglomeration analysis, using water as a dispersion medium after 15 min (T1) and 30 min (T7) of contact between powder of MC-IL and water. The black dashed line represents the particle size profile in the de-agglomeration analysis, using water as a dispersion medium, after 30 min of contact between powder and water. In the image B, a illustration shows how the plasticizing effect of the polymeric chains of HPMC probably occurs up to the loss of HPMC and release of the nanocapsules from the microcapsules.
Percentiles of the size distribution (diameter) of the synthesized MC-IL in the dry dispersion and after the contact with water for 15 min (T1) and 30 min (T1). The analyses were performed using the laser diffraction method, and the results are expressed in micrometers (μm).
| Sample | 10th | 50th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|
| MC-IL (dry dispersion) | 0.935 | 1.545 | 2.522 |
| MC-IL (T1) | 0.077 | 0.158 | 0.600 |
| MC-IL (T7) | 0.071 | 0.147 | 0.343 |
Fig. 4SEM images of synthesized MC-IL. Image (A) shows the MC-IL with 5,000x magnification, image B shows with 8,500x magnification, and image C with 13,000x magnification.
Mean and standard deviation values of ultimate tensile strength (UTS), contact angle with water or α-bromonaphtalene, and surface free energy (SFE).
| Groups | UTS (MPa) | Contact Angle | SFE (mN/M) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | α-bromonaphtalene | |||
| Control | 65.67 (±4.97) A | 62.16 (±2.11) B | 11.07 (±2.66) B | 53.50 (±1.21) A |
| 2.5% MC-IL | 62.13 (±6.80) A | 65.74 (±3.81) B | 18.31 (±8.26) B | 50.71 (±1.91) AB |
| 5% MC-IL | 63.40 (±7.12) A | 68.66 (±3.23) B | 17.08 (±2.95) B | 49.70 (±1.57) B |
| 10% MC-IL | 69.88 (±9.08) A | 77.87 (±4.73) A | 35.04 (±4.49) A | 41.66 (±2.46) C |
Different capital letters indicate a statistically significant difference in the same column (p < 0.05).
Fig. 5Image (A) illustrates the cytotoxicity methodology. Image (B) shows the mean and standard deviation values of cell viability for each resin infiltrants group after the cytotoxicity test. The same letters indicate no statistical difference among groups (p > 0.05).
Fig. 6Schematic illustration of the dry process of the MC-IL.