Literature DB >> 18768217

Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.

Ralf Buergers1, Wulf Schneider-Brachert, Sebastian Hahnel, Martin Rosentritt, Gerhard Handel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare the susceptibility of one novel silorane-based and four widely used conventional methacrylate-based resin composites to adhere oral streptococci and to relate any differences to surface roughness, hydrophobicity and type of matrix.
METHODS: Specimens of restoratives Filtek Silorane, Filtek Z250, Tetric EvoCeram, Quixfil and Spectrum TPH were prepared (10.0-mm diameter, 2.0-mm height). Surface roughness was assessed by perthometer measurements and hydrophobicity according to water contact angles was determined by computerized image analysis. Bacterial suspensions of Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus gordonii and Streptococcus mutans were incubated for 2.5 h at 37 degrees C with 15 test specimens for each material and adhesion was quantified with fluorescence dye Alamar Blue/Resazurin and an automated multi-detection reader. Glass served as reference. Statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney U-test (alpha=0.05).
RESULTS: Median roughness values of all composites ranged between 0.04 and 0.11 microm, median contact angles between 59.7 degrees and 92.1 degrees. Significantly lowest fluorescence intensities of all test materials were found on Filtek Silorane for three of four streptococcal strains. The fluorescence intensities of the four conventional methacrylate resin composites were significantly higher and comparable among each other. SIGNIFICANCE: When compared against four conventional methacrylate composite resins, a general significance to a lower quantity of adhering streptococci was found on the novel silorane-based composite resin, which might result from its increased hydrophobicity. The low adhesion potential of the silorane-based composite may potentially improve the longevity of direct fillings and reduce recurrent caries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18768217     DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.07.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dent Mater        ISSN: 0109-5641            Impact factor:   5.304


  20 in total

1.  Marginal adaptation of a low-shrinkage silorane-based composite: 1-year randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Malene Schmidt; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang; Preben Hørsted-Bindslev; Sven Poulsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2010-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Five-year evaluation of a low-shrinkage Silorane resin composite material: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Malene Schmidt; Irene Dige; Lise-Lotte Kirkevang; Michael Vaeth; Preben Hørsted-Bindslev
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Durable bonds at the adhesive/dentin interface: an impossible mission or simply a moving target?

Authors:  Paulette Spencer; Qiang Ye Jonggu Park; Anil Misra; Brenda S Bohaty; Viraj Singh; Ranga Parthasarathy; Fábio Sene; Sérgio Eduardo de Paiva Gonçalves; Jennifer Laurence
Journal:  Braz Dent Sci       Date:  2012-01

4.  Restoration materials and secondary caries using an in vitro biofilm model.

Authors:  N K Kuper; F H van de Sande; N J M Opdam; E M Bronkhorst; J J de Soet; M S Cenci; M C D J N M Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 6.116

5.  Characterization and Streptococcus mutans adhesion on air polishing dentin.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Tada; Hirotake Oda; Michitomo Inatomi; Soh Sato
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 2.634

6.  Influence of matrix and filler fraction on biofilm formation on the surface of experimental resin-based composites.

Authors:  Andrei Ionescu; Eugenio Brambilla; Daniel S Wastl; Franz J Giessibl; Gloria Cazzaniga; Sibylle Schneider-Feyrer; Sebastian Hahnel
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  A reproducible oral microcosm biofilm model for testing dental materials.

Authors:  J D Rudney; R Chen; P Lenton; J Li; Y Li; R S Jones; C Reilly; A S Fok; C Aparicio
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.772

8.  The influence of different restorative materials on secondary caries development in situ.

Authors:  Françoise H van de Sande; Niek J M Opdam; Gert Jan Truin; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Johannes J de Soet; Maximiliano S Cenci; Marie-Charlotte Huysmans
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparative short-term in vitro analysis of mutans streptococci adhesion on esthetic, nickel-titanium, and stainless-steel arch wires.

Authors:  In-Hye Kim; Hyo-Sang Park; Young Kyung Kim; Kyo-Han Kim; Tae-Yub Kwon
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Bacterial viability and physical properties of antibacterially modified experimental dental resin composites.

Authors:  Stefan Rüttermann; Taina Trellenkamp; Nora Bergmann; Thomas Beikler; Helmut Ritter; Ralf Janda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.