| Literature DB >> 33665393 |
Joseph N Nwogu1, Chisaa O Igbolekwu2, Ezebunwa E Nwokocha1, Esther C Nwogu1, Obioha N Nwabugwu3, Ogadimma Arisukwu2.
Abstract
There is a prevalence of high fertility among the Mbaise of Imo State, Nigeria. This is linked to the perceptions, beliefs and practices of the people. The voluntaristic social action theory by Talcott Parsons and Proximate determinants of fertility framework by Bongaarts were utilized to highlight the links between Catholicism and fertility, as well as socio-cultural variables and fertility behaviour by showing strength of their separate and combined relationships. Data were gathered through survey questionnaire and in-depth interview. The findings from the study show that the factors affecting fertility among the Mbaise include communal and individual norms and practices, and their persistent influence signal a need to investigate their separate and combined influences on fertility behaviour. Specific findings were that: (1) Roman Catholicism is a factor responsible for the perceived high fertility among Mbaise people, (2) Roman Catholic fertility practices conform to the socio-cultural environment in the area (3) knowledge of contraceptives use is significantly low among the people of Mbaise. The negligible proportion that has used family planning methods did so for child spacing rather than for limiting fertility.Entities:
Keywords: Ewu-ukwu; Family planning; Fertility; Mbaise; Roman Catholicism; Socio-cultural norms
Year: 2021 PMID: 33665393 PMCID: PMC7900692 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Socio-demographic characteristics of respondents.
| Characteristics' | Categories | Frequency | Percent |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male | 78 | 43.6 | |
| Female | 101 | 56.4 | |
| Total | 179 | 100.0 | |
| <20 yrs | 2 | 1.2 | |
| 20–29yrs | 43 | 25.4 | |
| 30–39yrs | 48 | 28.4 | |
| 40–49yrs | 48 | 28.4 | |
| 50 + yrs | 28 | 16.6 | |
| Total | 169 | 100.0 | |
| Single | 58 | 32.4 | |
| Married | 111 | 62.0 | |
| Divorced | 1 | 0.6 | |
| Separated | 4 | 2.2 | |
| Widowed | 5 | 2.8 | |
| Total | 179 | 100.0 | |
| No formal education | 7 | 3.9 | |
| Primary school | 2 | 1.1 | |
| Secondary school | 18 | 10.1 | |
| Higher education | 151 | 84.8 | |
| Total | 178 | 100.0 | |
| Civil servant/teacher | 130 | 73.4 | |
| Business | 7 | 4.0 | |
| Farmer/Petty trader | 3 | 1.7 | |
| Clergy | 5 | 2.8 | |
| Unemployed | 19 | 10.7 | |
| Crafts/Artisans | 2 | 1.1 | |
| Students | 11 | 6.2 | |
| Total | 177 | 100.0 | |
| Catholics | 122 | 68.2 | |
| Non-Catholics | 57 | 31.8 | |
| Total | 179 | 100.0 |
Distribution of respondents by educational qualification and fertility.
| Fertility among the Mbaise | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| Educational Qualification | Low education | 61.1% (11) | 38.9% (7) | 100% (18) |
| Higher education | 43.3% (45) | 56.7% (59) | 100% (104) | |
| Total | 45.9% (56) | 54.1% (66) | 100% (122) | |
Distribution of respondents by Occupation and Fertility.
| Fertility among the Mbaise | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| Occupation | Civil Servants | 40.7% (37) | 59.3% (54) | 100% (18) |
| Non-civil servants | 61.3% (19) | 38.7% (12) | 100% (104) | |
| Total | 45.9% (56) | 54.1% (66) | 100% (122) | |
| Pearson chi-square (df) | 3.963 (1) | |||
| Significance value | 0.48 | |||
Distribution of respondents by Religion and Fertility.
| Fertility among the Mbaise | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| Religion | Catholics | 45.7% (37) | 54.3% (44) | 100% (81) |
| Non-Catholics | 46.3% (19) | 53.7% (22) | 100% (41) | |
| Total | 45.9% (56) | 54.1% (66) | 100% (122) | |
| Pearson Chi-Square (df) | 0.005 (1) | |||
| Significance value | .945 | |||
Distribution of Respondents by Knowledge of contraceptive methods.
| Types of contraceptives | Frequency and Percentage of Responses | |
|---|---|---|
| YES | NO | |
| Lactational Amenorrhea Methods | 13.97 (25) | 86.03 (154) |
| Intrauterine Device Method | 21.79 (39) | 78.21 (140) |
| Condom Method | 41.90 (75) | 58.10 (104) |
| Combined Oral Contraceptives Method | 24.02 (43) | 75.98 (135) |
| Female Barrier Method | 15.08 (27) | 84.92 (152) |
| Vasectomy Method | 14.53 (26) | 85.47 (153) |
| Tubal Ligation Method | 14.53 (26) | 85.47 (153) |
| Progestin-only Oral Contraceptive Method | 13.97 (25) | 86.03 (154) |
| Norplant Implants Method | 10.06 (18) | 89.94 (161) |
| Injectables Method | 20.11 (36) | 79.89 (143) |
| Female Sterilization Method | 16.76 (30) | 83.24 (149) |
Distribution of respondents by knowledge of natural family planning.
| Types of Natural Family Planning Methods | Frequency and Percentage of Responses | |
|---|---|---|
| Calendar Rhythm Method | 35.20 (63) | 64.80 (116) |
| Cervical Mucus Method | 18.44 (33) | 81.56 (146) |
| Abstinence Method | 38.66 (71) | 60.34 (108) |
| Withdrawal Method | 41.34 (740 | 58.66 (105) |
| Basal Body Temperature Method | 16.20 (29) | 83.80 (150) |
| Sympto-thermal Method | 8.94 (16) | 91.06 (163) |
Distribution of respondents by ever used of contraceptive methods.
| Types of natural family planning methods | Frequency and percentage of responses | |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |
| Lactational Amenorrhoea Method | 4.5 (8) | 95.4 (171) |
| Intrauterine Device Method | 8.4 (15) | 91.6 (164) |
| Condom Method | 22.3 (35) | 77.71 (122) |
| Combined Oral Contraceptives Method | 6.15 (110) | 93.85 (168) |
| Female Barrier Method | 2.79 (50) | 97.21 (1740 |
| Vasectomy Method | 1.12 (20) | 98.88 (177) |
| Tubal Ligation Method | 2.79 (5) | 97.21 (174) |
| Progestin-only Oral Contraceptive Method | 2.23 (4) | 97.77 (175) |
| Norplant Implants Method | 1.12 (20 | 98.88 (177) |
| Injectables Method | 6.70 (12) | 6.70 (167) |
| Female Sterilization Method | 2.23 (40 | 97.77 (175) |
Distribution of respondents by use of natural family planning methods.
| Types of Natural Family Planning Methods | Frequency and Percentage of Responses | |
|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | |
| Calendar Rhythm Method | 25.70 (46) | 74.30 (133) |
| Cervical Mucus Method | 10.61 (19) | 89.39 (160) |
| Abstinence Method | 28.49 (51) | 71.51 (128) |
| Withdrawal Method | 26.26 (47) | 73.74 (132) |
| Basal Body Temperature Method | 6.15 (9110) | 93.85 (168) |
| Sympto-thermal Method | 2.23 (4) | 97.77 (175) |