Literature DB >> 22958664

Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy.

Lauren N Lessard1, Deborah Karasek, Sandi Ma, Philip Darney, Julianna Deardorff, Maureen Lahiff, Dan Grossman, Diana Greene Foster.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Available contraceptives are not meeting many women's needs, as is evident by high levels of typical-use failure, method switching and discontinuation. To improve women's satisfaction with contraceptive methods, determining what features they prefer and how these preferences are satisfied by available methods and methods under development is crucial.
METHODS: The importance of 18 contraceptive method features was rated by 574 women seeking abortions--a group at high risk of having unprotected intercourse and unintended pregnancies--at six clinics across the United States in 2010. For each available and potential method, the number of features present was assessed, and the percentage of these that were "extremely important" to women was calculated.
RESULTS: The three contraceptive features deemed extremely important by the largest proportions of women were effectiveness (84%), lack of side effects (78%) and affordability (76%). For 91% of women, no method had all of the features they thought were extremely important. The ring and the sponge had the highest percentage of features that women deemed extremely important (67% each). Some streamlined modes of access and new contraceptive technologies have the potential to satisfy women's preferences. For example, an over-the-counter pill would have 71% of extremely important features, and an over-the-counter pericoital pill, 68%; currently available prescription pills have 60%.
CONCLUSION: The contraceptive features women want are largely absent from currently available methods. Developing and promoting methods that are more aligned with women's preferences presumably could help increase satisfaction and thereby encourage consistent and effective use.
Copyright © 2012 by the Guttmacher Institute.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22958664     DOI: 10.1363/4419412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  37 in total

1.  The role of contraceptive attributes in women's contraceptive decision making.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Mary C Politi; Jeffrey F Peipert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 2.  Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Colleen Krajewski; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.190

3.  Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.

Authors:  Christine Dehlendorf; Kevin Grumbach; Julie A Schmittdiel; Jody Steinauer
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Racial/ethnic differences in contraceptive preferences, beliefs, and self-efficacy among women veterans.

Authors:  Lisa S Callegari; Xinhua Zhao; Eleanor Bimla Schwarz; Elian Rosenfeld; Maria K Mor; Sonya Borrero
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  The Sexual Acceptability of Contraception: Reviewing the Literature and Building a New Concept.

Authors:  Jenny A Higgins; Nicole K Smith
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2016-03-08

6.  Factors associated with young adults' pregnancy likelihood.

Authors:  Melanie L Kornides; Panagiota Kitsantas; Lisa L Lindley; Huichuan Wu
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Evaluation of a computerized contraceptive decision aid: A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Tessa Madden; Jessica Holttum; Ragini Maddipati; Gina M Secura; Robert F Nease; Jeffrey F Peipert; Mary C Politi
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 3.375

8.  Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Liza Fuentes; Amy Allina
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-05-23

9.  Talking about male body-based contraceptives: The counseling visit and the feminization of contraception.

Authors:  Katrina Kimport
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 10.  The creeping Pearl: Why has the rate of contraceptive failure increased in clinical trials of combined hormonal contraceptive pills?

Authors:  James Trussell; David Portman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 3.375

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.