Literature DB >> 33661435

CTA-Based Non-invasive Estimation of Pressure Gradients Across a CoA: a Validation Against Cardiac Catheterisation.

Mingzi Zhang1, Jinlong Liu2,3,4, Haibo Zhang2, David I Verrelli5,6, Qian Wang7, Liwei Hu7, Yujie Li1, Makoto Ohta1, Jinfen Liu8,9, Xi Zhao10.   

Abstract

Non-invasive estimation of pressure gradients across a coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can reduce the need for diagnostic cardiac catheterisation. We aimed to validate two novel computational strategies-target-value approaching (TVA) and target-value fixing (TVF)-together with unrefined Doppler estimates, and to compare their diagnostic performance in identifying critical pressure drops for 40 patients. Compared to catheterisation, no statistically significant difference was demonstrated with TVA (P = 0.086), in contrast to TVF (P = 0.005) and unrefined Doppler echocardiography (P < 0.001). TVA manifested the strongest correlation with catheterisation (r = 0.93), compared to TVF (r = 0.83) and echocardiography (r = 0.67) (all P < 0.001). In discriminating pressure gradients greater than 20 mmHg, TVA, TVF, and echocardiography had respective sensitivities of 0.92, 0.88, and 0.80; specificities of 0.93, 0.80, and 0.73; and AUCs of 0.96, 0.89, and 0.80. The TVA strategy may serve as an effective and easily implemented approach to be used in clinical management of patients with CoA. Graphical Abstract Central illustration. Pressure gradients estimated using Doppler echocardiography and two novel computational strategies (TVA and TVF) were compared with cardiac catheterisation for 40 patients. TVA and TVF utilised the CTA images to obtain the CoA anatomy and Doppler echocardiography velocimetry to obtain velocity data for the assignment of CFD boundary conditions.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CTA; Cardiac catheterisation; Coarctation of the aorta; Computational fluid dynamics; Non-invasive estimation; Pressure gradient

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33661435     DOI: 10.1007/s12265-020-10092-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res        ISSN: 1937-5387            Impact factor:   4.132


  25 in total

Review 1.  Hemodynamics in the cardiac catheterization laboratory of the 21st century.

Authors:  Rick A Nishimura; Blase A Carabello
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010).

Authors:  Helmut Baumgartner; Philipp Bonhoeffer; Natasja M S De Groot; Fokko de Haan; John Erik Deanfield; Nazzareno Galie; Michael A Gatzoulis; Christa Gohlke-Baerwolf; Harald Kaemmerer; Philip Kilner; Folkert Meijboom; Barbara J M Mulder; Erwin Oechslin; Jose M Oliver; Alain Serraf; Andras Szatmari; Erik Thaulow; Pascal R Vouhe; Edmond Walma
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 29.983

3.  Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Timothy F Feltes; Emile Bacha; Robert H Beekman; John P Cheatham; Jeffrey A Feinstein; Antoinette S Gomes; Ziyad M Hijazi; Frank F Ing; Michael de Moor; W Robert Morrow; Charles E Mullins; Kathryn A Taubert; Evan M Zahn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients.

Authors:  Jelena Bock; Alex Frydrychowicz; Ramona Lorenz; Daniel Hirtler; Alex J Barker; Kevin M Johnson; Raoul Arnold; Hans Burkhardt; Juergen Hennig; Michael Markl
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Comparison of invasive and non-invasive pressure gradients in aortic arch obstruction.

Authors:  Bethany L Wisotzkey; Christoph P Hornik; Amanda S Green; Piers C A Barker
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.093

6.  Uncertainty Quantification for Non-invasive Assessment of Pressure Drop Across a Coarctation of the Aorta Using CFD.

Authors:  Jan Brüning; Florian Hellmeier; Pavlo Yevtushenko; Titus Kühne; Leonid Goubergrits
Journal:  Cardiovasc Eng Technol       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 2.495

7.  Aortic arch recoarctation after the Norwood stage I palliation: the comparative accuracy of blood pressure cuff and echocardiographic Doppler gradients in detecting significant obstruction.

Authors:  Priya Sekar; William L Border; Thomas R Kimball; Russel Hirsch; Peter B Manning; Philip R Khoury; Robert H Beekman Iii
Journal:  Congenit Heart Dis       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.007

8.  MRI-based computational fluid dynamics for diagnosis and treatment prediction: clinical validation study in patients with coarctation of aorta.

Authors:  Leonid Goubergrits; Eugenie Riesenkampff; Pavlo Yevtushenko; Jens Schaller; Ulrich Kertzscher; Anja Hennemuth; Felix Berger; Stephan Schubert; Titus Kuehne
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Accuracy and pitfalls of Doppler evaluation of the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation.

Authors:  G R Marx; H D Allen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  MRI-based computational hemodynamics in patients with aortic coarctation using the lattice Boltzmann methods: Clinical validation study.

Authors:  Hanieh Mirzaee; Thomas Henn; Mathias J Krause; Leonid Goubergrits; Christian Schumann; Mathias Neugebauer; Titus Kuehne; Tobias Preusser; Anja Hennemuth
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.