Literature DB >> 3711495

Accuracy and pitfalls of Doppler evaluation of the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation.

G R Marx, H D Allen.   

Abstract

Although the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation can usually be obtained by comparison of upper and lower limb blood pressures measured by sphygmomanometry, some patients may have upper or lower limb arterial compromise as a result of prior procedures or anomalous origin of the subclavian arteries, either of which may preclude accurate gradient measurement. To determine whether Doppler echocardiography could predict the pressure gradient, the Doppler method was used to predict transcoarctation gradients in 35 studies and the data were compared with the gradients measured at catheterization. Jet velocities were not adequately obtained by Doppler recording in three neonates with coarctation and patent ductus arteriosus, leaving 32 studies for analysis. The mean age of the study patients was 6 +/- 5.8 years. The mean Doppler-estimated gradient, calculated using only jet velocities distal to the obstruction (V2) in the modified Bernoulli equation, was 44 +/- 17 mm Hg, and the mean catheterization gradient was 36 +/- 21 mm Hg (p = NS; r = 0.91, SEE = 7.0 mm Hg; slope = 0.75, y = 17.3 mm Hg). The mean Doppler-estimated gradient using both the pre- and postcoarctation velocities (V1 and V2) in the modified Bernoulli equation (n = 26) was 36 +/- 20 mm Hg, and the mean catheterization gradient was 36 +/- 21 mm Hg (p = NS; r = 0.98, SEE = 4.2 mm Hg; slope = 0.91, y = 2.8 mm Hg). Doppler echocardiography closely estimated the pressure gradient in aortic coarctation, and estimation of the gradient improved when the velocities proximal as well as distal to the obstruction were included in the modified Bernoulli equation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3711495     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(86)80160-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  18 in total

Review 1.  [Echocardiographic evaluation in unoperated congenital heart disease in adults].

Authors:  A Geibel
Journal:  Herz       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography after surgical repair of coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  K C Chan; D F Dickinson; G A Wharton; J L Gibbs
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1992-08

Review 3.  Ultrasound and coarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  J L Gibbs
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-08

4.  Estimation of Doppler gradients at rest and during exercise in patients with recoarctation of the aorta.

Authors:  D Teien; H Wendel; S Holm; M Hallberg
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-03

Review 5.  Perioperative echocardiographic evaluation.

Authors:  R G Williams
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1989

6.  Continuous wave Doppler echocardiography and coarctation of the aorta: gradients and flow patterns in the assessment of severity.

Authors:  J S Carvalho; A N Redington; E A Shinebourne; M L Rigby; D Gibson
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1990-08

Review 7.  Quantitative applications of Doppler cardiography in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  S D Colan
Journal:  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Echocardiography in the diagnosis of thoracic aortic pathology.

Authors:  F D Tice; J Kisslo
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1993

9.  Juxtaductal aortic atresia masquerading as coarctation.

Authors:  O Onuzo; M Rigby; A Redington
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 1.655

10.  Significance of the Doppler-derived gradient across a residual aortic coarctation.

Authors:  A W Aldousany; T G DiSessa; B S Alpert; S E Birnbaum; E S Willey
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.