Literature DB >> 21437978

In vivo noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping in the human aorta: phantom comparison and application in healthy volunteers and patients.

Jelena Bock1, Alex Frydrychowicz, Ramona Lorenz, Daniel Hirtler, Alex J Barker, Kevin M Johnson, Raoul Arnold, Hans Burkhardt, Juergen Hennig, Michael Markl.   

Abstract

In this work, we present a systematic phantom comparison and clinical application of noninvasive pressure difference mapping in the human aorta based on time-resolved 3D phase contrast data. Relative pressure differences were calculated based on integration and iterative refinement of pressure gradients derived from MR-based three-directional velocity vector fields (flow-sensitive 4D MRI with spatial/temporal resolution ∼ 2.1 mm(3)/40 ms) using the Navier-Stokes equation. After in vitro study using a stenosis phantom, time-resolved 3D pressure gradients were systematically evaluated in the thoracic aorta in a group of 12 healthy subjects and 6 patients after repair for aortic coarctation. Results from the phantom study showed good agreement with expected values and standard methods (Bernoulli). Data of healthy subjects showed good intersubject consistency and good agreement with the literature. In patients, pressure waveforms showed elevated peak values. Pressure gradients across the stenosis were compared with reference measurements from Doppler ultrasound. The MRI findings demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.96, P < 0.05) but moderate underestimation (14.7% ± 15.5%) compared with ultrasound when the maximum pressure difference for all possible paths connecting proximal and distal locations of the stenosis were used. This study demonstrates the potential of the applied approach to derive additional quantitative information such as pressure gradients from time-resolved 3D phase contrast MRI.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21437978     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22907

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  36 in total

1.  In vivo and in vitro validation of aortic flow quantification by time-resolved three-dimensional velocity-encoded MRI.

Authors:  Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley; Matthias Müller-Eschner; Sasan Partovi; Philipp Geisbüsch; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 2.  Four-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging in cirrhosis.

Authors:  Zoran Stankovic
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  4-D flow magnetic-resonance-imaging-derived energetic biomarkers are abnormal in children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot and associated with disease severity.

Authors:  Joshua D Robinson; Michael J Rose; Maria Joh; Kelly Jarvis; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker; Cynthia K Rigsby; Michael Markl
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-12-01

4.  Assessment of uterine artery geometry and hemodynamics in human pregnancy with 4d flow mri and its correlation with doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Eileen Hwuang; Marta Vidorreta; Nadav Schwartz; Brianna F Moon; Kirpal Kochar; Matthew Dylan Tisdall; John A Detre; Walter R T Witschey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Intracardiac flow visualization: current status and future directions.

Authors:  Daniel Rodriguez Muñoz; Michael Markl; José Luis Moya Mur; Alex Barker; Covadonga Fernández-Golfín; Patrizio Lancellotti; José Luis Zamorano Gómez
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Noninvasive 4D pressure difference mapping derived from 4D flow MRI in patients with repaired aortic coarctation: comparison with young healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Fabian Rengier; Michael Delles; Joachim Eichhorn; Yoo-Jin Azad; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Julia Ley-Zaporozhan; Rüdiger Dillmann; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Roland Unterhinninghofen; Sebastian Ley
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  Reduction of aberrant aortic haemodynamics following aortic root replacement with a mechanical valved conduit.

Authors:  Eric J Keller; S Chris Malaisrie; Jane Kruse; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Jeremy D Collins
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-30

Review 8.  4D flow imaging: current status to future clinical applications.

Authors:  Michael Markl; Susanne Schnell; Alex J Barker
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Volumetric velocity measurements in restricted geometries using spiral sampling: a phantom study.

Authors:  Anders Nilsson; Johan Revstedt; Einar Heiberg; Freddy Ståhlberg; Karin Markenroth Bloch
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 10.  Bicuspid aortic valve related aortopathy.

Authors:  Sina Stock; Salah A Mohamed; Hans-Hinrich Sievers
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-08-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.