Literature DB >> 33660034

Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) in staging and re-staging of multiple myeloma.

Davide Ippolito1,2, Teresa Giandola1,2, Cesare Maino3,4, Anna Pecorelli1,2, Maria Ragusi1,2, Marco Porta1,2, Davide Gandola1,2, Cammillo Talei Franzesi1,2, Sandro Sironi2,5.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to evaluate the prognostic features of multiple myeloma (MM) using whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT). One hundred three patients with biopsy-proven MM who underwent WBLDCT were retrospectively enrolled. The evolution of osteolytic lesions overtime was performed by measuring the maximum axial diameter at the baseline (T0) and the end of follow-up (Te), by using a cut-off value of 10 mm. The location and dimension of up to three lesions were registered. The time-to-fracture (TTF) was recorded. Sixty-three percent of patients presented a focal pattern, 22% a diffuse pattern, and 15% a combined one. Seventy-two percent of patients with lesions ≤ 10 mm presented stability, 27% a dimensional increase, and 1% a decrease. Patients with lesions >10 mm showed a statistically significant difference regarding the mean difference of axial diameter between T0 and Te (p = 0.015). Patients with lesions >10 mm showed an odds ratio (OR) of 29.8 (95%CIs 3.8-230.5) to develop at least one fracture. Mean TTF was significantly lower in patients with lesions >10 mm in comparison with lesions ≤ 10 mm (9 ± 3 vs 23 ± 7 months, respectively, p = 0.011). WBLDCT represents a reliable imaging-based tool for proper management of MM patients, showing that diffuse form or small lytic lesions may deserve a less frequent follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hematologic neoplasms; Multidetector computed tomography; Multiple myeloma; Osteolysis; Radiation dosage

Year:  2021        PMID: 33660034     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-021-04468-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  13 in total

Review 1.  Multiple myeloma: 2011 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management.

Authors:  S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 10.047

2.  Converting dose-length product to effective dose at CT.

Authors:  Walter Huda; Kent M Ogden; Mohammad R Khorasani
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of whole-body 64-slice multidetector computed tomography and conventional radiography in staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Patric Kröpil; Roland Fenk; Lars B Fritz; Dirk Blondin; Guido Kobbe; Ulrich Mödder; Mathias Cohnen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Imaging in multiple myeloma: How? When?

Authors:  Elena Zamagni; Paola Tacchetti; Michele Cavo
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Claus D Claussen; Ulrike Bross-Bach; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Trabold; Martin Heuschmid; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

Review 6.  Whole-Body Imaging of Multiple Myeloma: Diagnostic Criteria.

Authors:  Alípio G Ormond Filho; Bruno C Carneiro; Daniel Pastore; Igor P Silva; Sâmia R Yamashita; Flávio D Consolo; Vânia T M Hungria; Alex F Sandes; Edgar G Rizzatti; Marcelo A C Nico
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 7.  Myeloma bone disease: pathophysiology and management.

Authors:  E Terpos; M-A Dimopoulos
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Sensitivity of whole-body CT and MRI versus projection radiography in the detection of osteolyses in patients with monoclonal plasma cell disease.

Authors:  Maya B Wolf; Fritz Murray; Kerstin Kilk; Jens Hillengass; Stefan Delorme; Christiane Heiss; Kai Neben; Hartmut Goldschmidt; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Marc-André Weber
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 3.528

9.  Guidelines for the use of imaging in the management of patients with myeloma.

Authors:  Andrew Chantry; Majid Kazmi; Sally Barrington; Vicky Goh; Nicola Mulholland; Matthew Streetly; Maggie Lai; Guy Pratt
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 6.998

10.  Recommendations for acquisition, interpretation and reporting of whole body low dose CT in patients with multiple myeloma and other plasma cell disorders: a report of the IMWG Bone Working Group.

Authors:  Lia A Moulopoulos; Vassilis Koutoulidis; Jens Hillengass; Elena Zamagni; Jesus D Aquerreta; Charles L Roche; Suzanne Lentzsch; Philippe Moreau; Michele Cavo; Jesus San Miguel; Meletios A Dimopoulos; S Vincent Rajkumar; Brian G M Durie; Evangelos Terpos; Stefan Delorme
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 11.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.