Literature DB >> 30587527

Imaging in multiple myeloma: How? When?

Elena Zamagni1, Paola Tacchetti1, Michele Cavo1.   

Abstract

Bone disease is the most frequent feature of multiple myeloma (MM) and represents a marker of end-organ damage; it is used to establish the diagnosis and to dictate the immediate need for therapy. For this reason, imaging plays a significant role in the management of MM patients. Although conventional radiography has traditionally been the standard imaging modality, its low sensitivity in detecting osteolytic lesions and inability to evaluate response to therapy has called for the use of more sophisticated techniques, such as whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT), whole-body magnetic resonance imaging, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). In this review, the advantages, indications of use, and applications of the 3 techniques in the management of patients with MM in different settings will be discussed. The European Myeloma Network and the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines have recommended WBLDCT as the imaging modality of choice for the initial assessment of MM-related lytic bone lesions. Magnetic resonance imaging is the gold-standard imaging modality for detection of bone marrow involvement, whereas PET/CT provides valuable prognostic data and is the preferred technique for assessment of response to therapy. Standardization of most of the techniques is ongoing.
© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30587527     DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-08-825356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  20 in total

1.  ImmunoPET imaging of multiple myeloma with [68Ga]Ga-NOTA-Nb1053.

Authors:  Cheng Wang; Yumei Chen; Yun Nan Hou; Qiufang Liu; Di Zhang; Haitao Zhao; You Zhang; Shuxian An; Lianghua Li; Jian Hou; Gang Huang; Jianjun Liu; Yong Juan Zhao; Weijun Wei
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  A preliminary study using spinal MRI-based radiomics to predict high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Jianfang Liu; Chunjie Wang; Wei Guo; Piaoe Zeng; Yan Liu; Ning Lang; Huishu Yuan
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Whole-body low-dose computed tomography (WBLDCT) in staging and re-staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Davide Ippolito; Teresa Giandola; Cesare Maino; Anna Pecorelli; Maria Ragusi; Marco Porta; Davide Gandola; Cammillo Talei Franzesi; Sandro Sironi
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 3.673

Review 4.  Progress of modern imaging modalities in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Toshiki Terao; Kosei Matsue
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.490

5.  Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography at diagnosis in untreated multiple myeloma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Li; Linhui Hu; Alice Charwudzi; Weiwei Zhu; Ye Meng; Zhimin Zhai
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2022-01-09       Impact factor: 3.984

Review 6.  Single-cell profiling of tumour evolution in multiple myeloma - opportunities for precision medicine.

Authors:  Ankit K Dutta; Jean-Baptiste Alberge; Romanos Sklavenitis-Pistofidis; Elizabeth D Lightbody; Gad Getz; Irene M Ghobrial
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 65.011

7.  Role of whole-body MRI for treatment response assessment in multiple myeloma: comparison between clinical response and imaging response.

Authors:  Ho Young Park; Kyung Won Kim; Min A Yoon; Min Hee Lee; Eun Jin Chae; Jeong Hyun Lee; Hye Won Chung; Dok Hyun Yoon
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2020-01-30       Impact factor: 3.909

8.  Prognostic impact of posttransplant FDG PET/CT scan in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Marcella Kaddoura; David Dingli; Francis K Buadi; Martha Q Lacy; Morie A Gertz; Angela Dispenzieri; Prashant Kapoor; Lisa Hwa; Amie Fonder; Miriam Hobbs; Suzanne Hayman; John Lust; Nelson Leung; Ronald S Go; Yi Lin; Wilson Gonsalves; Taxiarchis Kourelis; Rahma Warsame; Robert A Kyle; Stephen M Broski; Vincent Rajkumar; Shaji Kumar
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2021-07-13

9.  Identification of patients at high risk of secondary extramedullary multiple myeloma development.

Authors:  Martin Stork; Sabina Sevcikova; Jiri Minarik; Petra Krhovska; Jakub Radocha; Lenka Pospisilova; Lucie Brozova; Jiri Jarkovsky; Ivan Spicka; Jan Straub; Petr Pavlicek; Alexandra Jungova; Tomas Jelinek; Viera Sandecka; Vladimir Maisnar; Roman Hajek; Ludek Pour
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2021-11-02       Impact factor: 8.615

Review 10.  Liquid biopsies for multiple myeloma in a time of precision medicine.

Authors:  Bruna Ferreira; Joana Caetano; Filipa Barahona; Raquel Lopes; Emilie Carneiro; Bruno Costa-Silva; Cristina João
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.