Literature DB >> 33658587

Cell-free DNA concentration and fragment size as a biomarker for prostate cancer.

Emmalyn Chen1, Clinton L Cario1, Lancelote Leong1, Karen Lopez2, César P Márquez3,4, Carissa Chu2, Patricia S Li2, Erica Oropeza2, Imelda Tenggara2, Janet Cowan2, Jeffry P Simko2,5, June M Chan1,2, Terence Friedlander3, Alexander W Wyatt6, Rahul Aggarwal3, Pamela L Paris2, Peter R Carroll2, Felix Feng2,7, John S Witte8,9.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most commonly diagnosed neoplasm in American men. Although existing biomarkers may detect localized prostate cancer, additional strategies are necessary for improving detection and identifying aggressive disease that may require further intervention. One promising, minimally invasive biomarker is cell-free DNA (cfDNA), which consist of short DNA fragments released into circulation by dying or lysed cells that may reflect underlying cancer. Here we investigated whether differences in cfDNA concentration and cfDNA fragment size could improve the sensitivity for detecting more advanced and aggressive prostate cancer. This study included 268 individuals: 34 healthy controls, 112 men with localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP), and 122 men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Plasma cfDNA concentration and fragment size were quantified with the Qubit 3.0 and the 2100 Bioanalyzer. The potential relationship between cfDNA concentration or fragment size and localized or mCRPC prostate cancer was evaluated with descriptive statistics, logistic regression, and area under the curve analysis with cross-validation. Plasma cfDNA concentrations were elevated in mCRPC patients in comparison to localized disease (OR5ng/mL = 1.34, P = 0.027) or to being a control (OR5ng/mL = 1.69, P = 0.034). Decreased average fragment size was associated with an increased risk of localized disease compared to controls (OR5bp = 0.77, P = 0.0008). This study suggests that while cfDNA concentration can identify mCRPC patients, it is unable to distinguish between healthy individuals and patients with localized prostate cancer. In addition to PSA, average cfDNA fragment size may be an alternative that can differentiate between healthy individuals and those with localized disease, but the low sensitivity and specificity results in an imperfect diagnostic marker. While quantification of cfDNA may provide a quick, cost-effective approach to help guide treatment decisions in advanced disease, its use is limited in the setting of localized prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33658587      PMCID: PMC7930042          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84507-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  32 in total

1.  Changes in concentration of DNA in serum and plasma during storage of blood samples.

Authors:  Monika Jung; Silke Klotzek; Michaela Lewandowski; Michael Fleischhacker; Klaus Jung
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  P MANDEL; P METAIS
Journal:  C R Seances Soc Biol Fil       Date:  1948-02

3.  Guidelines for the Preanalytical Conditions for Analyzing Circulating Cell-Free DNA.

Authors:  Romain Meddeb; Ekaterina Pisareva; Alain R Thierry
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2019-02-21       Impact factor: 8.327

4.  Quantitation of genomic DNA in plasma and serum samples: higher concentrations of genomic DNA found in serum than in plasma.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Montalvo; V Chrebtow; M P Busch
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Harmonizing Cell-Free DNA Collection and Processing Practices through Evidence-Based Guidance.

Authors:  Sarah R Greytak; Kelly B Engel; Sonya Parpart-Li; Muhammed Murtaza; Abel J Bronkhorst; Mark D Pertile; Helen M Moore
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Circulating free DNA concentration is an independent prognostic biomarker in lung cancer.

Authors:  Claire Tissot; Anne-Claire Toffart; Stéphanie Villar; Pierre-Jean Souquet; Patrick Merle; Denis Moro-Sibilot; Maurice Pérol; Jiri Zavadil; Christian Brambilla; Magali Olivier; Sébastien Couraud
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Plasma cell-free DNA and its DNA integrity as biomarker to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with increased serum prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Jiang Feng; Feng Gang; Xiao Li; Tang Jin; Huang Houbao; Cao Yu; Li Guorong
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-19       Impact factor: 2.370

8.  Increased cell-free DNA in plasma of patients with metastatic spread in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Klaus Jung; Carsten Stephan; Michaela Lewandowski; Silke Klotzek; Monika Jung; Glen Kristiansen; Michael Lein; Stefan A Loening; Dietmar Schnorr
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2004-03-18       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Towards standardisation of cell-free DNA measurement in plasma: controls for extraction efficiency, fragment size bias and quantification.

Authors:  Alison S Devonshire; Alexandra S Whale; Alice Gutteridge; Gerwyn Jones; Simon Cowen; Carole A Foy; Jim F Huggett
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.142

10.  Fragment size and level of cell-free DNA provide prognostic information in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Morten Lapin; Satu Oltedal; Kjersti Tjensvoll; Tove Buhl; Rune Smaaland; Herish Garresori; Milind Javle; Nils Idar Glenjen; Bente Kristin Abelseth; Bjørnar Gilje; Oddmund Nordgård
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 5.531

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  A practical guide to chimerism analysis: Review of the literature and testing practices worldwide.

Authors:  Amanda G Blouin; Fei Ye; Jenifer Williams; Medhat Askar
Journal:  Hum Immunol       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 2.211

Review 2.  Liquid Biopsy in Prostate Cancer Management-Current Challenges and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Felice Crocetto; Gianluca Russo; Erika Di Zazzo; Pasquale Pisapia; Benito Fabio Mirto; Alessandro Palmieri; Francesco Pepe; Claudio Bellevicine; Alessandro Russo; Evelina La Civita; Daniela Terracciano; Umberto Malapelle; Giancarlo Troncone; Biagio Barone
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Cancer-cell-derived cell-free DNA can predict distant metastasis earlier in pancreatic cancer: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Chien-Jui Huang; Wen-Yen Huang; Chien-Yu Chen; Ying-Jui Chao; Nai-Jung Chiang; Yan-Shen Shan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.485

Review 4.  Liquid Biopsy Based Circulating Biomarkers in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Eshwari Dathathri; Khrystany T Isebia; Fikri Abali; Martijn P Lolkema; John W M Martens; Leon W M M Terstappen; Ruchi Bansal
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Efficient Small Extracellular Vesicles (EV) Isolation Method and Evaluation of EV-Associated DNA Role in Cell-Cell Communication in Cancer.

Authors:  Venkatesh Kumar Chetty; Jamal Ghanam; Srishti Anchan; Katarina Reinhardt; Alexandra Brenzel; Márton Gelléri; Christoph Cremer; Elena Grueso-Navarro; Markus Schneider; Nils von Neuhoff; Dirk Reinhardt; Jadwiga Jablonska; Irina Nazarenko; Basant Kumar Thakur
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 6.575

6.  Identification of tumor tissue-derived DNA methylation biomarkers for the detection and therapy response evaluation of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer in liquid biopsies.

Authors:  Thomas Dillinger; Raheleh Sheibani-Tezerji; Walter Pulverer; Ines Stelzer; Melanie R Hassler; Janine Scheibelreiter; Carlos Uziel Pérez Malla; Madeleine Kuroll; Sandra Domazet; Elisa Redl; Sarah Ely; Stefanie Brezina; Andreas Tiefenbacher; Katharina Rebhan; Nicolai Hübner; Bernhard Grubmüller; Markus Mitterhauser; Marcus Hacker; Andreas Weinhaeusel; Judit Simon; Markus Zeitlinger; Andrea Gsur; Gero Kramer; Shahrokh F Shariat; Lukas Kenner; Gerda Egger
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 7.  Liquid Biopsy-Based Biosensors for MRD Detection and Treatment Monitoring in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC).

Authors:  Parvaneh Sardarabadi; Amir Asri Kojabad; Davod Jafari; Cheng-Hsien Liu
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-15

8.  Clinical Validity of Circulating Tumor DNA as Prognostic and Predictive Marker for Personalized Colorectal Cancer Patient Management.

Authors:  Ariane Hallermayr; Verena Steinke-Lange; Holger Vogelsang; Markus Rentsch; Maike de Wit; Christopher Haberl; Elke Holinski-Feder; Julia M A Pickl
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Circulating Cell-Free DNA Profiling Predicts the Therapeutic Outcome in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Combination Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Takayuki Matsumae; Takahiro Kodama; Yuta Myojin; Kazuki Maesaka; Ryotaro Sakamori; Ayako Takuwa; Keiko Oku; Daisuke Motooka; Yoshiyuki Sawai; Masahide Oshita; Tasuku Nakabori; Kazuyoshi Ohkawa; Masanori Miyazaki; Satoshi Tanaka; Eiji Mita; Seiichi Tawara; Takayuki Yakushijin; Yasutoshi Nozaki; Hideki Hagiwara; Yuki Tahata; Ryoko Yamada; Hayato Hikita; Tomohide Tatsumi; Tetsuo Takehara
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.575

10.  Comprehensive Approach to Distinguish Patients with Solid Tumors from Healthy Controls by Combining Androgen Receptor Mutation p.H875Y with Cell-Free DNA Methylation and Circulating miRNAs.

Authors:  Elena Tomeva; Olivier J Switzeny; Clemens Heitzinger; Berit Hippe; Alexander G Haslberger
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.