Literature DB >> 30315636

Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lithotripsy with or without "Moses technology": How are they different?

Etienne X Keller1,2,3, Vincent de Coninck1,2,4, Marie Audouin1,2, Steeve Doizi1,2, Dominique Bazin5,6, Michel Daudon7,8,9, Olivier Traxer1,2.   

Abstract

Urinary stones can be readily disintegrated by Holmium:YAG laser (Holmium laser lithotripsy), resulting in a mixture of small stone dust particles, which will spontaneously evacuate with urine and larger residual fragments (RF) requiring mechanical retrieval. Differences between fragments and dust have not been well characterized. Also, it remains unknown how the recently introduced "Moses technology" may alter stone disintegration products. Three complementary analytical techniques have been used in this study to offer an in-depth characterization of disintegration products after in vitro Holmium laser lithotripsy: stereoscopic microscopy, scanning electron microscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Dust was separated from fragments based on its floating ability in saline irrigation. Depending on initial crystalline constituents, stone dust either conserved attributes found in larger RFs or showed changes in crystalline organization. These included conversion of calcium oxalate dihydrate towards calcium oxalate monohydrate, changes in carbapatite spectra towards an amorphous phase, changes of magnesium ammonium phosphate towards a differing amorphous and crystalline phase and the appearance of hydroxyapatite on brushite fragments. Comparatively, "Moses technology" produced more pronounced changes. These findings provide new insights suggesting a photothermal effect occurring in Holmium laser lithotripsy. Figure: Appearance of hydroxyapatite hexagons on stone dust collected after Holmium laser lithotripsy of a brushite stone using "Moses technology."
© 2018 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy; Moses effect; holmium laser; lithotripsy; residual fragments; scanning electron microscopy; stone dust; urinary stone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30315636     DOI: 10.1002/jbio.201800227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biophotonics        ISSN: 1864-063X            Impact factor:   3.207


  10 in total

1.  Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types?

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Steeve Doizi; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-05-03       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  New Generation Pulse Modulation in Holmium:YAG Lasers: A Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Antoni Sánchez-Puy; Alejandra Bravo-Balado; Pietro Diana; Michael Baboudjian; Alberto Piana; Irene Girón; Andrés K Kanashiro; Oriol Angerri; Pablo Contreras; Brian H Eisner; Josep Balañà; Francisco M Sánchez-Martín; Félix Millán; Joan Palou; Esteban Emiliani
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

3.  What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation.

Authors:  Etienne Xavier Keller; Vincent De Coninck; Steeve Doizi; Michel Daudon; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with SuperPulsed Thulium-fiber laser.

Authors:  Dmitry Korolev; Gagik Akopyan; Dmitry Tsarichenko; Anastasia Shpikina; Stanislav Ali; Denis Chinenov; Mariela Corrales; Mark Taratkin; Olivier Traxer; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 5.  Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser.

Authors:  Olivier Traxer; Etienne Xavier Keller
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Retrograde intrarenal surgery: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Takaaki Inoue; Shinsuke Okada; Shuzo Hamamoto; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2021-03

7.  Laser Fiber Displacement Velocity during Tm-Fiber and Ho:YAG Laser Lithotripsy: Introducing the Concept of Optimal Displacement Velocity.

Authors:  Frederic Panthier; Thibault Germain; Cyril Gorny; Laurent Berthe; Steeve Doizi; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-29       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  The art of shockwave lithotripsy is an endangered species and is worth saving: the perspective of the European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urology (YAU) Urolithiasis group.

Authors:  Patrick Juliebø-Jones; Etienne Xavier Keller; Thomas Tailly; Mathias Sørstrand Æsøy; Francesco Esperto; Ioannis Mykoniatis; Vincent de Coninck; Amelia Pietropaolo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  Moses and Moses 2.0 for Laser Lithotripsy: Expectations vs. Reality.

Authors:  Mariela Corrales; Alba Sierra; Olivier Traxer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

10.  Double-Blinded Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Regular and Moses Modes of Holmium Laser Lithotripsy.

Authors:  Ahmed Ibrahim; Mostafa M Elhilali; Nader Fahmy; Serge Carrier; Sero Andonian
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 2.942

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.