Literature DB >> 33654120

Accuracy of new Corvis ST parameters for detecting subclinical and clinical keratoconus eyes in a Chinese population.

Shengwei Ren1, Liyan Xu1, Qi Fan1, Yuwei Gu1, Kaili Yang2.   

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the values of new corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST) parameters in normal, subclinical keratoconus (SKC) and keratoconus (KC) eyes, and evaluate the diagnostic ability to distinguish SKC and KC eyes from normal eyes. One-hundred normal, 100 SKC and 100 KC eyes were included in the study. Corvis ST parameters containing dynamic corneal response parameters were measured by one ophthalmologist. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic ability of new Corvis ST parameters. The new Corvis ST parameters in KC eyes were different from those in the control and SKC eyes after adjusting for IOP and CCT, and stiffness parameter at the first applanation (SP-A1) and Corvis biomechanical index (CBI) were significantly different between the control and SKC eyes (all P < 0.05). The parameter with the highest diagnostic efficiency was SP-A1 (Youden index = 0.40, AUC = 0.753), followed by CBI (Youden index = 0.38, AUC = 0.703), and Integrated Radius (Youden index = 0.33, AUC = 0.668) in diagnosing SKC from control eyes. New Corvis ST parameters in SKC eyes were significantly different from normal control and KC eyes, and could be considered to distinguish SKC and KC eyes from normal eyes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33654120      PMCID: PMC7925657          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84370-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  40 in total

Review 1.  A review of keratoconus: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and genetics.

Authors:  Veronica Mas Tur; Cheryl MacGregor; Rakesh Jayaswal; David O'Brart; Nicholas Maycock
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 6.048

2.  Comparison of corneal dynamic parameters and tomographic measurements using Scheimpflug imaging in keratoconus.

Authors:  Tommy Cy Chan; Yu Meng Wang; Marco Yu; Vishal Jhanji
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas.

Authors:  T T Andreassen; A H Simonsen; H Oxlund
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Detection of Keratoconus With a New Biomechanical Index.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Renato Ambrósio; Ahmed Elsheikh; Cynthia J Roberts; Bernardo Lopes; Emanuela Morenghi; Claudio Azzolini; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Changes in Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Shunsuke Nakakura; Yoshitaka Nakao; Yuri Fujino; Masato Matsuura; Hiroshi Murata; Yoshiaki Kiuchi; Ryo Asaoka
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Longitudinal study of the normal eyes in unilateral keratoconus patients.

Authors:  Xiaohui Li; Yaron S Rabinowitz; Karim Rasheed; Huiying Yang
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 12.079

7.  Changes in the balance of the tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMPs)-1 and -3 may promote keratocyte apoptosis in keratoconus.

Authors:  Fiona J Matthews; Stuart D Cook; Mohammed A Majid; Andrew D Dick; Valerie A Smith
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 8.  Novel dynamic corneal response parameters in a practice use: a critical review.

Authors:  Magdalena Jędzierowska; Robert Koprowski
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 2.819

9.  Relationship Among Corneal Stiffness, Thickness, and Biomechanical Parameters Measured by Corvis ST, Pentacam and ORA in Keratoconus.

Authors:  Yu Zhao; Yang Shen; Zhipeng Yan; Mi Tian; Jing Zhao; Xingtao Zhou
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.566

10.  Assessment of Corneal Pachymetry Distribution and Morphologic Changes in Subclinical Keratoconus with Normal Biomechanics.

Authors:  Peng Song; Kaili Yang; Pei Li; Yu Liu; Dengfeng Liang; Shengwei Ren; Qingyan Zeng
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Relationship Between the Changes in the Corneal Biomechanical Properties and Changes in the Anterior Segment OCT Parameters Following Customized Corneal Cross-Linking.

Authors:  Tomoya Nishida; Takashi Kojima; Takahiro Kataoka; Naoki Isogai; Yoko Yoshida; Tomoaki Nakamura
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-09

2.  Detection ability of corneal biomechanical parameters for early diagnosis of ectasia.

Authors:  Mohammad-Reza Sedaghat; Hamed Momeni-Moghaddam; Javad Heravian; Atiyeh Ansari; Helia Shayanfar; Majid Moshirfar
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 4.456

3.  Effect of Mydriasis-Caused Intraocular Pressure Changes on Corneal Biomechanical Metrics.

Authors:  Yufeng Ye; Yi Li; Zehui Zhu; Anas Ziad Masoud Abu Said; Kevin Nguelemo Mayopa; Stephen Akiti; Chengyi Huang; Bernardo T Lopes; Ashkan Eliasy; Yuanyuan Miao; Junjie Wang; Xiaobo Zheng; Shihao Chen; Fangjun Bao; Ahmed Elsheikh
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-11-26

4.  Corneal Biomechanics Differences Between Chinese and Caucasian Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Robert Herber; Yan Wang; Fengju Zhang; Xingtao Zhou; Ji Bai; Keming Yu; Shihao Chen; Xuejun Fang; Frederik Raiskup; Paolo Vinciguerra
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-25

5.  Distribution of pediatric keratoconus by different age and gender groups.

Authors:  Kaili Yang; Yuwei Gu; Liyan Xu; Qi Fan; Meng Zhu; Qing Wang; Shanshan Yin; Bo Zhang; Chenjiu Pang; Shengwei Ren
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 3.569

6.  Independent and interactive effects of eye rubbing and atopy on keratoconus.

Authors:  Kaili Yang; Dan Li; Liyan Xu; Chenjiu Pang; Dongqing Zhao; Shengwei Ren
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 8.786

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.