Literature DB >> 33653094

Stabilizing responses to sideslip disturbances in Drosophila melanogaster are modulated by the density of moving elements on the ground.

Carlos Ruiz1, Jamie C Theobald1.   

Abstract

Stabilizing responses to sideslip disturbances are a critical part of the flight control system in flies. While strongly mediated by mechanoreception, much of the final response results from the wide-field motion detection system associated with vision. In order to be effective, these responses must match the disturbance they are aimed to correct. To do this, flies must estimate the velocity of the disturbance, although it is not known how they accomplish this task when presented with natural images or dot fields. The recent finding, that motion parallax in dot fields can modulate stabilizing responses only if perceived below the fly, raises the question of whether other image statistics are also processed differently between eye regions. One such parameter is the density of elements moving in translational optic flow. Depending on the habitat, there might be strong differences in the density of elements providing information about self-motion above and below the fly, which in turn could act as selective pressures tuning the visual system to process this parameter on a regional basis. By presenting laterally moving dot fields of different densities we found that, in Drosophila melanogaster, the amplitude of the stabilizing response is significantly affected by the number of elements in the field of view. Flies countersteer strongly within a relatively low and narrow range of element densities. But this effect is exclusive to the ventral region of the eye, and dorsal stimuli elicit an unaltered and stereotypical response regardless of the density of elements in the flow. This highlights local specialization of the eye and suggests the lower region may play a more critical role in translational flight stabilization.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drosophila melanogaster; dot field density; flight control; insect vision; optomotor response; regional optic flow

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33653094      PMCID: PMC8086981          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2020.0748

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  28 in total

1.  Motor output reflects the linear superposition of visual and olfactory inputs in Drosophila.

Authors:  Mark A Frye; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  The relevance of neural architecture to visual performance: phylogenetic conservation and variation in Dipteran visual systems.

Authors:  E K Buschbeck; N J Strausfeld
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1997-07-07       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Flight control in Drosophila by visual perception of motion.

Authors:  K G Götz
Journal:  Kybernetik       Date:  1968-06

4.  Spike Burst Coding of Translatory Optic Flow and Depth from Motion in the Fly Visual System.

Authors:  Kit D Longden; Martina Wicklein; Ben J Hardcastle; Stephen J Huston; Holger G Krapp
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Detecting visual motion: theory and models.

Authors:  A Borst; M Egelhaaf
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1993

6.  Fruit flies increase attention to their frontal visual field during fast forward optic flow.

Authors:  Nicholas Palermo; Jamie Theobald
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 7.  Celestial navigation in Drosophila.

Authors:  Timothy L Warren; Ysabel M Giraldo; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Processing of horizontal optic flow in three visual interneurons of the Drosophila brain.

Authors:  B Schnell; M Joesch; F Forstner; S V Raghu; H Otsuna; K Ito; A Borst; D F Reiff
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Spatial organization of visuomotor reflexes in Drosophila.

Authors:  Lance F Tammero; Mark A Frye; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  A visual horizon affects steering responses during flight in fruit flies.

Authors:  Jorge Caballero; Chantell Mazo; Ivan Rodriguez-Pinto; Jamie C Theobald
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  1 in total

1.  Stabilizing responses to sideslip disturbances in Drosophila melanogaster are modulated by the density of moving elements on the ground.

Authors:  Carlos Ruiz; Jamie C Theobald
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.703

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.