Literature DB >> 26232414

A visual horizon affects steering responses during flight in fruit flies.

Jorge Caballero1, Chantell Mazo1, Ivan Rodriguez-Pinto1, Jamie C Theobald2.   

Abstract

To navigate well through three-dimensional environments, animals must in some way gauge the distances to objects and features around them. Humans use a variety of visual cues to do this, but insects, with their small size and rigid eyes, are constrained to a more limited range of possible depth cues. For example, insects attend to relative image motion when they move, but cannot change the optical power of their eyes to estimate distance. On clear days, the horizon is one of the most salient visual features in nature, offering clues about orientation, altitude and, for humans, distance to objects. We set out to determine whether flying fruit flies treat moving features as farther off when they are near the horizon. Tethered flies respond strongly to moving images they perceive as close. We measured the strength of steering responses while independently varying the elevation of moving stimuli and the elevation of a virtual horizon. We found responses to vertical bars are increased by negative elevations of their bases relative to the horizon, closely correlated with the inverse of apparent distance. In other words, a bar that dips far below the horizon elicits a strong response, consistent with using the horizon as a depth cue. Wide-field motion also had an enhanced effect below the horizon, but this was only prevalent when flies were additionally motivated with hunger. These responses may help flies tune behaviors to nearby objects and features when they are too far off for motion parallax.
© 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depth cue; Flight control; Fly; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26232414     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.119313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  3 in total

1.  Small fruit flies sacrifice temporal acuity to maintain contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  John P Currea; Joshua L Smith; Jamie C Theobald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Stabilizing responses to sideslip disturbances in Drosophila melanogaster are modulated by the density of moving elements on the ground.

Authors:  Carlos Ruiz; Jamie C Theobald
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Acuity and summation strategies differ in vinegar and desert fruit flies.

Authors:  John P Currea; Rachel Frazer; Sara M Wasserman; Jamie Theobald
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.